声音区块链：技术架构，功能和与Solana的比较

加密世界有时可能会压倒一切，这么多项目一直在启动，每个项目都比其他项目好得多。

The crypto world can be at times overwhelming, with so many projects being launched all the time, each claiming to be so much better than others. It can be difficult to distinguish truth from hype and real value from hyperbole or marketing skills.

加密世界有时可能会压倒一切，这么多项目一直在启动，每个项目都比其他项目好得多。很难将真理与夸张或夸张或营销技能区分开来。

Yet, we can say with certainty that when it comes to one particular project, Sonic, there is no hyperbole or marketing, but real and hard value. The transition from Fantom Opera to Sonic, in August 2024, was more than a simple brand update. Sonic Labs introduced a new network architecture, an entirely new tokenomics model, and forward-looking developer incentives that are uncommon among existing blockchains.

但是，我们可以肯定地说，当涉及到一个特定项目时，声音，没有夸张或营销，而是真实而艰难的价值。 2024年8月，从幻想曲歌剧到Sonic的过渡不仅仅是一个简单的品牌更新。 Sonic Labs推出了一种新的网络体系结构，一种全新的令牌模型，以及在现有区块链中罕见的前瞻性开发人员激励措施。

Sonic is impressive because it is a Layer-1 solution, challenging the prevalence of Layer-2 scaling solutions, and it manages to be scalable and interoperable.

Sonic令人印象深刻，因为它是一种层1解决方案，挑战了第2层缩放解决方案的普遍性，并且可以可扩展和可互操作。

Our analysis here explores Sonic blockchain’s technical architecture, its relationship to Fantom, and how it compares with other prominent platforms like Solana and Uniswap. By examining these networks’ node operations, consensus mechanisms, DeFi capabilities, and performance metrics, we can better understand their unique contributions to the crypto blockchain world.

我们的分析在这里探讨了声音区块链的技术架构，与Fantom的关系以及与Solana和Uniswap等其他突出平台的比较。通过检查这些网络的节点操作，共识机制，DEFI功能和性能指标，我们可以更好地了解它们对加密区块链世界的独特贡献。

From Fantom to Sonic

从幻想到声音

Fantom launched in March 2020 as a high-performance blockchain designed to overcome the scalability and speed limitations that plagued earlier platforms. It quickly gained recognition for its speed, security, and scalability through its unique consensus mechanism called Lachesis, a specialized form of asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerant (aBFT) protocol. This technical foundation enabled Fantom to process transactions rapidly with minimal fees, making it particularly attractive for decentralized finance applications, supply chain solutions, and NFT projects.

Fantom于2020年3月推出，是一种高性能区块链，旨在克服困扰早期平台的可扩展性和速度限制。它通过其独特的共识机制称为Lachesis，以其速度，安全性和可伸缩性获得了认可，该机制称为Lachesis，这是一种专门的异步拜占庭式容错（ABFT）方案的专业形式。该技术基础使Fantom能够以最少的费用快速处理交易，从而使其对分散的金融应用，供应链解决方案和NFT项目特别有吸引力。

In late 2024, Fantom underwent a strategic transformation, rebranding itself as Sonic. The evolution wasn’t merely cosmetic but represented a fundamental shift in vision and technical approach. According to statements from the development team, the name “Sonic” was chosen to symbolize speed, interconnectedness, and a futuristic vision for blockchain technology. While Fantom had already established itself as a high performance network, Sonic aimed to elevate these capabilities further with enhanced infrastructure and expanded functionality.

在2024年底，Fantom进行了战略性的转变，将自己重新命名为Sonic。进化不仅仅是化妆品，而是视觉和技术方法的根本转变。根据开发团队的声明，选择“ Sonic”这个名字来象征速度，相互联系和对区块链技术的未来派愿景。尽管Fantom已经成为一个高性能网络，但Sonic旨在通过增强的基础架构和扩展的功能进一步提升这些功能。

The transition process included a token migration, allowing users to swap their original FTM tokens for the new S tokens at a 1:1 ratio. This approach ensured continuity for existing stakeholders while enabling the platform to evolve under its new identity. The migration preserved the ecosystem’s value and provided Sonic with a strong foundation for future growth and development.

