伊隆馬斯克不再是狗狗幣操縱訴訟中的被告

一項重大進展是，針對伊隆馬斯克及其電動車公司特斯拉的集體訴訟已正式撤回。

A class action lawsuit filed against Elon Musk and his electric car company, Tesla, over allegations that he manipulated the price of Dogecoin (DOGE) has officially been withdrawn by investors.

針對馬斯克（Elon Musk）及其電動汽車公司特斯拉（Tesla）提起的集體訴訟，指控他操縱狗狗幣（DOGE）的價格，該訴訟已被投資者正式撤回。

The development follows a lengthy and heated legal dispute, which began with a lawsuit accusing Musk of manipulating Dogecoin’s price for personal gain.

這項進展是在一場漫長而激烈的法律糾紛之後發生的，這場糾紛始於一場指控馬斯克操縱狗狗幣價格以謀取個人利益的訴訟。

Investors had initially claimed that Musk, being the world’s richest person, used his position to manipulate Dogecoin’s value.

投資者最初聲稱，身為世界首富的馬斯克利用他的地位操縱了狗狗幣的價值。

They pointed to his public stunts and X posts as key factors influencing cryptocurrency prices.

他們指出他的公開噱頭和 X 貼文是影響加密貨幣價格的關鍵因素。

According to the investors, this manipulation resulted in significant financial losses when the asset’s value plummeted.

據投資者稱，當資產價值暴跌時，這種操縱行為導致了重大財務損失。

The case was initially dismissed in late August 2024. This came after U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein found the investors’ securities fraud claims unproven.

該案最初於 2024 年 8 月下旬被駁回。

Investors had filed the class action lawsuit against Musk in June 2023. The lawsuit accused Musk, Tesla, and SpaceX of operating a Dogecoin pyramid scheme to inflate the cryptocurrency’s price.

投資者於 2023 年 6 月對馬斯克提起集體訴訟。

The investors claimed that Musk and his companies promoted Dogecoin without disclosing their financial interest in the cryptocurrency, and that they misled investors by making false and exaggerated statements about Dogecoin’s value.

投資者聲稱，馬斯克和他的公司在沒有披露其在加密貨幣中的經濟利益的情況下推廣狗狗幣，並且他們通過對狗狗幣的價值做出虛假和誇大的陳述來誤導投資者。

The lawsuit sought unspecified damages, alleging that investors lost billions of dollars due to Musk’s and his companies’ actions.

該訴訟尋求未具體說明的損害賠償，聲稱投資者因馬斯克及其公司的行為而損失了數十億美元。

In August 2024, Hellerstein dismissed the securities fraud claims against Musk, but he allowed the plaintiffs to file an amended complaint within 28 days.

2024 年 8 月，海勒斯坦駁回了針對馬斯克的證券詐欺指控，但他允許原告在 28 天內提交修改後的申訴。

The judge found that the investors failed to demonstrate how Musk’s statements or omissions caused their economic injuries.

法官認為，投資者未能證明馬斯克的言論或遺漏如何造成了他們的經濟損失。

Specifically, Hellerstein noted that Musk’s posts, like “Doge to the Moon” and promoting Dogecoin as the future currency, lacked legal merit.

具體而言，海勒斯坦指出，馬斯克的帖子，例如「狗狗登月」和宣傳狗狗幣作為未來貨幣，缺乏法律依據。

The judge ruled that no reasonable investor could claim reliance on Musk’s statements for investment decisions or prove market manipulation.

法官裁定，任何理性的投資者都不能聲稱依賴馬斯克的聲明進行投資決策或證明市場操縱。

The plaintiffs filed an appeal to keep the case in court at the time.

原告當時提出上訴，要求將案件保留在法庭上。

However, on Thursday, investors and Musk agreed to dismiss the appeal and all related motions, effectively closing the legal proceedings.

然而，週四，投資者和馬斯克同意駁回上訴和所有相關動議，從而有效地結束了法律訴訟。

The investors had originally sought a staggering $258 billion in damages, claiming Musk intentionally manipulated Dogecoin’s price for personal gain at investors’ expense.

投資者最初尋求高達 2,580 億美元的賠償，聲稱馬斯克故意操縱狗狗幣的價格，以犧牲投資者的利益為代價謀取個人利益。

Over two years, the plaintiffs repeatedly amended their complaint, adjusting legal theories, but failed to convince the court.

兩年多來，原告多次修改訴狀、調整法律理論，但未能說服法院。

The lawsuit gained considerable attention, partly due to Elon Musk’s status as a high-profile figure in both the tech and crypto worlds.

該訴訟引起了相當大的關注，部分原因是伊隆馬斯克在科技和加密世界中的高調人物地位。

It also raised questions about the level of responsibility public figures have when making statements that could impact the market.

它也提出了公眾人物在發表可能影響市場的言論時所承擔的責任程度的問題。

This is especially significant in the volatile world of digital assets, where such statements can lead to market fluctuations.

這在動盪的數位資產世界中尤其重要，此類聲明可能會導致市場波動。

Despite the case dismissal, the legal skirmishes did not stop there. The investors attempted to sanction Musk’s lawyers, accusing them of interfering with the appeal by demanding excessive legal fees.

儘管案件被駁回，但法律衝突並沒有就此停止。投資者試圖制裁馬斯克的律師，指控他們收取過高的律師費，幹擾上訴。

In response, Musk’s legal team countered with a motion to sanction the investors’ lawyer. Musk’s team argued that the case was frivolous and designed to pressure a quick settlement.

作為回應，馬斯克的法律團隊提出了一項制裁投資者律師的動議。馬斯克的團隊辯稱，此案毫無意義，旨在迫使其迅速達成和解。

Ultimately, both sides agreed to withdraw their motions and settle the matter outside court, ending the legal process.

最終，雙方同意撤回動議並在法庭外和解，結束法律程序。

As for what next, the case’s dismissal leaves Musk and Tesla unscathed for now, but the future of Dogecoin remains uncertain.

至於接下來會發生什麼，該案的駁回讓馬斯克和特斯拉暫時沒有受到損害，但狗狗幣的未來仍然不確定。

The crypto community questions whether Musk will continue his recent promotions featuring the memecoin.

加密社群質疑馬斯克是否會繼續他最近以迷因幣為特色的促銷活動。

Dogecoin Price: Will It Rebound?

狗狗幣價格：會反彈嗎？

With the lawsuit behind them, attention turns to Dogecoin’s future. Despite Musk’s influence, Dogecoin remains a memecoin, driven by community sentiment rather than core fundamentals.

隨著訴訟的結束，人們的注意力轉向了狗狗幣的未來。儘管受到馬斯克的影響，狗狗幣仍然是一種迷因幣，其驅動力是社區情緒而不是核心基本面。

While it shows resilience, it faces stiff competition from other assets offering more utility.

雖然它顯示出彈性，但它面臨著其他提供更多效用的資產的激烈競爭。

According to current market data, the DOGE price was trading at $0.358600, down 9.09% in the last 24 hours.

根據目前市場數據，DOGE價格報0.358600美元，過去24小時下跌9.09%。

Speculatively, Dogecoin’s future may hinge on market trends, Musk’s role with X, and the community’s ability to find new use cases.

據推測，狗狗幣的未來可能取決於市場趨勢、馬斯克在 X 中的角色以及社區尋找新用例的能力。

Whether it can recover its highs or stabilize long-term growth trends remains uncertain.

能否恢復高點或穩定長期成長趨勢仍存在不確定性。