![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
the price impact of large trades. Back runners place their orders after the victim’s trade, but still within the same block, to benefit from the price movement triggered by the victim’s trade.
Back-running is a strategy that is often used in conjunction with front-running. It involves observing a large trade in the mempool and placing an order in the same direction, but later in the block. This strategy benefits from the price movement caused by the victim’s trade, but without the risk of being front-run.
Back-running is typically less profitable than front-running, as the price impact of a trade diminishes over time. However, it is still a viable strategy, especially when the victim’s trade is particularly large.
Sandwich Attack
A sandwich attack is a type of MEV strategy that involves placing two trades around a victim’s trade to profit from the price impact. The searcher first identifies a victim’s trade in the mempool and places a buy or sell order before it, and then places another order in the opposite direction after the victim’s trade.
Sandwich attacks are a more advanced and profitable form of MEV strategy. They involve identifying a large trade in the mempool and placing two orders around it, one before and one after. The goal is to capture the price impact of the victim’s trade on both sides.
In this example, the searcher observed a pending sell trade for 100 SOL, which is likely to drive down the price of SOL. To capitalize on this, the searcher placed a buy trade for 50 SOL before the victim's trade, and then a sell trade for 50 SOL after the victim's trade. As a result, the searcher was able to buy at a lower price and sell at a higher price, making a profit of 0.0002 SOL (about $0.04) per sandwich transaction.
Solana MEV Data
Below is a collection of relevant, quantifiable, and contextual data to illustrate the current scope and impact of MEV in Solana.
Jito Bundles
Jito bundles are the primary method for seekers to ensure profitable transaction ordering. However, Jito data does not cover the full spectrum of MEV activity; in particular, it does not capture seeker profits or activity through alternative mempools. In addition, many applications use Jito for non-MEV purposes, such as bypassing priority fees to ensure timely inclusion of transactions.
Jito has processed more than 3 billion transaction bundles over the past year, generating a total of 3.75 million SOL in tips. This activity has shown a clear upward trend, from a low of 781 SOL in tips on January 11, 2024, to 60,801 SOL on November 19.
Jito Arbitrage Detection
Jito’s arbitrage detection algorithm analyzes all Solana transactions, including those outside of the Jito bundle, and has identified more than 90.44 million successful arbitrage trades over the past year. The average profit per arbitrage was $1.58, while the single most profitable arbitrage trade generated $3.7 million in gains, and these arbitrage trades generated a total of $142.8 million in profits.
DeezNode Sandwich Transactions
DeezNode runs a sandwich trading bot on an address starting with vpeNAL. Jito's internal analysis shows that almost half of the sandwich attacks against Solana can be attributed to this program. During a 30-day period (December 7 to January 5), the program performed 1.55 million sandwich transactions, making a profit of 65,880 SOL (about $13.43 million), with an average profit of 0.0425 SOL (about $8.67) per sandwich transaction. On an annual basis, the program will generate a profit of more than 801,500 SOL per year.
MEV Mitigation Mechanisms
Finally, let’s explore some strategies and mechanisms that are being considered to reduce or eliminate harmful forms of MEV.
Whitelisting
Whitelisting is a common approach to combating bad actors, especially those engaging in harmful MEV extraction practices. This approach involves identifying and whitelisting a set of trusted validators or transactions, while blocking or delaying transactions from other parties.
However, whitelisting can introduce several problems. Firstly, it may lead to a semi-permissioned and censored environment, which goes against the decentralized philosophy of the blockchain industry. Secondly, whitelisting can delay transaction processing, affecting the user experience, especially during periods of high network activity.
Multiple Concurrent Leaders (MCL)
The Multiple Concurrent Leaders (MCL) system offers a promising long-term solution to the pernicious MEV problem by allowing users to choose between leaders without incurring delays. If leader A acts maliciously, users can redirect their transactions to honest leader B.
However,
免責事項:info@kdj.com
提供される情報は取引に関するアドバイスではありません。 kdj.com は、この記事で提供される情報に基づいて行われた投資に対して一切の責任を負いません。暗号通貨は変動性が高いため、十分な調査を行った上で慎重に投資することを強くお勧めします。
このウェブサイトで使用されているコンテンツが著作権を侵害していると思われる場合は、直ちに当社 (info@kdj.com) までご連絡ください。速やかに削除させていただきます。