市值: $3.2586T 1.500%
體積(24小時): $97.3728B 18.350%
  • 市值: $3.2586T 1.500%
  • 體積(24小時): $97.3728B 18.350%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.2586T 1.500%
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
Top News
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$98433.185399 USD

1.59%

ethereum
ethereum

$2763.459218 USD

1.27%

xrp
xrp

$2.668025 USD

-0.54%

tether
tether

$1.000217 USD

0.02%

bnb
bnb

$653.708822 USD

0.95%

solana
solana

$175.851956 USD

2.55%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999920 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.253731 USD

-0.29%

cardano
cardano

$0.797338 USD

1.97%

tron
tron

$0.250127 USD

5.04%

chainlink
chainlink

$18.347549 USD

1.13%

sui
sui

$3.505087 USD

6.65%

avalanche
avalanche

$25.192409 USD

5.07%

stellar
stellar

$0.339360 USD

-0.30%

litecoin
litecoin

$133.960706 USD

3.07%

加密貨幣新聞文章

CZ的狗西蘭花點燃了BNB鏈上的一堆模因硬幣,但是鏈條可以承受測試嗎?

2025/02/17 09:23

在加密貨幣的世界中,熱事件總是像波浪一樣上升和下降。 2月13日至14日,CZ的寵物狗周圍的BNB連鎖店爆發了一系列的PVP瘋狂。

CZ的狗西蘭花點燃了BNB鏈上的一堆模因硬幣,但是鏈條可以承受測試嗎?

CZ's dog Broccoli sparked a massive PVP battle on the BNB Chain, with a large number of homogeneous tokens named "Broccoli" emerging simultaneously on the BNB Chain, quickly flooding the new coin boards with the same images and names.

CZ的狗西蘭花在BNB鏈上引發了一場大規模的PVP戰鬥,並在BNB鏈上同時出現了大量同質令牌“ Broccoli”,並以相同的圖像和名稱迅速淹沒了新的硬幣板。

The participation of Bounce Brand's official team pushed the "Broccoli" hype to new heights. On the evening of the 13th, Bounce Brand launched a new token, initially named $MAL after CZ's Belgian Malinois dog. However, after CZ revealed his dog's real name, Bounce Brand renamed the already launched $MAL token to $BROCCOLI and provided the contract address on the BNB Chain.

Bounce Brand的官方團隊的參與將“西蘭花”的炒作推向了新的高度。 13日晚上,Bounce Brand推出了一個新的代幣,最初以CZ的比利時瑪利諾犬命名為$ MAL。但是,在CZ透露了他的狗的真實姓名之後,Bounce品牌重命名為已經推出的$ mal代幣到$ baroccoli,並在BNB連鎖店提供了合同地址。

Well-known KOL "Calm Down, Calm Down, Calm Down (@hexiecs)" bought 1% of the $BROCCOLI launched by Bounce Bit, stating that he did so because: 1. Bounce Bit team deployment, fair launch, unlike several other coins' developers with massive insider trading; 2. A genuine OG contract that was deployed before CZ announced it, and then renamed after CZ revealed the name; 3. Several coins from the Bounce Bit team have been listed on Binance, providing some imaginative space.

眾所周知的科爾“冷靜下來,冷靜下來,冷靜下來(@hexiecs)”購買了Bounce BIT推出的$ BROCCOLI的1%,他說他這樣做了,因為:1。Bounce BiT Bit Team部署,公平發射,與其他幾個不同不同硬幣的開發人員進行了大規模的內幕交易; 2。在CZ宣布它之前已部署的真正OG合同,然後在CZ透露該名稱後重命名; 3。彈跳團隊的幾枚硬幣已被列為二元,提供了一些想像力的空間。

Compared to other tokens that may only stand out after experiencing intense PVP, the token released by Bounce Brand's official team acted like a striking buoy in this meme melee, quickly catching the attention of numerous investors. After the announcement of the token renaming, its market cap surged, reaching a peak of over $70 million within about 2 hours.

與其他只有在經歷了強烈的PVP之後可能脫穎而出的代幣相比,Bounce Brand的官方團隊發布的代幣在這場模因中的近戰中像醒目的浮標一樣,很快引起了許多投資者的注意。在宣布將令牌重命名後,其市值飆升,在大約2小時內達到了超過7000萬美元的高峰。

However, in the end, Bounce Brand's token did not become the "Broccoli leader." The popular project on the Binance Web3 wallet (which previously had the "CZ's Dog" project, now deleted) showed that as of the time of writing, the highest market cap among Broccoli series tokens was only $300 million. Despite high market participation, a leading project with a high consensus has yet to form.

但是,最終,Bounce Brand的代幣並未成為“西蘭花領導者”。 Binance Web3錢包上的流行項目(以前已刪除了“ CZ的狗”項目)表明,截至寫作時,西蘭花系列代幣中最高的市場上限僅為3億美元。儘管市場參與很高,但尚未達成共識的領先項目尚未形成。

When tens of thousands of meme coins named Broccoli appeared on the BNB Chain, the BNB Chain did not provide users with a smooth service like the Solana chain. Countless investors experienced the embarrassment of being unable to buy or sell, network congestion, page freezes, getting caught in traps, and encountering numerous rug pulls… With Solana's success as a precedent, investors couldn't help but complain about the poor user experience of the BNB Chain.

