比特幣免受量子風險，專家否認迫在眉睫的威脅

CryptoQuant 的創始人兼執行長 Ki Young Ju 最近解決了人們對量子電腦可能破壞比特幣安全的持續擔憂。

CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju has reassured the public that there is no immediate threat to Bitcoin from quantum computers. He added that he did not think it would happen this decade, or in the next one at least to the likes of Bitcoin.

CryptoQuant 執行長 Ki Young Ju 向公眾保證，量子電腦不會對比特幣造成直接威脅。他補充說，他認為這不會在本十年發生，或者至少在下一個十年不會發生，至少對於像比特幣這樣的事情來說是如此。

Ju also cautioned against the spread of FUD from the likes of people who may not have adequate information about the matter in question.

Ju 還警告說，不要從那些可能對相關問題沒有足夠資訊的人那裡傳播 FUD。

Even Adam Back, a cryptographer, and the creator of the Bitcoin Proof of Work algorithm agreed with these statements. Back recalled that the existing quantum technology is insufficient to crack Bitcoin’s encryption.

就連密碼學家、比特幣工作量證明演算法的創作者 Adam Back 也同意這些說法。 Back回憶說，現有的量子技術不足以破解比特幣的加密。

He noted that it is a mistake to think that improving the number of quantum bits or qubits in a quantum computer would lead to improved entanglement, which is crucial in quantum computing.

他指出，認為提高量子電腦中的量子位元數或量子位元數會改善糾纏是錯誤的，而糾纏在量子計算中至關重要。

He said that even if there are huge improvements, the technology to hack Bitcoin remains a thing of the future. Instead, it is noteworthy that according to all the above-considered approaches, the necessary breakthroughs are, in fact, several orders of magnitude further on. It would take approximately 50 years to get a machine with the threatening capability of Bitcoin based on the rate of advancement in quantum computing, according to Back.

他表示，即使有巨大的進步，破解比特幣的技術仍然是未來的事情。相反，值得注意的是，根據上述所有方法，所需的突破實際上還需要幾個數量級。 Back 表示，根據量子運算的進步速度，大約需要 50 年才能獲得具有比特幣威脅能力的機器。

Back stated that it is possible if a new technology is developed then the situation may alter. That is, if something exciting or new occurs in the field of quantum computing, the status of the situation, the balance of power, might change. Nevertheless, for now, there is no urgent danger that could threaten Bitcoin’s stability in connection with quantum computers.

Back表示，如果新技術被開發出來，情況可能會改變。也就是說，如果量子計算領域發生令人興奮的或新的事情，情況的狀態、力量的平衡可能會改變。儘管如此，目前還不存在可能威脅比特幣與量子電腦相關穩定性的緊急危險。

Furthermore, it is possible to establish the current security measures applied to Bitcoin withstanding the challenges. While quantum computing is on the rise, so is the work in the crypto community on the creation of new types of encryption that may help to counteract potential quantum threats. Consequently, it makes no sense to predict that Bitcoin will be at the mercy of quantum computers any time soon.

此外，有可能建立適用於比特幣的當前安全措施來應對挑戰。雖然量子運算正在興起，但加密社群中創建新型加密技術的工作也在興起，這可能有助於應對潛在的量子威脅。因此，預測比特幣很快就會受到量子電腦的支配是沒有意義的。

Therefore, Ki Young Ju and other analysts and experts, such as Adam Back have dismissed the idea that quantum computers are an imminent threat to Bitcoin. The decryption of Bitcoin is still some ways off in terms of the technology available. Although quantum computing research may change this situation in the future, at present, it does not pose any threat. For now, Bitcoin is safe and the public should not let itself be worked up by sensationalism.

因此，Ki Young Ju 和 Adam Back 等其他分析師和專家駁斥了量子電腦對比特幣構成迫在眉睫的威脅的觀點。就現有技術而言，比特幣的解密還有很長的路要走。儘管量子運算研究未來可能會改變這種狀況，但目前來看，還沒有構成任何威脅。目前，比特幣是安全的，大眾不應該被聳人聽聞的情緒所激動。