Bybit遭受$ 1.5B的黑客攻擊，首席執行官Ben Zhou透露，交換必須開發新軟件以覆蓋戒斷潮

主要的加密貨幣交易所交易所Bybit遭受了近15億美元的黑客襲擊，總流出超過55億美元

Major cryptocurrency exchange Bybit saw total outflows of over $5.5 billion after it suffered a near $1.5 billion hack that saw hackers, believed to be from North Korea’s Lazarus Group, drain its ether cold wallet.

主要的加密貨幣交易所Bybit遭受了近15億美元的黑客攻擊後，總流出超過55億美元，據信黑客被認為是朝鮮的拉撒路集團，消耗了以太冰冷的錢包。

The total assets tracked on wallets associated with the exchange plunged from around $16.9 billion to $11.2 billion at the time of writing, according to data from DeFiLlama. The exchange is now looking to understand exactly what happened.

根據Defillama的數據，在撰寫本文時，與交易所相關的錢包中追踪的總資產從約169億美元跌至112億美元。現在，交易所正在尋求準確了解發生了什麼。

In an X spaces session, Bybit’s CEO Ben Zhou revealed that shortly after the incident, he called for “all hands on deck” to serve their clients with processing withdrawals and responding to inquiries about what was going on.

在X Space會議上，Bybit的首席執行官Ben Zhou透露，事件發生後不久，他呼籲“全力以赴”為客戶提供處理提款，並回應有關發生的事情的詢問。

During the session, Zhou revealed that the security breach saw the hackers make off with roughly 70% of their clients’ ether, which meant that Bybit needed to quickly secure a loan to be able to process withdrawals. Yet, Zhou found that ether wasn’t the most withdrawn token, with most users instead withdrawing stablecoin from Bybit.

在會議期間，週透透露，安全漏洞看到黑客大約有70％的客戶的以太貨幣，這意味著Bybit需要快速獲得貸款以處理提款。然而，週發現以太幣並不是最多的令牌，大多數用戶而是從拜比特撤回stablecoin。

The exchange, Zhou noted, has reserves to cover these withdrawals, but the crisis deepened as, in response to the incident, Safe moved to temporarily shut down its smart wallet functionalities to “ensure absolute confidence in our platform’s security.”

週指出，該交易所有儲備可以掩蓋這些撤離的措施，但是危機加深了，因為對事件的回應，安全搬到了暫時關閉其智能錢包功能，以“確保對我們平台的安全性絕對信心”。

Safe is a decentralized custody protocol providing smart contract wallets for digital asset management. Some exchanges integrated Safe, which allows users to maintain custody of their funds and has multisig functionality to enhance the security of their cold wallets.

Safe是一項分散的監護權協議，可為數字資產管理提供智能合同錢包。一些交易所整合了安全，這使用戶可以維持其資金的監護權，並具有多功能功能以增強其冷錢包的安全性。

While the exchange had reserves to back up users’ withdrawals, $3 billion worth of USDT was in a Safe wallet that had just been shut down as the wallet moved to understand the situation, according to Zhou.

據周說，儘管交易所有儲備金可以支持用戶提款，但價值30億美元的USDT處於安全的錢包中，該錢包剛剛關閉，隨著錢包移動以了解情況。

On social media, Safe said that while it had "not found evidence that the official Safe frontend was compromised," it was temporarily shutting down "certain functionalities" out of caution.

Safe在社交媒體上說，儘管沒有找到官方安全前端受到妥協的證據，但由於謹慎而暫時關閉“某些功能”。

While Zhou and Bybit’s team were figuring out how to securely withdraw their $3 billion, withdrawals were mounting. Within two hours of the security breach, the exchange was facing requests to move over $100,000 off its platform, Zhou revealed.

Zhou和Bybit的團隊正在弄清楚如何安全撤回其30億美元，但提款正在持續。週透透露，在安全漏洞的兩個小時內，該交易所面臨要求將其平台折價超過100,000美元的要求。

Responding to the situation, Zhou told his security team to engage Safe to “find a better way to get this money out.” The team ended up developing new software with code “based on Etherscan” to verify the signatures “on a very manual level” to move the stablecoins back to their wallet and cover the withdrawal surge.

