Market Cap: $2.1532T -0.32%
Volume(24h): $35.0938B -46.31%
  • Market Cap: $2.1532T -0.32%
  • Volume(24h): $35.0938B -46.31%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.1532T -0.32%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87959.907984 USD

1.34%

ethereum
ethereum

$2920.497338 USD

3.04%

tether
tether

$0.999775 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.237324 USD

8.12%

bnb
bnb

$860.243768 USD

0.90%

solana
solana

$138.089498 USD

5.43%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999807 USD

0.01%

tron
tron

$0.272801 USD

-1.53%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.150904 USD

2.96%

cardano
cardano

$0.421635 USD

1.97%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$32.152445 USD

2.23%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$533.301069 USD

-1.94%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.953417 USD

2.68%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.535951 USD

0.73%

zcash
zcash

$521.483386 USD

-2.87%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Bitcoin Bridging: Limitations of Past Approaches and the Potential for the Broader DeFi Space

Jan 14, 2025 at 10:01 pm

Bitcoin Bridging: Limitations of Past Approaches and the Potential for the Broader DeFi Space

Despite the growing demand for decentralized bridges to facilitate crosschain transactions, Bitcoin has faced unique challenges due to its limited scripting language and strict consensus rules. This has hindered efforts to integrate Bitcoin into the broader decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.

However, recent advances in Bitcoin Virtual Machine (BitVM) protocols aim to address these limitations and open up new possibilities for Bitcoin bridging. In an exclusive interview with Cointelegraph, Sergio Lerner, science specialist at RootstockLabs, discussed these developments and their implications for the DeFi space.

Highlighting the limitations of past approaches to Bitcoin bridging, Lerner explained that Bitcoin's scripting language was not designed to support the complex computations needed for validating crosschain transactions.

“Bitcoin did not have a language expressive enough to support [decentralized bridges],” he said.

This constraint has limited efforts to build fully decentralized and trust-minimized bridges.

While BitVM protocols can introduce disputable computing to verify complex computations on Bitcoin, early versions of these protocols were inefficient, and Lerner noted that some trade-offs must be considered.

“A limitation of every BitVM protocol is that it needs covenants for Bitcoin, and without covenants, they must emulate them with a committee that co-signs a set of transactions,” he said.

This approach introduces trusted parties into the system, as at least one committee member must act honestly to maintain security.

“This limitation does not exist in two-party protocols based on BitVMX, such as payment channels,” Lerner said. “It only arises when the protocol must provide an open service to other unknown parties.”

Lerner also mentioned BitVMX as an alternative method for Bitcoin bridging, which enables participation in broader blockchain applications.

“BitVMX is currently the cheapest and most resource-efficient disputable computing protocol for Bitcoin,” he said, adding that it could be used to build validating bridges for the network.

However, Lerner emphasized the importance of careful testing and deployment to mitigate risks, stating that any team rushing to deploy a BitVM-based system without proper testing “will be playing with users' money.”

Original source:cointelegraph

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Aug 02, 2026