克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 撤回中本聰訴訟：Hodlonaut 在加密誹謗傳奇中被證明是正確的

自稱是比特幣創造者的克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 與其對手 Hodlonaut 之間曠日持久的法律鬥爭最終導致挪威法院做出了有利於 Hodlonaut 的判決。賴特隨後撤回了對 Hodlonaut 的訴訟，這引發了人們對他自稱的中本聰身份的進一步懷疑。

The Saga of Craig Wright and Satoshi Nakamoto: A Legal Battle Concludes

克雷格·賴特與中本聰的傳奇：法律之戰結束

In the annals of cryptocurrency lore, the feud between Craig Wright and Hodlonaut stands as a protracted and controversial legal battle that has captivated the blockchain community for years. The dispute, which originated from contentious social media posts in 2019, has tested the boundaries of defamation law and raised fundamental questions about the true identity of Bitcoin's enigmatic creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.

在加密貨幣傳說中，克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 和 Hodlonaut 之間的不和是一場曠日持久且充滿爭議的法律鬥爭，多年來一直吸引著區塊鏈社區。這場爭議源於 2019 年有爭議的社交媒體帖子，考驗了誹謗法的界限，並對比特幣神秘創造者中本聰的真實身份提出了根本性問題。

Origins of the Feud

世仇的起源

The seeds of this legal saga were sown in May 2019 when Hodlonaut, a prominent figure in the Norwegian Bitcoin scene, publicly denounced Wright as a "scammer" and a "fraud." Hodlonaut's allegations stemmed from doubts surrounding Wright's claims to be the mastermind behind Bitcoin's creation.

這場法律傳奇的種子於 2019 年 5 月播下，當時挪威比特幣界的知名人物 Hodlonaut 公開譴責 Wright 是「騙子」和「詐欺者」。 Hodlonaut 的指控源於對賴特自稱是比特幣創造背後策劃者的懷疑。

Wright, a self-proclaimed computer scientist and entrepreneur, had long asserted that he was the real Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous figure who authored the Bitcoin white paper and launched the revolutionary cryptocurrency in 2009. However, his claims were met with widespread skepticism and accusations of fraud from within the crypto community.

自稱電腦科學家和企業家的賴特長期以來一直堅稱自己是真正的中本聰，即撰寫比特幣白皮書並於2009 年推出革命性加密貨幣的化名人物。然而，他的說法遭到了廣泛的懷疑和指責來自加密社群內部的詐欺行為。

Defamation Lawsuit and Oslo Trial

誹謗訴訟和奧斯陸審判

Infuriated by Hodlonaut's public denunciations, Wright launched a defamation lawsuit against him in 2020. The lawsuit, which spanned multiple jurisdictions, became a focal point of debate within the cryptocurrency community, with many questioning the validity of Wright's claims and the potential implications for freedom of speech in the digital realm.

懷特對Hodlonaut 的公開譴責感到憤怒，於2020 年對他發起了誹謗訴訟。潛在影響。

In 2022, the case finally went to trial in Oslo, Norway, where Hodlonaut resided. The trial attracted intense media attention and was closely followed by cryptocurrency enthusiasts worldwide. After careful consideration of the evidence presented, the Norwegian judge delivered a decisive verdict in favor of Hodlonaut, ruling that Wright had failed to prove his case.

2022年，該案最終在霍德洛瑙特居住的挪威奧斯陸開庭。該試驗引起了媒體的強烈關注，並受到全球加密貨幣愛好者的密切關注。經過仔細考慮所提供的證據後，挪威法官做出了有利於霍德洛瑙特的決定性判決，裁定賴特未能證明他的案子。

The judge's ruling, which underscored substantial doubts regarding Wright's claims, provided Hodlonaut with a crucial legal victory. The outcome dealt a significant blow to Wright's credibility and served as a defense against potential defamation suits he might bring forth in the future.

法官的裁決凸顯了對賴特主張的重大質疑，為霍德洛諾特贏得了至關重要的法律勝利。這一結果對賴特的信譽造成了重大打擊，並為他未來可能提出的潛在誹謗訴訟提供了辯護。

Wright's Appeal and Withdrawal

賴特的上訴和撤回

Unwilling to accept the court's decision, Wright pursued an appeal against the ruling, prolonging the legal standoff for nearly five years. However, in a stunning reversal, Wright has now chosen to abandon his pursuit of legal action against Hodlonaut, effectively bringing an end to the prolonged dispute.

賴特不願接受法院的裁決，對裁決提出上訴，使法律僵局延長了近五年。然而，令人震驚的是，賴特現在選擇放棄對 Hodlonaut 採取法律行動，有效地結束了曠日持久的糾紛。

This development represents a significant setback for Wright, whose assertions of being Satoshi Nakamoto have long been met with skepticism from various quarters of the cryptocurrency community. By withdrawing his lawsuit, Wright has inadvertently fueled further doubt regarding his proclaimed identity as Bitcoin's enigmatic creator.

這一進展對賴特來說是一個重大挫折，他關於中本聰的說法長期以來一直受到加密貨幣社區各個方面的懷疑。透過撤回訴訟，賴特無意中加劇了人們對他所宣稱的比特幣神秘創造者身分的進一步懷疑。

Implications for Cryptocurrency Regulation

對加密貨幣監管的影響

The resolution of this legal saga serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities and uncertainties inherent in the realm of cryptocurrency. While Bitcoin has revolutionized the financial landscape, it has also given rise to controversies and legal disputes, underscoring the need for clarity and transparency within the industry.

這項法律傳奇的解決對加密貨幣領域固有的複雜性和不確定性起到了警示作用。雖然比特幣徹底改變了金融格局，但它也引起了爭議和法律糾紛，凸顯了行業內清晰度和透明度的必要性。

The Wright-Hodlonaut case highlights the challenges of applying traditional defamation laws to the decentralized and pseudonymous nature of cryptocurrencies. As the industry continues to evolve, regulators and policymakers will need to grapple with the complexities of regulating digital assets and ensuring the protection of individuals from false and defamatory statements made online.

Wright-Hodlonaut 案凸顯了將傳統誹謗法應用於加密貨幣的去中心化和假名性質所面臨的挑戰。隨著行業的不斷發展，監管機構和政策制定者將需要應對監管數位資產的複雜性，並確保保護個人免受網路虛假和誹謗性言論的影響。

Unresolved Mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto

中本聰的未解之謎

As the dust settles on this dramatic chapter in Bitcoin's history, questions surrounding Satoshi Nakamoto's true identity persist. While Craig Wright may have withdrawn from the legal battlefield, the quest to unravel the mystery of Bitcoin's origins continues unabated, captivating the imagination of enthusiasts and skeptics alike.

隨著比特幣歷史上這段戲劇性篇章的塵埃落定，圍繞著中本聰真實身分的疑問依然存在。儘管克雷格·賴特（Craig Wright）可能已經退出了法律戰場，但對解開比特幣起源之謎的探索仍然有增無減，吸引了比特幣愛好者和懷疑論者的想像。

The ongoing debate over Satoshi Nakamoto's identity serves as a reminder of the transformative power of decentralized technology and the enduring allure of anonymity in the digital age. As Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies continue to shape the global financial landscape, the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto may forever remain an enigma, a testament to the revolutionary and enigmatic nature of the blockchain revolution.

關於中本聰身分的持續爭論提醒我們去中心化科技的變革力量以及數位時代匿名的持久吸引力。隨著比特幣和其他加密貨幣繼續塑造全球金融格局，中本聰之謎可能永遠是一個謎，證明了區塊鏈革命的革命性和神秘性。