BTC最大化主義者抱怨特朗普的數字資產儲備探索XRP包容性

BTC最大主義者在過去一周前往社交媒體上，以抱怨特朗普行政命令探索創建數字資產的庫存。

BTC maximalists are crying foul over a Trump Executive Order that would create a digital asset stockpile and complaining that it would include coins other than BTC.

BTC最大化主義者對特朗普的行政命令哭泣，該命令將創造數字資產庫存，並抱怨它將包括BTC以外的其他硬幣。

Some BTC maximalists, like Michael Saylor, are embracing the idea of a government stockpile of digital assets. Others, like those at Bitcoin Magazine, are launching social media campaigns against it.

像邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor）這樣的一些BTC最大化主義者正在擁護政府庫存數字資產的想法。其他人，例如比特幣雜誌的人，也在針對它發起社交媒體運動。

The contrast is easily explainable: Saylor is a businessman, while many old-guard BTC maximalists have never produced real value or played politics at this level.

對比很容易解釋：Saylor是一名商人，而許多老式的BTC最大化主義者從未產生真正的價值或在此層面上發揮政治作用。

It wasn't just BTC maximalists who opposed the proposed digital asset reserve. Many of President Trump's political opponents tried to link it to attempts to enrich himself and his family.

不僅反對擬議的數字資產儲備的BTC最大主義者。特朗普總統的許多政治反對者試圖將其與豐富自己和家人的企圖聯繫起來。

After the launch of Trump memecoins on Solana, both of which have completely collapsed in short order, this isn't a stretch.

特朗普在索拉納（Solana）上推出了特朗普（Trump Memecoins）之後，這兩者都在短時間完全崩潰了，這並不是一件很遠的地方。

Jack Mallers accuses Ripple of undermining BTC

傑克·馬洛爾（Jack Mallers）指責波紋破壞BTC

While most BTC die-hards are upset by the inclusion of other digital currencies period, they are particularly irked by the fact Ripple's XRP is in the lineup.

雖然大多數BTC頑固分子都因包含其他數字貨幣時期而感到沮喪，但它們對Ripple的XRP在陣容中特別感到不滿。

Trump made it clear that American-made digital assets will receive preferential treatment and Ripple's CEO Brad Garlinghouse wasted no time highlighting how Ripple is an American company and also supporting a diversified approach.

特朗普明確表示，美國製造的數字資產將獲得優惠待遇，而Ripple的首席執行官布拉德·加林豪斯（Brad Garlinghouse）毫不猶豫地強調了Ripple是一家美國公司，並支持多元化的方法。

Jack Mallers, who contributed significantly to the Lightning Network, released a video on X accusing Ripple of undermining American prosperity, freedom, and BTC.

為閃電網絡做出了重大貢獻的傑克·馬拉斯（Jack Mallers）發布了一段視頻，該視頻指責漣漪破壞了美國的繁榮，自由和BTC。

Claiming a BTC reserve would be “one of the most important economic announcements in American history,” Mallers accused Ripple of spending millions of dollars to undermine the idea and promote XRP instead.

聲稱BTC儲備將是“美國歷史上最重要的經濟公告之一”，Mallers指責Ripple花費了數百萬美元來破壞這一想法並促進XRP。

Apparently, it's fine to lobby the government as long as it's for your preferred digital currency, but if anybody else does it, it's a scam.

顯然，只要是您首選的數字貨幣，遊說政府就可以遊說，但是如果其他人這樣做，那就是一個騙局。

Showing how divorced from reality many BTC maximalists are, Mallers claimed that BTC is “owned, operated, and governed by the people.”

馬爾（Mallers）表明，許多BTC最大化主義者是如何與現實離婚的，他聲稱BTC是“由人民擁有，經營和統治的”。

The truth is the top 100 BTC wallets control over 14% of the supply, and the top five mining operations control 85% of the hash power. This is the furthest thing from money for and by the people that has ever existed.

