国会欢迎最高法院对WAQF修正案的临时救济

国会周四强烈欢迎最高法院对有争议的WAQF修正案的临时救济，将该立法称为“伪装成改革的报复性”的行为

The Congress party on Thursday expressed strong support for the Supreme Court’s decision to grant interim relief on the controversial Waqf Amendment Act. At a press conference, senior Congress leader and MP Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, along with fellow MP Imran Pratapgarhi, spoke at length about the implications of the Act.

国会党周四表示，对最高法院决定对有争议的WAQF修正案的临时救济作出大力支持。在新闻发布会上，国会高级领导人和国会议员Abhishek Manu Singhvi博士以及国会议员Imran Pratapgarhi详尽地谈到了该法案的含义。

Describing the legislation as an act of "retaliation disguised as reform," Singhvi said it was timed and structured to spite the Congress and had no real interest in administrative efficiency.

辛格维（Singhvi）将立法描述为“被伪装成改革的报复”的行为，他说，这是定时的，结构化了国会，并且对行政效率没有真正的兴趣。

"This is not reform, it's retaliation — precisely timed, deeply political, and constitutionally dubious," he asserted.

他断言：“这不是改革，而是报复 - 精确时机，政治性和宪法性可疑。”

The Congress MP further explained that the law was not about improving Waqf institutions, which are in a poor state despite being envisioned as autonomous bodies by the framers of the Constitution, but rather about "controlling them, reducing autonomy to protocol, and rewriting rights with bureaucratic ink."

国会议员进一步解释说，该法律并不是要改善WAQF机构，尽管宪法的制定者将其视为自治机构，但该机构处于贫困状态，而是关于“控制它们，减少协议的自主权，并用官僚上的墨水重写权利”。

Rejecting the notion that the Congress was standing up for a single community, Singhvi highlighted the party's broader objective of defending constitutional values.

辛格维拒绝国会为一个单一社区而奋斗的观念，强调了该党捍卫宪法价值的更广泛的目标。

"This is not a community issue. It's a constitutional one. Article 26 protects the rights of all religious denominations — and today, it's the Waqf, but tomorrow, it could be any institution, any faith, even your voice," he warned.

他警告说：“这不是一个社区问题。这是一个宪法上的问题。第26条保护了所有宗教派别的权利 - 今天，这是WAQF，但明天，这可能是任何机构，任何信仰，甚至是您的声音。”

Slamming the government's claims of inclusivity, Singhvi said a "token Muslim presence on a board isn't representation — it's appropriation." He added that the Act renders religious identity a liability and turns faith-based institutions into government-controlled entities.

辛格维（Singhvi）抨击政府的包容性主张，说“穆斯林在董事会上的存在不是代表，而是拨款。”他补充说，该法案使宗教身份成为责任，并将基于信仰的机构变成政府控制的实体。

"The law is morally hollow and we are grateful to the court for understanding that. You cannot amputate Article 26 and call it reform," Singhvi stated.

辛格维说：“法律在道德上是空洞的，我们感谢法院理解这一点。你不能截肢第26条，并将其称为改革。”

Pratapgarhi also expressed gratitude for the court's intervention, noting that the government had rammed the bill through Parliament despite opposition input being ignored in both the JPC and legislative debates.

Pratapgarhi还对法院的干预表示感谢，并指出，尽管在JPC和立法辩论中都忽略了反对派投入，但政府还是通过议会遭到了法案。

Both leaders called for continued scrutiny of the Act, setting a dangerous precedent for minority rights and religious freedom in the country.

两位领导人都呼吁继续审查该法案，为该国的少数群体权利和宗教自由树立危险的先例。