![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Cryptocurrency News Articles
Using Quantum Computing to Recover Bitcoin Keys is Unethical
Mar 17, 2025 at 02:24 pm
Bitcoin (BTC) is a very scarce digital resource with a hard cap of 21 million. The numbers significantly go down when considering the amount holders have lost through time due to lost and unrecoverable private keys.
Experts have estimated that around 3 million to 4 million Bitcoin (BTC) have been lost forever. The optimistic estimate cuts the total supply to 17 million.
Some experts believe that quantum computing could be used to recover the lost Bitcoin. However, Jameson Lopp, a cypherpunk and Casa co-founder and Chief Security Officer, has argued against the idea.
Setting aside the fact that present quantum computers do not yet possess the processing power to break the cryptographic functions used in blockchain networks like Bitcoin, Lopp said that using the technology for such a purpose would be unethical.
According to SEALSQ, it takes 10 minutes to mine a Bitcoin block. Meanwhile, scientific estimates suggest that present quantum computers have the capability to hack a Bitcoin signature in 30 minutes.
“We’re still a long way away from quantum computers being able to decrypt anything quickly enough to matter. But if we were to reach that point, I think it would be a bad idea to use that technology to attempt to recover lost bitcoin,” said Lopp.
The expert explained that the process would undermine the integrity of the protocol and contradict Bitcoin’s ethos of censorship resistance, conservatism, and transaction immutability. It would also violate the dogma, “Not your keys, not your coins.”
Moreover, Lopp said that allowing such technology to violate the cryptographic nature of Bitcoin would only promote wealth redistribution in favor of those who have won the quantum computing race.
“Allowing quantum recovery of bitcoin is tantamount to wealth redistribution. What we would be allowing is for bitcoin to be redistributed from those who are ignorant of quantum computers to those who have won the technological race to acquire quantum computers,” said the expert.
Nonetheless, Lopp pointed out that using quantum computing to derive private keys from public keys is not “hacking.” It is a process that only utilizes what’s mathematically possible within BTC’s current code.
“One of the points of laws is that they can be amended to mitigate risk. We can burn all bitcoin in quantum-vulnerable addresses and adopt quantum-resistant wallets,” he added.
Disclaimer:info@kdj.com
The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!
If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Cardano (ADA) Founder Charles Hoskinson Takes Shots at Ethereum (ETH), Contrasting Its Slow Upgrade Process
- Mar 17, 2025 at 07:25 pm
- input: This article captures my entire point about the need for things like Voltaire https://t.co/JkG7iuOBfKOnchain governance allows us to delegate authority to leaders where and when necessary to solve hard problems and evolve the ecosystem. The absence of governance means
-