 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Cryptocurrency News Articles
Infini’s 50 million U.S. dollars was stolen. The founder is responsible for the loss. Can the withdrawal request be responded to in time?
Feb 24, 2025 at 05:35 pm
On February 24, Infini was stolen for $50 million, and the founder provided a guarantee. It involves many issues and risks such as reinvestment of funds, withdrawal response, and business upgrades.
Infini Fund theft incidents
On February 24, Infini founder Christian posted on social media that Infini suffered $50 million stolen. 70% of them belong to friends around them. The founder has communicated with them one by one and said that he personally bears possible losses. The news has attracted widespread attention.
The consideration behind the founder's bottom line
The founder decides to provide personal guarantees, and there are many considerations behind this behavior. On the one hand, it is crucial to maintain relationships with friends from big players, who may play a key role in the development of Infini; on the other hand, they also want to stabilize the confidence of the entire platform and avoid the spread of panic.
Details of the reinvestment plan
The remaining funds will be reinvested into Infini vault by next Monday. This plan aims to quickly restore the flow of funds on the platform and bring the business back on track. However, the reinvestment process involves many links, such as fund accounting, risk assessment, etc., and needs to be carried out with caution.
Discussion on the response mechanism of withdrawal requirements
Regarding withdrawal needs, the founder declared that the funds were ready to respond at any time. However, in actual operation, the response speed will be restricted by a variety of factors, such as fund allocation process, bank processing efficiency, etc., which will affect whether users can withdraw money in a timely manner.
Challenges facing business upgrades
Infini plans to upgrade its business to ensure that funds are absolutely safe. However, the upgrade process faces challenges such as technical difficulties and human resources investment. Finding suitable technical solutions and allocating professional and technical personnel requires time and resources.
Specific measures for financial security
To ensure the security of funds, a series of measures may be taken in the future, such as strengthening technical protection and adopting more advanced encryption algorithms; improving internal management mechanisms and strictly controlling authority; introducing third-party supervision to enhance transparency.
The attitude and influence of big friends
The attitude of big friends in this incident is key. Although they have received the founder's guarantee, their trust in the platform may change after experiencing this. Its subsequent decisions may affect the scale and development trend of the platform's funds.
The concerns and reactions of ordinary users
Ordinary users will inevitably feel worried when facing this incident. I am worried about the safety of my funds and doubt the future stability of the platform. Their reaction may be reflected in withdrawal behavior, evaluation of the platform, etc.
The impact of platform reputation
The $50 million theft incident seriously impacted the credibility of the Infini platform. In a fiercely competitive market environment, impaired reputation will make it more difficult for the platform to attract new users and increase the risk of churn of old users.
Comparative analysis with other similar events
Compared with other similar incidents of theft of funds, Infini's incident has its own uniqueness. For example, it is rare for founders to protect themselves, and the response strategies and final results adopted by different platforms when dealing with such incidents are different.
Risk assessment of reinvestment of funds
Although reinvestment of funds is a key step in restoring business, it also poses risks. Market fluctuations, uncertainty in investment projects, etc. may lead to losses of reinvested funds, affecting the platform's subsequent operations.
Possible problems with withdrawal process
There may be problems with the withdrawal process in actual operations. For example, system failure leads to backlog of withdrawal applications and cumbersome and sluggish manual review process, which may make withdrawal requirements unable to be responded in time.
Potential impact of business upgrades on withdrawals
During business upgrades, there may be potential impact on withdrawals. System updates may cause the withdrawal request to be temporarily unable to be processed, and new business rules may change the withdrawal conditions and procedures.
Analysis of the founder's ability to fulfill his promise
The founder promises to bear the losses and respond to withdrawal needs, and his ability to fulfill his commitments is worthy of analysis. Factors such as the founder’s personal asset status, fundraising channels, and the platform’s future profitability need to be considered.
Disclaimer:info@kdj.com
The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research！
If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.
Other articles published on Feb 24, 2025
-
- With native multi-signature support, why does Justin Sun strongly recommend depositing large amounts of USDT on the Tron blockchain?
- Feb 24, 2025 at 05:52 pm
- Justin Sun strongly recommends depositing large USDT on Tron blockchain because its USDT is guaranteed, native multi-signature support, transparent transactions, convenient operation, and more secure and reliable asset storage.
-
- Bybit suffered a $1.5 billion hack, the largest theft in crypto history? Learn more in one article!
- Feb 24, 2025 at 05:50 pm
- Bybit was hacked and more than $1.5 billion in crypto assets were stolen, setting a record for the largest theft in crypto history. Hackers used malicious contracts and social engineering to manipulate transactions and transferred a large amount of ETH and stETH.
-
- Justin Sun recommends storing large amounts of USDT on the Tron blockchain. What are the advantages of cold multi-signature?
- Feb 24, 2025 at 05:48 pm
- Justin Sun recommends that large USDT be stored in Tron blockchains with cold multi-signature. Its advantages cover many aspects such as security, transparency, cost, compliance, community support and market recognition.
-
- Infini’s 50 million U.S. dollars was stolen. The founder is responsible for the loss. Can the withdrawal request be responded to in time?
- Feb 24, 2025 at 05:36 pm
- On February 24, Infini was stolen for $50 million, and the founder provided a guarantee. It involves many issues and risks such as reinvestment of funds, withdrawal response, and business upgrades.
-
- The founder of Infini said that he would bear 70% of the losses and the remaining funds would be invested back next week. Can users rest assured?
- Feb 24, 2025 at 05:28 pm
- Infini's $50 million was stolen, and the founder said he would bear 70% of the loss and invested back the remaining funds next week. Although he said that liquidity and other issues were fine, users were still worried about the security of funds and the future of the platform.
-
- From Mt. Gox to Bybit: An in-depth review of cryptocurrency exchange security incidents
- Feb 22, 2025 at 02:54 pm
- An in-depth review of cryptocurrency exchange security incidents from Mt. Gox to Bybit, covering the attack details, hacker methods, stolen assets and capital flows, as well as official responses and subsequent processing, showing the industry's security issues and response measures.
-
- Bybit was stolen for 1.5 billion. Where is the security of the cryptocurrency industry going?
- Feb 22, 2025 at 01:45 pm
- Bybit's monumental $1.5 billion hack has dealt a devastating blow to cryptocurrency security, eroding trust in digital assets and raising concerns about industry-wide inadequacies in regulatory oversight and security measures.
-
- After the Pascal hard fork, there are Lorentz and Maxwell upgrades. What are the differences between them?
- Feb 21, 2025 at 05:25 pm
- In 2025, BNB Chain will carry out Pascal hard fork and Lorentz and Maxwell upgrades, which will have differences in performance and security, and will have a wide impact.
-
- When will the BNB Smart Chain Pascal hard fork upgrade start? Is the mainnet and testnet time the same?
- Feb 21, 2025 at 05:16 pm
- BNB Smart Chain will be upgraded on February 25, the main network will be upgraded in mid-March, and there will be subsequent upgrades in April and June, bringing various functions improvements.