在應對情況下，週告訴他的安全團隊，請確保“找到一種更好的方法來籌集這筆錢”。該團隊最終使用“基於Etherscan”的代碼開發了新軟件，以驗證“在非常手動的水平上”的簽名，以將穩定的固定物移回他們的錢包並覆蓋戒斷潮。

The exchange’s team had to remain up all night to be able to fulfill withdrawals, according to Zhou. As the exchange managed to move the $3 billion in stablecoin reserves, it was facing a bank run of “about 50%” of all the funds within the exchange.

Zhou表示，交易所的團隊必須整夜保持工作，以便能夠撤離。隨著交易所設法搬遷了30億美元的Stablecoin儲備金，它面臨著交易所中所有資金的“約50％”的銀行業務。

Zhou said that since the incident, the exchange has moved a significant amount of funds off of Safe cold wallets and is now determining what system it will use to replace Safe.

周說，自事件以來，交易所已將大量資金從安全的冷錢包中移開，現在正在確定將使用哪種系統來替換安全。

Pushing to "Roll Back" Ethereum Was not Off the TableSince the security breach, Bybit has engaged authorities. During the session, Zhou said that the Singaporean authorities took the issue “very seriously” and that he believes it has already been escalated with Interpol.

拜比特（Bybit）與安全漏洞的桌子不脫離桌子，使當局訂婚。週期間，周說，新加坡當局“非常認真地”對此問題進行了處理，他認為它已經隨著國際刑警組織的升級而升級。

Blockchain analysis firms, including Chainalysis, were engaged. Zhou said, “As long as Bybit is there and continues to track [the stolen ether], I hope we can get these funds back.”

區塊鏈分析公司（包括鏈分析）已參與。周說：“只要Bybit在那裡並繼續跟踪[被盜的以太]，我希望我們可以將這些資金恢復。”

Notably, he revealed that pushing to "roll back" the Ethereum blockchain, which was suggested by some industry players on social media, including BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, had been on the table for some time if the community agreed with it.

值得注意的是，他透露，推動“回滾”以太坊區塊鏈，這是由社交媒體上的一些行業參與者（包括Bitmex聯合創始人Arthur Hayes）提出的，如果社區同意該社區的同意，則已經在餐桌上呆了一段時間。

“I had my team talking to Vitalik and the Ethereum Foundation to see if there’s any recommendations they can offer to help. I do really thank all these guys on Twitter asking if there is a possibility to roll back the chain. I’m not sure what was the response on their side, but anything that would help we would try,” Zhou said.

“我讓我的團隊與Vitalik和以太坊基金會交談，看看他們是否可以提供任何建議。我真的非常感謝Twitter上的所有這些傢伙，詢問是否有可能退縮鏈條。我不確定他們這一邊的反應是什麼，但是我們會嘗試的任何有幫助的一切。”周說。

When asked if "rolling back" the chain is even possible, Zhou responded he doesn’t know. “I’m not sure it’s a one-man decision based on the spirit of blockchain. It should be a work in process to see what the community wants,” he said.

當被問及是否可以“向後”鏈條時，週還不知道他不知道。 “我不確定這是基於區塊鏈精神的單人決定。看看社區想要什麼，應該是一項工作。”他說。

It's worth noting that a blockchain "rollback" refers to a state change that would allow for the funds to be recovered. While rolling back the Bitcoin blockchain is technically possible, such a state change on Ethereum would be more complex, given its smart contract interactions and state-based architecture.

值得注意的是，區塊鏈“回滾”是指允許資金回收的國家變更。雖然從技術上講是可能的，但鑑於其智能合同的互動和基於州的架構，以太坊的這種狀態變化將更加複雜。

Nevertheless, any state change would require consensus and likely lead to a contentious hard fork, drawing criticism from the community. This would likely split the Ethereum blockchain into two networks, each with its own supporters.

然而，任何國家的變革都需要共識，並可能導致有爭議的硬叉，引起社區的批評。這很可能將以太坊區塊鏈分為兩個網絡，每個網絡都有自己的支持者。

As for what exactly caused the hack to occur, is still unclear. Per Zhou, Bybit’s laptops have not been compromised. He said the movements of

至於究竟導致黑客發生的事情，仍然不清楚。根據周，拜比特的筆記本電腦尚未受到損害。他說的動作