As the Waves of Economic Uncertainty Overwhelm the Markets, the World of Crypto Holds Its Breath

Circle, a giant in the stablecoin space, sways between ambition and caution. Its IPO project, although firmly grounded, could sink

The world of crypto is holding its breath as waves of economic uncertainty continue to batter the markets.

As Circle, a giant in the stablecoin space, prepares for its IPO, it finds itself swaying between ambition and caution.

With an impressive revenue of $1.67 billion in 2024, up 16% year-on-year, and a market capitalization that has surpassed $60 billion, Circle boasts an audacious health.

However, behind these figures lies a paradox: the company, issuer of the USDC, hesitates to cross the stock market Rubicon.

Registered with the SEC on April 1, it now skids, waiting for signals from a market in decay.

The announcement of Trump’s radical tariffs, on April 2, evaporated $2 trillion in valuation within 24 hours, a tsunami for investors.

The VIX index, a gauge of fear, soars to 41, a level synonymous with panic. Traditional assets tremble, while cryptos oscillate between refuge and risk.

In this climate, Circle prefers to play the waiting game. Like Klarna and StubHub, who are also postponing their IPOs, the company fears its market entry might turn into a shipwreck.

The promising symbol CRCL remains in limbo, and no price or share volume has yet been set, in a move that could be seen as a strategic blur or an admission of vulnerability.

Crypto at a Crossroads: Refuge or Scapegoat?

“We fear a recession,” alerts the founder of ARK Invest. Her diagnosis, shared by many players, resonates like a death knell.

The speed of money circulation is slowing, foreign counter-tariffs threaten, and the USDC, although pegged to the dollar, is not immune to the turmoil.

Stablecoins, designed to stabilize, are now shaken by political tremors. Trumpian tariffs are not just a trade war; they redefine the rules of the economic game.

In reaction, investors flee to gold, government bonds… and paradoxically, to certain cryptos. The USDC, backed by liquid reserves, embodies this dual movement: both a victim and a beneficiary of distrust.

The postponement of Circle’s IPO is not an isolated incident but a symptom. It reveals a structural distrust towards public markets, perceived as too volatile arenas.

However, crypto has long dreamed of stock market legitimacy. Today, it hesitates: should it conquer traditional finance or cultivate its disruptive marginality?

The recent drops in Bitcoin, followed by its rebounds, show that the answer is not clear-cut.

If Circle takes the plunge despite the risks, its IPO could become a symbol of resilience. Conversely, a prolonged delay would signify the lasting grip of macroeconomic uncertainties on crypto.

Between the two, a third path emerges: that of silent adaptation. Decentralized protocols, less dependent on political moods, are gaining ground.

What if the real revolution was not in stock prices but in the escape from regulatory radars? Only time will tell.