查爾斯·霍斯金森暗示將對懷俄明州穩定代幣委員會採取法律行動

卡爾達諾創始人查爾斯霍斯金森建議，被排除在懷俄明州穩定幣計劃之外的區塊鏈公司可能會採取法律行動

Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has hinted at the possibility of legal action against the Wyoming Stable Token Commission, alleging that the body may have failed to apply fair and transparent selection criteria when determining which blockchain protocols would participate in the project.

卡爾達諾創始人查爾斯·霍斯金森暗示可能對懷俄明州穩定代幣委員會採取法律行動，聲稱該機構在確定哪些區塊鏈協議將參與該項目時可能未能採用公平和透明的選擇標準。

In a recent video update, Hoskinson disclosed an email he received from the Commission, which listed the protocols chosen for the stablecoin project. He expressed confusion over the inclusion of certain blockchains, particularly Stellar, and questioned why well-established protocols such as XRP and ADA were excluded.

在最近的視訊更新中，霍斯金森披露了他從委員會收到的一封電子郵件，其中列出了為穩定幣項目選擇的協議。他對納入某些區塊鏈（尤其是 Stellar）表示困惑，並質疑為何 XRP 和 ADA 等成熟協議被排除在外。

“I don’t understand how Stellar got picked over XRP or ADA, to be quite honest. Maybe somebody can explain that to me,” Hoskinson said.

「說實話，我不明白 Stellar 是如何超越 XRP 或 ADA 的。也許有人可以向我解釋這一點，」霍斯金森說。

Drawing comparisons, Hoskinson noted XRP’s market dominance, highlighting its $82 billion market capitalization and $11 billion daily trading volume. By contrast, Stellar’s metrics stand at a $14.7 billion market cap with $3.8 billion daily trading volume.

透過比較，Hoskinson 指出了 XRP 的市場主導地位，強調其 820 億美元的市值和 110 億美元的每日交易量。相比之下，Stellar 的市值為 147 億美元，每日交易量為 38 億美元。

According to Hoskinson, the Commission’s decision-making process appeared to lack transparency and failed to consider the technical capabilities and market impact of blockchains excluded.

霍斯金森表示，委員會的決策過程似乎缺乏透明度，並且未能考慮到被排除在外的區塊鏈的技術能力和市場影響。

“I don’t think the criteria were applied fairly or transparently, and I think there’s a lot of people that are going to be very upset about this, and I think they should be,” he added.

「我認為這些標準沒有得到公平或透明的應用，我認為很多人都會對此感到非常不安，我認為他們應該如此，」他補充道。

Hoskinson also raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest within the Commission, specifically pointing to its Executive Director (ED). He noted the ED’s prior affiliations with ConsenSys and the Polygon ecosystem, suggesting these ties may have influenced the selection process.

霍斯金森也對委員會內部潛在的利益衝突表示擔憂，特別提到了其執行董事（ED）。他指出 ED 先前與 ConsenSys 和 Polygon 生態系統的關係，顯示這些關係可能影響了選擇過程。

“The ED of the Wyoming Stable Token Commission worked at ConsenSys and Polygon. ConsenSys has had a historically poor relationship with Ripple,” Hoskinson stated, implying that this dynamic could have negatively impacted XRP’s evaluation.

「懷俄明州穩定代幣委員會的執行董事在 ConsenSys 和 Polygon 工作。霍斯金森表示，ConsenSys 與 Ripple 的關係歷史上一直很差，這暗示這種動態可能會對 XRP 的評估產生負面影響。

Several other prominent blockchains, including Algorand, Tezos, and Aptos, were also excluded from the project. According to Hoskinson, the Commission did not offer these protocols the opportunity to present their Proof-of-Concept, further calling into question the fairness of the selection process.

其他幾個著名的區塊鏈，包括 Algorand、Tezos 和 Aptos，也被排除在該專案之外。霍斯金森表示，委員會沒有為這些協議提供展示概念驗證的機會，進一步質疑選擇過程的公平性。

“They didn’t even give the protocols the chance to present their Proof-of-Concept, like Algorand, Tezos, Aptos, and others. I don’t think that’s fair at all,” he said.

「他們甚至沒有給協議提供概念驗證的機會，例如 Algorand、Tezos、Aptos 等。我認為這根本不公平，」他說。

The announcement of the Commission’s selected protocols coincided with a period of declining performance in the cryptocurrency market.

委員會選定的協議的公佈恰逢加密貨幣市場表現下滑的時期。

While no direct link has been established between the decision and market conditions, XRP and ADA have experienced notable price drops. XRP has fallen over 10% from a recent peak, while ADA has declined by 17% over the same timeframe.

雖然該決定與市場狀況之間沒有建立直接聯繫，但 XRP 和 ADA 的價格已顯著下跌。 XRP 較近期高峰下跌了 10% 以上，而 ADA 在同一時間內下跌了 17%。

The exclusion of XRP, ADA, and other major protocols has sparked debate within the crypto community about the criteria used to assess the suitability of blockchain networks for government-backed projects.

XRP、ADA 和其他主要協議的排除引發了加密社群內部關於評估區塊鏈網路是否適合政府支持專案的標準的爭論。

Hoskinson’s suggestion of legal action underscores the growing dissatisfaction among stakeholders, who argue that greater transparency and inclusivity are essential in such initiatives.

霍斯金森提出的採取法律行動的建議凸顯了利益相關者日益增長的不滿，他們認為提高透明度和包容性對於此類舉措至關重要。