當BNB鏈上出現成千上萬個名為Broccoli的模因硬幣時,BNB鏈並未為用戶提供像Solana鏈這樣的平滑服務。無數投資者感到無法買賣,網絡擁塞,頁面凍結,陷入陷阱以及遇到許多地毯拉力的尷尬境地……隨著索拉納(Solana)的成功,投資者忍不住抱怨糟糕的用戶體驗BNB鏈。

To visually demonstrate the gap in infrastructure between the BNB Chain and the Solana chain, I selected several aspects for comparison: TPS and transaction volume, daily active users, token creation data, and security and compliance.

為了在視覺上證明BNB鍊和Solana鏈之間的基礎架構差距,我選擇了幾個方面以進行比較:TPS和交易量,日常活躍用戶,代幣創建數據以及安全性和合規性。

1. TPS and Transaction Volume

1。TPS和交易量

Solana is favored for its high throughput and low latency. The transaction volume can reach thousands or even tens of thousands per second, greatly enhancing the network's processing capacity. For a large number of meme coins, Solana can handle a massive volume of transactions in a short time without bottlenecks. Although BSC does not perform as highly as Solana, it still maintains a relatively high transaction speed, and its simpler structure allows for stable transaction processing. BSC improves its compatibility with the existing Ethereum ecosystem by using Ethereum-compatible smart contracts (EVM), which helps attract more developers.

Solana因其高吞吐量和低潛伏期而受到青睞。交易量可以達到每秒數千甚至數万美元,從而大大提高了網絡的處理能力。對於大量的模因硬幣,Solana可以在短時間內進行大量交易,而無需瓶頸。儘管BSC的性能不如Solana,但它仍然保持相對較高的交易速度,其簡單的結構允許進行穩定的交易處理。 BSC通過使用以太坊兼容的智能合約(EVM)來提高其與現有以太坊生態系統的兼容性,這有助於吸引更多的開發人員。

In terms of transaction speed, according to blockchain explorer data, the real-time TPS on the Solana chain is 1,204, while the real-time TPS on the BNB Chain is 96.3. The peak TPS for BSC is about 300-404, while Solana's theoretical peak TPS is 65,500, but the daily TPS is generally over 1,000. The data comparison is clear; Solana's transaction speed potential far exceeds that of the BNB Chain. In terms of transaction volume, according to DefiLlama data, the 24-hour transaction volume on the Solana chain is $3.772 billion, while the BNB Chain's 24-hour transaction volume is $3.292 billion, making them roughly equivalent.

在交易速度方面,根據區塊鏈資源管理器數據,Solana鏈上的實時TPS為1,204,而BNB鏈上的實時TPS為96.3。 BSC的峰值TPS約為300-404,而Solana的理論峰值TPS為65,500,但每日TPS通常超過1,000。數據比較很明顯; Solana的交易速度勢遠遠超過BNB鏈的交易速度。根據Defillama數據,就交易量而言,Solana鏈的24小時交易量為37.72億美元,而BNB鏈的24小時交易量為32.92億美元,使其大致相同。

2. Daily Active Users

2。日常活躍用戶

According to DefiLlama data, the 24-hour active users on the Solana chain are 4.67 million, while the BNB Chain has 1.73 million active users, making Solana's active user count nearly three times that of BNB Chain. A high number of active users indicates greater transaction demand and on-chain liquidity, which is crucial for the rapid trading and dissemination of meme coins. For a long time, the Solana chain has been the main venue for meme coin PVP, thus accumulating a large number of active users. Due to user inertia, even as BNB Chain's popularity gradually increases, users on the Solana chain are unlikely to migrate to the BNB Chain quickly.

根據Defillama數據,Solana鏈上的24小時活躍用戶為467萬,而BNB鏈具有173萬活躍用戶,使Solana的Active用戶數量幾乎是BNB鏈的三倍。大量的活躍用戶表明交易需求和鏈上流動性更大,這對於模因硬幣的快速交易和傳播至關重要。長期以來,Solana鏈一直是Meme Coin PvP的主要場所,因此積累了大量活躍用戶。由於用戶慣性,即使BNB鏈的受歡迎程度逐漸提高,Solana鏈上的用戶不太可能快速遷移到BNB鏈。

3. Number of Tokens Created and Daily Token Creation

3。創建和每日代幣創建的代幣數量

KOL DefiMochi (@defimochi) disclosed a statistic from Dune on Twitter, showing the token deployment situation on the four.meme and pump.fun platforms. The data indicates that a

KOL DEFIMOCHI(@DefiMochi)在Twitter上披露了Dune的統計數據,顯示了Four.meme和pump.fun平台上的令牌部署情況。數據表明

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年02月21日 其他文章發表於