Kaspa (KAS) 与 Ripple (XRP)：哪个是更好的加密项目？

Kaspa 和 Ripple 是两个加密项目，它们的运营和代表的含义截然不同。他们都拥有强大的社区，如果他们的看涨指标与他们保持一致，那么他们就有巨大收益的潜力。

Cryptocurrency project Kaspa (KAS) has been rallying lately, fueled by bullish technical indicators and a growing community. But a recent analysis by a crypto expert highlights the contrasting strengths of Kaspa and another prominent crypto project, Ripple (XRP).

在看涨的技术指标和不断增长的社区的推动下，加密货币项目 Kaspa (KAS) 最近一直在上涨。但加密专家最近的一项分析强调了 Kaspa 和另一个著名加密项目 Ripple (XRP) 的对比优势。

In a recent discussion on X (NYSE:PARA), crypto analyst Steven Schlangenreich raised interesting points regarding the two crypto projects and their contrasting characteristics. Kaspa, known for its true decentralization and community-driven approach, stands in stark contrast to XRP’s centralized structure and close relationship with traditional financial institutions.

在最近关于 X（纽约证券交易所股票代码：PARA）的讨论中，加密货币分析师 Steven Schlangenreich 提出了有关这两个加密货币项目及其对比特征的有趣观点。 Kaspa 以其真正的去中心化和社区驱动的方式而闻名，与 XRP 的中心化结构以及与传统金融机构的密切关系形成鲜明对比。

Schlangenreich points out that XRP’s large pre-mine and Ripple Labs’ vast holdings, coupled with the limited role of XRP users in the network’s governance, raise questions about XRP’s alignment with the foundational principles of cryptocurrency.

Schlangenreich 指出，XRP 的大量预挖和 Ripple Labs 的大量持有，加上 XRP 用户在网络治理中的有限作用，引发了人们对 XRP 是否符合加密货币基本原则的质疑。

Highlighting XRP’s centralization, he notes that a small group of insiders, including Ripple, control a majority of the token supply, which stands at 100 billion XRP. In contrast, Kaspa’s launch involved no pre-mining or venture capital, with the community retaining control over the network’s direction and governance.

他强调了 XRP 的中心化，并指出包括 Ripple 在内的一小部分内部人士控制着大部分代币供应，其数量为 1000 亿 XRP。相比之下，Kaspa 的发布不涉及预挖矿或风险投资，社区保留对网络方向和治理的控制权。

As Schlangenreich emphasizes, Kaspa’s unique approach to decentralization sets it apart. The project boasts an innovative BlockDAG technology that advances the proof-of-work concept, enhancing speed and scalability without compromising security.

正如 Schlangenreich 所强调的那样，Kaspa 独特的去中心化方法使其与众不同。该项目拥有创新的 BlockDAG 技术，该技术推进了工作量证明概念，在不影响安全性的情况下提高了速度和可扩展性。

Kaspa’s technological framework addresses the blockchain trilemma, aiming to achieve security, decentralization, and scalability simultaneously. Schlangenreich notes that XRP offers faster transactions than traditional banking systems, but Kaspa’s innovation extends beyond mere speed improvements to fundamental architectural advances.

Kaspa 的技术框架解决了区块链的三难困境，旨在同时实现安全性、去中心化和可扩展性。 Schlangenreich 指出，XRP 提供比传统银行系统更快的交易速度，但 Kaspa 的创新超越了单纯的速度改进，扩展到了基础架构的进步。

The contrasting strengths of XRP and Kaspa, as highlighted by Schlangenreich, embody a broader debate within the cryptocurrency community. Should the industry prioritize institutional integration and regulatory compliance, as exemplified by XRP? Or should it remain true to its revolutionary roots through projects like Kaspa that emphasize decentralization and technological innovation?

正如 Schlangenreich 所强调的，XRP 和 Kaspa 的对比优势体现了加密货币社区内更广泛的争论。行业是否应该像 XRP 那样优先考虑机构整合和监管合规？还是应该通过像 Kaspa 这样强调权力下放和技术创新的项目来忠于其革命根源？

This comparison ultimately challenges investors and enthusiasts to consider their vision for cryptocurrency’s future. As Schlangenreich suggests, the choice between XRP and Kaspa reflects a deeper decision about the values and direction of the entire crypto industry.

这种比较最终会促使投资者和爱好者思考他们对加密货币未来的愿景。正如 Schlangenreich 所言，XRP 和 Kaspa 之间的选择反映了对整个加密行业的价值观和方向的更深层次的决定。