Coinbase 財務長 Alesia Haas 對 SEC 潛在的以太坊安全分類提出異議

Coinbase 財務長 Alesia Haas 引述 SEC 和 CFTC 的聲明稱，監管機構不太可能將以太坊 (ETH) 歸類為證券。 Haas 強調美國缺乏全面的加密貨幣監管是分類問題的根源，並強調需要建立明確、公平的監管框架來保護消費者和 Coinbase 等企業。

Coinbase CFO Alesia Haas Dissents from SEC's Potential Classification of Ethereum as a Security

Coinbase 財務長 Alesia Haas 不同意 SEC 將以太坊視為證券的潛在分類

Coinbase Chief Financial Officer Alesia Haas has unequivocally stated her belief that Ethereum (ETH) does not qualify as a security, refuting the recent insinuations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Haas's perspective aligns with previous statements from both the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which have maintained a similar stance on Ethereum's classification.

Coinbase 財務長 Alesia Haas 明確表示，她認為以太坊 (ETH) 不符合證券資格，這駁斥了美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 最近的暗示。哈斯的觀點與美國證券交易委員會和商品期貨交易委員會（CFTC）先前的聲明一致，後者對以太坊的分類保持了類似的立場。

The absence of a clear and comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies in the United States is the root cause of the ongoing debate surrounding ETH's status, according to Haas. The lack of guidance has engendered uncertainty and hindered the development of the crypto industry.

哈斯表示，美國缺乏清晰、全面的加密貨幣監管框架是圍繞 ETH 地位持續爭論的根本原因。缺乏指導造成了不確定性，阻礙了加密產業的發展。

Haas emphasized the urgent need for a "clear, equitable, and applied regulatory framework." Such clarity would not only safeguard consumers but also empower Coinbase to navigate the regulatory landscape more effectively and introduce compliant products.

哈斯強調迫切需要一個「明確、公平和適用的監管框架」。這種明確性不僅可以保護消費者，還可以使 Coinbase 更有效地應對監管環境並推出合規產品。

The SEC's recent issuance of subpoenas, identifying ETH as a security based on its transition to proof-of-stake, has fueled speculation and concerns within the crypto community. These subpoenas, along with an investigation into the Ethereum Foundation, have raised questions about the potential impact on the availability of ETH products in the United States.

美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 最近發出傳票，根據 ETH 向權益證明的過渡將 ETH 認定為一種證券，這引發了加密社區內部的猜測和擔憂。這些傳票以及對以太坊基金會的調查引發了人們對以太坊產品在美國可用性的潛在影響的質疑。

The classification of ETH as a security or a commodity holds significant implications for the crypto industry. If labeled a security, ETH could face regulatory scrutiny similar to stocks and bonds. This could restrict product offerings and limit the accessibility of ETH for investors. The ramifications extend to spot Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which may face different regulatory treatment compared to spot Bitcoin ETFs.

ETH 作為證券或商品的分類對加密產業有重大影響。如果被貼上證券的標籤，ETH 可能會面臨類似股票和債券的監管審查。這可能會限制產品供應並限制投資者獲得 ETH。影響力延伸到現貨以太坊交易所交易基金（ETF），與現貨比特幣 ETF 相比，該基金可能面臨不同的監管待遇。

Coinbase itself is currently embroiled in an ongoing SEC lawsuit involving several of its products. While ETH is mentioned in the case with respect to staking, the SEC has not explicitly alleged that ETH is a security.

Coinbase 本身目前正捲入美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 的一場持續訴訟，涉及其多種產品。儘管本案中提到了 ETH 的質押問題，但 SEC 並未明確聲稱 ETH 是一種證券。

Haas's firm stance against labeling ETH as a security underscores Coinbase's commitment to advocating for a clear and supportive regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies in the United States. The company believes that such clarity will foster innovation, protect investors, and facilitate the mainstream adoption of crypto.

Haas 反對將 ETH 標記為證券的堅定立場突顯了 Coinbase 致力於倡導在美國為加密貨幣建立一個明確且支持性的監管環境。該公司相信，這種明確性將促進創新、保護投資者並促進加密貨幣的主流採用。

The ongoing debate over ETH's classification highlights the complexities and challenges faced by the crypto industry in the face of evolving regulatory landscapes. As the SEC continues to scrutinize various aspects of cryptocurrencies, the industry awaits further guidance and clarity that will shape its future trajectory.

關於 ETH 分類的持續爭論凸顯了加密產業在不斷變化的監管環境下所面臨的複雜性和挑戰。隨著美國證券交易委員會繼續審查加密貨幣的各個方面，該行業正在等待進一步的指導和明確，這將塑造其未來的發展軌跡。