SEC又對主要加密貨幣公司提起了三起訴訟

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）已正式選擇針對幾家著名的加密貨幣公司製止其民事執法行動

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has now dropped three more lawsuits, this time against cryptocurrency firm Kraken, Consensys and Cumberland.

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）現在又提起了三起訴訟，這次是針對加密貨幣公司Kraken，Consensys和Cumberland的。

According to a recent report by Law360, the SEC has reached agreements with Payward Inc. and Payward Ventures Inc., which operate under the Kraken name, Consensys Software Inc. and Cumberland DRW LLC to discontinue these actions with prejudice.

根據Law360的最新報告，SEC已與Payward Inc.和Payward Ventures Inc.達成協議，該公司以Kraken Name，Consensys Software Inc.和Cumberland Drw LLC的身份運營，以與Prejudice停止這些行動。

The agency stated in its motions to dismiss that these cases are being dropped not because of any merit or weakness in the allegations but rather as part of a broader shift in its regulatory strategy.

該機構在動議中指出，駁回這些案件的撤銷並不是因為指控的任何優點或弱點，而是其監管策略的更廣泛轉變的一部分。

The SEC explained that it is currently engaged in a process of updating and refining its approach to policing the digital asset markets in response to the cryptocurrency industry’s rapid evolution.

SEC解釋說，它目前正在進行更新和完善其對加密貨幣行業快速發展的數字資產市場進行維持的方法。

As part of this broader initiative, the agency has decided to discontinue its pending enforcement actions against Payward, Consensys and Cumberland.

作為這項更廣泛倡議的一部分，該機構已決定中止對Payward，Consensys和Cumberland的執法行動。

However, the SEC was quick to point out that this action should not be interpreted as signaling any change in its position regarding other pending enforcement actions within the industry.

但是，SEC很快指出，該行動不應被解釋為表明其在行業內執行其他執法行動方面的立場發生任何變化。

The agency made it clear that the decision in these specific cases does not reflect its stance on other lawsuits still in progress.

該機構明確表示，在這些特定案件中的決定並不能反映其對仍在進行的其他訴訟的立場。

This latest development comes amid the SEC’s ongoing crackdown on the cryptocurrency sector, a stance that has led to numerous legal battles with prominent firms.

這一最新發展是出於SEC對加密貨幣部門的持續鎮壓，這一立場導致了與著名公司的眾多法律鬥爭。

However, the dropping of these cases suggests the SEC might be recalibrating its legal strategy, likely in response to mounting pressure from the cryptocurrency industry, changing market conditions and ongoing discussions within the regulatory community.

但是，這些案件的刪除表明，SEC可能正在重新啟用其法律策略，這可能是為了響應加密貨幣行業的日益壓力，不斷變化的市場狀況和監管社區中正在進行的討論。

It could be seen as an indication of the SEC’s willingness to reassess how it handles crypto-related enforcement, balancing regulatory concerns with industry developments.

它可以看作是SEC願意重新評估其處理加密相關的執法，平衡監管問題與行業發展的意願。