操縱果凍我的果凍（果凍）memecoin的獎品的加密鯨仍然擁有價值近200萬美元的代幣

一名加密鯨魚據稱操縱了果凍我的果凍（果凍）成員的獎品

A crypto whale who allegedly manipulated the price of the Jelly my Jelly (JELLY) memecoin on decentralized exchange Hyperliquid still holds nearly $2 million worth of the token, according to blockchain analysts.

根據區塊鏈分析師的說法，一名加密鯨魚據稱操縱果凍的果凍（果凍）Memecoin在去中心化交易所超級流動性上的價格仍然持有價值近200萬美元的代幣。

The unidentified whale made at least $6.26 million in profit by exploiting the liquidation parameters on Hyperliquid.

身份不明的鯨魚通過利用超液體的清算參數來賺取至少626萬美元的利潤。

According to a postmortem report by blockchain intelligence firm Arkham, the whale opened three large trading positions within five minutes: two long positions worth $2.15 million and $1.9 million, and a $4.1 million short position that effectively offset the longs.

根據區塊鏈情報公司阿卡姆（Arkham）的一份驗屍報告，鯨魚在五分鐘內開設了三個大型交易職位：兩個長職位，價值215萬美元和190萬美元，還有410萬美元的短期職位，有效地抵消了長期的長期。

Source: Arkham

資料來源：阿卡姆

When the price of JELLY rose by 400%, the $4 million short position wasn’t immediately liquidated due to its size. Instead, it was absorbed into the Hyperliquidity Provider Vault (HLP), which is designed to liquidate large positions.

當果凍的價格上漲400％時，由於其尺寸，$ 400萬美元的短職位沒有立即清算。取而代之的是，它被吸收到旨在清算大型位置的高流動性提供商庫（HLP）中。

Related: Polymarket faces scrutiny over $7M Ukraine mineral deal bet

相關：Polymarket面對700萬美元的烏克蘭礦產交易的審查下注

In more troubling revelations, the entity may still be holding nearly $2 million worth of the token’s supply, according to blockchain investigator ZachXBT.

根據區塊鏈調查員Zachxbt的說法，在更令人不安的啟示中，該實體可能仍然持有價值近200萬美元的代幣供應。

“Five addresses linked to the entity who manipulated JELLY on Hyperliquid still hold ~10% of the JELLY supply on Solana ($1.9M+). All JELLY was purchased since March 22, 2025,” he wrote in a March 26 Telegram post.

他在3月26日的電報帖子中寫道：“與操縱果凍的實體相關的五個地址仍然持有索拉納（Solana）的果凍供應量的約10％（$ 19M+）。所有果凍都是自2025年3月22日以來購買的。”

The entity continues selling the tokens despite Hyperliquid freezing and delisting the memecoin, citing “evidence of suspicious market activity” involving trading instruments.

儘管過度流動性的凍結和將Memecoin推薦，但該實體仍繼續出售代幣，理由是“可疑市場活動的證據”涉及貿易工具。

The JELLY token’s collapse is the latest in a series of memecoin scandals and insider schemes looking to capitalize on investor hype.

果凍代幣的崩潰是一系列旨在利用投資者大肆宣傳的成人醜聞醜聞和內部人士計劃中的最新消息。

Source: Bubblemaps

來源：氣泡

The exploit occurred only two weeks after a Wolf of Wall Street-inspired memecoin — launched by the Official Melania Meme (MELANIA) and Libra (LIBRA) token co-creator Hayden Davis — crashed over 99% after launching with an 80% insider supply.

該漏洞發生僅在華爾街啟發的Memecoin的狼之後兩週，這是由Melania Meme（Melania）官方發起的，Libra（天秤座）代幣共同創造者海頓·戴維斯（Haydan Davis）在以80％的內幕供應啟動後墜毀了99％。

WOLF/SOL, market cap, 1-hour chart. Source: Dexscreener

Wolf/Sol，市值，1小時圖表。資料來源：dexscreener

Related: Polymarket whale raises Trump odds, sparking manipulation concerns

相關：Polymarket Whale提高了特朗普的賠率，引發操縱問題

Lessons from the JELLY memecoin meltdown: ‘Hype without fundamentals’

果凍模因崩潰的教訓：“沒有基本面的炒作”

“The JELLY incident is a clear reminder that hype without fundamentals doesn’t last,” according to Alvin Kan, chief operating officer at Bitget Wallet.

Bitget Wallet首席運營官Alvin Kan表示：“果凍事件明顯提醒您，沒有基本原理的炒作不會持續下去。”

“In DeFi, momentum can drive short-term attention, but it doesn’t build sustainable platforms,” Kan told Cointelegraph, adding:

“在Defi中，動量可以引起短期關注，但並不能建立可持續的平台，” Kan告訴Cointelegraph，並補充說：

While Hyperliquid’s response cushioned short-term damage, it raises further questions about decentralization, as similar interventions “blur the line between decentralized ethos and centralized control.”

儘管超流動的反應緩解了短期損害，但它引起了關於權力下放的進一步問題，因為類似的干預措施“模糊了分散精神和集中式控制之間的界限”。

The Hyper Foundation, Hyperliquid’s ecosystem nonprofit, will “automatically” reimburse most affected users for losses related to the incident, except the addresses belonging to the exploiter.

超級流動性的生態系統非營利組織Hyper Foundation將“自動”償還大多數受影響的用戶與事件相關的損失，但屬於剝削者的地址除外。