过渡过程包括令牌迁移，使用户可以以1：1的比例将其原始FTM令牌换成新的S令牌。这种方法确保了现有利益相关者的连续性，同时使平台能够在其新身份下发展。迁移保留了生态系统的价值，并为未来的增长和发展提供了强大的基础。

Sonic Blockchain: Technical Architecture and Capabilities

声音区块链：技术架构和功能

Sonic functions as a Layer 1 (L1) blockchain with full compatibility with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), making it relatively straightforward for developers to deploy smart contracts and decentralized applications. Created specifically to address the growing demand for faster and more affordable networks, Sonic was designed with scalability and efficiency as foundational principles.

Sonic充当了与以太坊虚拟机（EVM）完全兼容的第1层（L1）区块链，这使开发人员部署智能合约和分散应用程序的开发人员相对简单。 Sonic专门为解决对更快，更负担得起的网络的需求不断增长而创建的，其设计具有可扩展性和效率为基础原理。

The consensus mechanism employed by Sonic utilizes a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) model, representing an evolution from Fantom’s original Lachesis protocol. This transition to PoS aligns with broader industry movements toward more energy-efficient consensus mechanisms. Under this system, validators stake the native S token to participate in transaction validation and block production, with economic incentives structured to ensure network security and reliability.

Sonic采用的共识机制采用了验证验证（POS）模型，代表了Fantom的原始Lachesis协议的演变。这种向POS的过渡与更广泛的行业运动朝着更节能的共识机制保持一致。在此系统下，验证者将本地人的标记列为参与交易验证并阻止生产，并采用经济激励措施来确保网络安全和可靠性。

One of Sonic’s most impressive technical claims relates to its transaction processing capabilities. According to available documentation, Sonic supports up to 10,000 transactions per second (TPS) with confirmation times of less than one second. Even more remarkable is its theoretical maximum TPS of 396,825, though real-world performance metrics currently show actual throughput averaging around 3.86 TPS. This significant gap between theoretical and actual performance is not unusual for newer blockchain platforms and typically narrows as the network matures and undergoes optimization.

Sonic最令人印象深刻的技术主张之一与其交易处理能力有关。根据可用的文档，Sonic每秒最多支持10,000笔交易（TPS），确认时间少于一秒钟。更为显着的是其396,825的理论最大TPS，尽管现实世界的性能指标目前显示了3.86 TP的实际吞吐量。对于较新的区块链平台而言，理论和实际性能之间的显着差距并不罕见，并且通常随着网络成熟并进行优化而缩小。

Transaction finality—the time after which a transaction becomes irreversible—is reported to be virtually instantaneous on Sonic, representing a substantial improvement over many competing blockchains. This rapid finality makes Sonic particularly well-suited for applications requiring quick settlement assurance, such as gaming platforms, financial services, and high-frequency trading systems.

据报道，交易的最终终结性是不可逆转的时间 - 在声音上实际上是瞬时的，这代表了许多竞争区块链的实质性改善。这种快速的终结性使声音特别适合需要快速和解保证的应用程序，例如游戏平台，金融服务和高频交易系统。

Governance on Sonic operates through an on-chain model, allowing token holders to participate directly in decision-making processes related to network parameters, protocol upgrades, and resource allocation. This approach differs from off-chain governance models used by some other blockchains and potentially offers greater transparency and community involvement in the platform’s evolution.

Sonic的治理是通过链模型运行的，使令牌持有人可以直接参与与网络参数，协议升级和资源分配有关的决策过程。这种方法不同于其他一些区块链使用的链链治理模型，并有可能在平台的发展中提供更大的透明度和社区参与。

Solana vs. Sonic: Comparative Technical Analysis

Solana与Sonic：比较技术分析

Solana and Sonic represent two distinct approaches to high-performance blockchain architecture. While both aim to provide scalable, efficient platforms for decentralized applications, they employ fundamentally different technical solutions to achieve these objectives.

Solana和Sonic代表了高性能区块链体系结构的两种不同的方法。尽管两者都旨在为分散应用程序提供可扩展，高效的平台，但它们从根本上采用了不同的技术解决方案来实现这些目标。

Solana, launched in March 2020, implements a unique consensus mechanism called Proof of History (PoH). This innovative approach enables the network to create a historical record of events and transactions, effectively timestamping them without requiring nodes to communicate extensively about timing. Combined with a Proof of Stake (PoS) validation system, Solana’s architecture enables a theoretical

索拉纳（Solana）于2020年3月推出，实施了一种独特的共识机制，称为历史证明（POH）。这种创新的方法使网络能够创建事件和交易的历史记录，有效地时间戳它们，而无需节点可以广泛地传达有关时间安排的信息。结合股份证明（POS）验证系统，Solana的体系结构可实现理论