crypto.com遭到抨擊，據稱秘密地掩蓋了700億個cro代幣

在聲稱重新掩蓋了700億個CRO代幣的秘密重新啟動之後，其Cronos區塊鏈的當地加密貨幣（領先的比特幣交易所Crypto.com）受到了抨擊，並被指控從事欺詐性活動。

Claims of leading bitcoin (BTC) exchange Crypto.com’s covert re-minting of 70 billion Chronos (CRO) tokens have surfaced, implicating the exchange in fraudulent activities.

領先的比特幣（BTC）交換Crypto.com的索賠要求重新製作了700億個Chronos（CRO）代幣的秘密，浮出水面，這暗示了欺詐活動的交流。

As assertions from the Bitcoin community unfolded, Crypto.com stands accused of reversing a past token burn to an enormous extent. Earlier in 2021, reports surfaced of Crypto.com executing a substantial 70 billion CRO token burn, a significant portion of the total supply.

隨著比特幣社區的斷言的展開，Crypto.com被指控逆轉了過去的代幣燃燒的程度。 2021年初，Crypto.com的報導浮出水面，執行了700億個CRO代幣燒傷，這是總供應量的很大一部分。

This action was widely reported as a deliberate move to decrease the circulating supply, thereby aiming to boost the scarcity and potentially the value of the remaining CRO tokens.

該行動被廣泛報導是旨在減少循環供應的故意舉措，從而促進稀缺性和剩餘CRO令牌的價值。

Within the crypto community, token burns are generally viewed as deflationary signals, demonstrating long-term dedication to the project’s viability and beneficial. The news of the 2021 burn was met with great enthusiasm and seen as a positive step towards network decentralization and enhancing the economic value proposition of CRO.

在加密社區中，令牌燃燒通常被視為通縮信號，表明了對項目的生存能力和有益的長期奉獻精神。 2021年燃燒的消息充滿熱情，並被視為朝著網絡分散和增強CRO的經濟價值主張邁出的積極一步。

However, recent allegations within the Bitcoin community suggest that these 70 billion CRO tokens might have been later re-minted by Crypto.com without sufficient disclosure or permission from the community.

但是，比特幣社區中的最新指控表明，這700億個CRO令牌可能後來被Crypto.com重新啟動，沒有社區的充分披露或許可。

This assertion has sparked significant debate, with some community members providing analysis of blockchain data to support the claims, while others express skepticism.

這一主張引發了重大辯論，一些社區成員提供了對區塊鏈數據的分析以支持索賠，而另一些社區則表示懷疑。

The core of the allegations lies in an inconsistency between the publicly reported circulating and total supply of CRO on platforms like CoinMarketCap and the actual quantity of tokens held in various wallets associated with Crypto.com, as asserted by community members.

指控的核心在於公開報導的循環與CoinMarketCap等平台上的CRO總供應與Crypto.com相關的各種錢包中的實際代幣數量，如社區成員所宣稱的。

If true, such behavior would effectively negate the intended consequences of the token burn and might be seen as deceptive conduct designed to manipulate funding operations or the market without transparency.

如果是真的，這種行為將有效地否定令牌燃燒的預期後果，並且可能被視為欺騙性的行為，旨在操縱資金行動或市場而沒有透明度。

The charges against Crypto.com have caused considerable outrage and alarm among users of the exchange, especially those in the Bitcoin community.

針對Crypto.com的指控引起了交易所使用者的憤怒和警報，尤其是比特幣社區中的那些。

A fundamental aspect of trust in cryptocurrency ventures is transparency about token supply and tokenomics. The alleged covert re-minting of such a massive volume of tokens raises serious questions about Crypto.com’s respect for its users and investors and its commitment to operating with integrity.

對加密貨幣的信任的一個基本方面是關於令牌供應和令牌學的透明度。所謂的秘密重新塑造瞭如此龐大的代幣，引發了有關Crypto.com對其用戶和投資者的尊重及其對誠信運營的承諾的嚴重問題。

Many community members feel betrayed by the actions of the exchange and are demanding a complete and honest response from Crypto.com regarding these accusations.

許多社區成員對交流的行動感到背叛，並要求Crypto.com對這些指控做出完整而誠實的回應。

The lack of official correspondence addressing these particular assertions has heightened the worries and fueled rumors even more.

缺乏解決這些特定斷言的官方信件使人們更加擔心，並加劇了謠言。

The claims of fraudulent activity from Crypto.com could have significant effects on the price of the CRO token.

Crypto.com的欺詐活動的主張可能會對CRO代幣的價格產生重大影響。

If the 70 billion tokens were indeed later re-mintered after the initial burn, it would effectively increase the circulating supply considerably.

如果確實在最初的燃燒後確實重新切入了700億個令牌，它將有效地大大增加循環供應。

This unexpected and undisclosed action can introduce inflationary pressures, ultimately depreciating the value of the holdings of current CRO holders who trusted the exchange’s actions.

這種意外的和未公開的行動可能會引入通貨膨脹壓力，最終貶低了信任交易所行動的當前CRO持有人的持有價值。

Moreover, the reputational damage to Crypto.com could be substantial, leading to a decrease in user activity and trust in the exchange.

此外，對crypto.com的聲譽損害可能很大，從而導致用戶活動減少和對交易所的信任。

Hence, any apparent act of dishonesty or manipulation could have lasting negative consequences for the viability and success of an enterprise, especially in the sensitive and community-driven domain of cryptocurrency.

因此，任何明顯的不誠實或操縱行為都可能對企業的生存能力和成功產生負面影響，尤其是在敏感和社區驅動的加密貨幣領域。