X帝国空投和NFT分配问题：基于CPH的分配问题和公平性问题

表明您的 $X 代币已作为 NFT 分发的通知引起了人们对分发过程的担忧。尽管铸造了两个 NFT 并且拥有高达 17 亿的 CPH（后来增加到 157 亿），但您的代币分配似乎低于预期。

The notification indicating that your $X tokens were distributed as NFTs raises concerns about the process.

表明您的 $X 代币已作为 NFT 分发的通知引起了人们对该过程的担忧。

Despite minting two NFTs and having a high CPH of 1.7 billion (later increasing to 15.7 billion), your token allocation seems lower than expected.

尽管铸造了两个 NFT 并且拥有高达 17 亿的 CPH（后来增加到 157 亿），但您的代币分配似乎低于预期。

Even though there were no transactions, your initial CPH was significant, yet you received a limited number of NFTs. During the Chill Phase, despite maintaining a CPH of 1.7 billion, there was no visible NFT distribution, raising questions about missing tokens or NFTs that should have been allocated.

即使没有交易，您的初始 CPH 也很大，但您收到的 NFT 数量有限。在 Chill 阶段，尽管 CPH 保持在 17 亿，但没有明显的 NFT 分配，引发了关于缺失代币或本应分配的 NFT 的问题。

Significant discrepancies arise when comparing your allocation with other players who have lower CPH values (e.g., 800 million) but received substantial $X token amounts without any TON transactions. This indicates that factors beyond CPH might have influenced the distribution, possibly involving specific criteria or manual adjustments by the team.

将您的分配与具有较低 CPH 值（例如 8 亿）但在没有任何 TON 交易的情况下收到大量 X 美元代币金额的其他玩家进行比较时，会出现显着差异。这表明 CPH 之外的因素可能会影响分布，可能涉及特定标准或团队的手动调整。

The variation in token rewards among users with different activity levels and CPH suggests a potential lack of transparency in the allocation method. The current model may favor certain behaviors or conditions, raising questions about the overall fairness of the distribution process.

不同活动水平和 CPH 的用户之间代币奖励的差异表明分配方法可能缺乏透明度。当前的模型可能有利于某些行为或条件，引发对分配过程整体公平性的质疑。

Recommendations

建议

Clarification Request: Contact X-Empire's support or community managers to seek clarification on the criteria for $X token allocation.

澄清请求：联系 X-Empire 的支持或社区经理，寻求有关 $X 代币分配标准的澄清。

Community Feedback: Engage with other players to share experiences, as collective feedback may encourage the team to address these issues more thoroughly.

社区反馈：与其他玩家交流经验，因为集体反馈可能会鼓励团队更彻底地解决这些问题。

Evaluate Future Participation: Based on the team's response and the perceived fairness of the allocation method, assess whether continuing participation in X-Empire is worthwhile, especially if the distribution process remains unclear.

评估未来的参与：根据团队的回应和分配方法的公平性，评估继续参与X帝国是否值得，特别是在分配过程仍不清楚的情况下。

Conclusion The inconsistencies in the token allocation process and potential unfairness could affect player confidence in X-Empire's ecosystem. Your concerns are valid, considering your significant activity and investment in the game.

结论 代币分配过程的不一致和潜在的不公平可能会影响玩家对 X-Empire 生态系统的信心。考虑到您在游戏中的重要活动和投资，您的担忧是有道理的。