事實是，超過14％的供應量控制了前100個BTC錢包，前五名採礦作業控制著85％的哈希功率。這是從有史以來的人們和曾經存在的人們的資金最遠的事情。

This is all the fault of the small blockers

這是小型阻滯劑的錯

Before the BTC/BCH split, Bitcoin had 90% of the value in the digital currency industry, with only a handful of competitors.

在BTC/BCH拆分之前，比特幣在數字貨幣行業中擁有90％的價值，只有少數競爭對手。

Since the split, no Bitcoin fork has ever achieved 90% dominance again, and tens of thousands of blockchains have sprung up, offering tens of millions of tokens.

自分裂以來，沒有比特幣叉再次實現了90％的統治地位，成千上萬的區塊鏈已經彈起，提供了數千萬的令牌。

This sad state of affairs could have been avoided had small blockers agreed to raise the block size and leave Satoshi's original design alone.

如果小型阻止者同意提高障礙物的規模，並獨自將薩托島的原始設計留下來，則可以避免這種悲傷的狀況。

As demonstrated on BSV today, the original Bitcoin implementation could always scale on-chain, Satoshi's opcodes allowed for a plethora of transaction types, and it was always possible to build apps that use the coin natively on the blockchain, generating fee revenue for miners for years and decades to come.

如今天BSV所示，原始的比特幣實施始終可以擴展鍊鍊，Satoshi的Opcodes允許使用大量的交易類型，並且總是有可能構建在區塊鏈上使用硬幣的應用程序，為礦工生成費用收入，為礦工生成費用。幾十年來。

Rather than acknowledge this, small blockers were and still are fixated on so-called decentralization. Blocks had to stay small enough so that anyone could run a node, they claimed, even though Satoshi Nakamoto had dismissed that idea.

與其認識到這一點，不如說，小型阻滯劑一直被固定在所謂的權力下放。他們聲稱，儘管薩托伊族人已經駁回了這個想法，但街區必須保持足夠小，以便任何人都可以運行節點。

With the subsequent SegWit and Taproot updates and their insistence on scaling via convoluted, flawed solutions like the Lightning Network, BTC maximalists opened the door for others to step in with blockchain solutions to the problems they created.

隨後的Segwit和Taproot更新及其堅持通過諸如Lightning Network等複雜的，有缺陷的解決方案進行擴展，BTC Maximalists為其他人打開了大門，以解決他們所創造的問題的區塊鏈解決方案。

Now, they have no other option than to cry about it as their dream of seizing American taxpayer money to pump their bags dissipates, and their bags only slip away.

現在，他們別無選擇，只能哭泣，因為他們夢想著抓住美國納稅人的錢來抽煙，而他們的行李只溜走了。

It seems the Number Go Up crew will have to make do with a percentage of the loot, and they'll have to share the gains with the XRP Army and others.

看來，船員的數字將不得不用一定比例的戰利品來賺錢，他們必須與XRP軍隊和其他人分享收益。

The irony is that they cannot see how, to most rational people, their favorite coin is of no more inherent value than any of the others. BTC is no better than XRP, but to them, saying so is heresy.

具有諷刺意味的是，他們看不到，對於大多數理性的人來說，他們最喜歡的硬幣的固有價值比其他任何一個都沒有。 BTC並不比XRP更好，但是對他們來說，這是異端的。

Saifedean Ammous can write endless books, Michael Saylor can talk gibberish on CNBC until the cows come home, and Max Keiser can grow old yelling and pontificating on RT, but nothing will change the fact that these very same people broke Bitcoin, and in doing so, they created the ‘crypto’ they are being forced to share the ultimate victory with. Talk about poetic justice!

塞菲德人的寬容可以寫無盡的書，邁克爾·賽勒（Michael Saylor）可以在CNBC上說話，直到奶牛回家為止，Max Keizer可以在RT上大喊大叫和影響，但是沒有什麼會改變這些事實，這些事實是，這些人都違反了比特幣，並且這樣做是這樣。 ，他們創建了“加密”，他們被迫與最終的勝利分享。談論詩意的正義！