Burwick Law呼籲Metaplex計劃將無人認領的Sol掃入國庫

加密律師事務所Burwick Law召集了基於Solana的無牙平台平台Metaplex計劃將無人認領的SOL掃入其財政部，而不是將其退還給投資者。

Crypto law firm Burwick Law has called out Solana-based non-fungible token platform Metaplex’s plan to sweep unclaimed Solana (SOL) into its treasury, suggesting it could be at risk of litigation if it follows through with the plan.

加密律師事務所Burwick Law呼籲基於Solana的非殺菌令牌平台Metaplex計劃將無人認領的Solana（Sol）掃入其財政部，這表明如果該計劃遵循該計劃，它可能有訴訟的風險。

Last year, Metaplex, an NFT protocol, discovered a way to reduce the amount of onchain storage required for certain NFTs. By resizing the NFTs, Solana NFT holders can claim a small amount of SOL.

去年，NFT協議Metaplex發現了一種減少某些NFT所需的OnChain存儲量的方法。通過調整NFT大小，Solana NFT持有人可以聲稱少量的溶膠。

In October, Metaplex said that Metaplex Token Metadata (TM) NFT holders will be able to execute a “resize optimization” for all TM accounts with a deadline of April 25.

Metaplex表示，Metaplex令牌元數據（TM）NFT持有人將能夠對所有TM帳戶執行“調整大小優化”，並在4月25日的截止日期之前執行。

Those who didn’t do it voluntarily by the deadline would have their excess SOL transferred to the Metaplex DAO automatically, with how they’re to be used yet to be determined.

那些沒有在截止日期自願進行的人會自動將其多餘的SOL轉移到Metaplex Dao上，並如何使用它們尚未確定。

However, Burwick criticized the firm’s plan to sweep unclaimed funds to its DAO treasury instead of returning them to NFT holders.

但是，伯威克批評該公司計劃將無人認領的資金掃向其DAO財政部，而不是將其返回NFT持有人。

“Many minters never received clear notice that these lamports could be swept, let alone diverted to a treasury they do not control,” Burwick said in an April 22 open letter to Metaplex and the broader Solana community.

伯威克在4月22日給Metaplex和更廣泛的Solana社區的公開信中說：“許多Minters從未清楚地註意到這些燈具可以被掃除，更不用說轉移到他們無法控制的財政部。”

Burwick said over 54,000 SOL tokens are at risk, and according to Metaplex’s website, only 7,043 SOL have been claimed. At current market prices, more than $6.5 million remains unclaimed.

伯維克說，超過54,000個SOL令牌有風險，根據Metaplex的網站，只有7,043輛溶膠。以目前的市場價格，超過650萬美元的貨幣仍然無人認領。

Burwick said many of the NFT collectors it represents have shared “deep concerns” about the plan.

伯維克說，它代表的許多NFT收藏家都對該計劃表示了“深切關注”。

Burwick added that Metaplex’s plan “erodes trust” and “violates the spirit of crypto.”

Burwick補充說，Metaplex的計劃“侵蝕了信任”並“違反了加密精神”。

Burwick said such a move could entitle victims to restitution should a court find the sweep constituted unjust enrichment or violates consumer protection laws.

伯維克說，如果法院發現掃蕩構成不公正的富集或違反消費者保護法，這樣的舉動可以使受害者有權恢復原狀。

Metaplex hasn’t responded to Burwick’s X post. Cointelegraph reached out to Metaplex but didn’t receive an immediate response.

Metaplex尚未回應Burwick的X帖子。 Cointelegraph與Metaplex取得了聯繫，但沒有立即得到回應。

Metaplex said the unclaimed SOL may be used for the DAO to vote on airdrops, distribute grants to ecosystem builders, or other initiatives.

Metaplex表示，無人認領的SOL可用於DAO對氣水投票，向生態系統建築商或其他計劃分配贈款。

Burwick pitches what Metaplex should do instead

Burwick宣傳Metaplex應該做什麼

Burwick宣傳Metaplex應該做什麼

The crypto lawyers advised Metaplex to pause the plan and refund rent directly to current NFT holders while retaining a “modest” network-maintenance bounty of 10%.

加密律師建議Metaplex暫停該計劃，並將租金直接退還給當前的NFT持有人，同時保留了10％的“適度”網絡維護賞金。

Related: Coinbase distances Base from highly criticized memecoin that dumped $15M

相關：Coinbase距離距高度批評的Memecoin的距離基地傾倒了1500萬美元

Burwick noted that other DeFi protocols have resolved similar issues this way.

Burwick指出，其他DEFI協議以這種方式解決了類似的問題。

The lawyers said there is still plenty of time for Metaplex to execute such a strategy and avoid litigation where funds could be frozen.

律師說，Metaplex仍有足夠的時間執行這種策略，並避免在可以凍結資金的地方進行訴訟。