比特幣儲備或美國硬幣：美國面臨數位貨幣困境

這位直言不諱的經濟學家，長期批評加密貨幣，再次表達了他對美國戰略比特幣儲備（SBR）的反對。

Outspoken economist Peter Schiff, who has consistently voiced his opposition to a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) for the United States, recently presented an alternative solution to electronic currency.

直言不諱的經濟學家彼得·希夫（Peter Schiff）一直表示反對美國戰略比特幣儲備（SBR），最近提出了電子貨幣的替代解決方案。

During an appearance on X, Schiff proposed the creation of the “USA Coin,” which he claims could save the country vast sums of money. The coin's supply would be limited to 21 million, mirroring that of Bitcoin. However, to facilitate payments, Schiff suggested integrating the coin into a revamped blockchain.

在 X 節目中，希夫提議創造“美國硬幣”，他聲稱這可以為國家節省大量資金。該幣的供應量將限制在 2,100 萬枚，與比特幣的供應量相同。然而，為了方便支付，希夫建議將代幣整合到改進的區塊鏈中。

This proposal adds to Schiff's ongoing critiques of a Bitcoin reserve. He recently urged President Biden to sell the nation's Bitcoin holdings, dismissing the concept of a SBR as nonsense.

這項提議加劇了希夫對比特幣儲備的持續批評。他最近敦促拜登總統出售該國持有的比特幣，並將 SBR 的概念視為無稽之談。

While Schiff expresses skepticism, the idea of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is gaining traction among policymakers and economists. Senator Cynthia Lummis is spearheading the Bitcoin Act of 2024, driven by the belief that BTC can help reduce the national debt, which currently stands at $36 trillion. Lummis anticipates that a substantial portion of the debt may be offset in the future.

儘管希夫表示懷疑，但比特幣戰略儲備的想法正在受到政策制定者和經濟學家的關注。參議員 Cynthia Lummis 相信 BTC 可以幫助減少目前 36 兆美元的國家債務，因此正在帶頭制定 2024 年比特幣法案。 Lummis 預計未來很大一部分債務可能會被抵消。

Moreover, according to projections made by Matthew Sigel of VanEck, Bitcoin reserves could decrease the national debt to 36% by 2050, highlighting the vast financial potential attributed to Bitcoin.

此外，根據 VanEck 的 Matthew Sigel 的預測，到 2050 年，比特幣儲備可以將國家債務減少至 36%，凸顯了比特幣的巨大金融潛力。

However, Schiff's critiques extend beyond the reserve. Nic Carter of Castle Island Ventures also voiced concerns, arguing that the reserve would debase the US Dollar rather than enhance its value. In this regard, he aligns with Schiff's view that Bitcoin cannot serve as a reserve.

然而，希夫的批評超出了保留範圍。 Castle Island Ventures 的 Nick Carter 也表達了擔憂，認為儲備將導緻美元貶值，而不是升值。在這方面，他同意希夫的觀點，比特幣不能作為儲備。

These differing perspectives further illustrate the widening divergence in the United States' economic policies concerning digital currencies. The debate continues over whether the country should establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve or pursue alternatives like Schiff's USA Coin, leaving the future of Bitcoin within the United States' financial system uncertain.

這些不同的觀點進一步說明了美國在數位貨幣方面的經濟政策日益擴大的分歧。關於該國是否應該建立戰略比特幣儲備或尋求像希夫的美國硬幣這樣的替代品的爭論仍在繼續，這使得比特幣在美國金融體系中的未來充滿不確定性。