bitcoin
bitcoin

$94127.18 USD 

0.35%

ethereum
ethereum

$3063.22 USD 

-2.20%

tether
tether

$1.00 USD 

-0.03%

solana
solana

$232.63 USD 

-4.46%

bnb
bnb

$604.55 USD 

-2.20%

xrp
xrp

$1.08 USD 

-1.39%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.371832 USD 

-11.04%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999776 USD 

-0.03%

cardano
cardano

$0.794461 USD 

7.91%

tron
tron

$0.194327 USD 

-4.52%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000024 USD 

-9.01%

avalanche
avalanche

$33.24 USD 

-4.56%

toncoin
toncoin

$5.25 USD 

-4.72%

sui
sui

$3.48 USD 

-8.71%

chainlink
chainlink

$14.30 USD 

-3.77%

加密货币新闻

Coinbase 的胜利:加密货币二级销售摆脱了证券的束缚

2024/04/07 11:36

美国法院承认加密货币二次销售的非安全状态,维持 Coinbase 的立场美国第二巡回上诉法院做出了有利于 Coinbase 的裁决,确认其平台上的加密货币二次销售不属于证券交易。这一具有里程碑意义的决定澄清了加密货币交易所的监管环境,并为市场参与者提供了一定程度的确定性,塑造了数字资产行业的未来。

Coinbase 的胜利:加密货币二级销售摆脱了证券的束缚

Landmark Victory for Coinbase: Court Rules Crypto Secondary Sales Exempt from Securities Laws

Coinbase 的里程碑式胜利:法院裁定加密货币二级销售不受证券法约束

In a pivotal victory for the cryptocurrency industry, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled in favor of leading exchange Coinbase, holding that secondary sales of crypto assets do not constitute securities transactions. This groundbreaking decision has profound implications for the regulation and operation of crypto exchanges, shaping the future landscape of the digital asset market.

美国第二巡回上诉法院做出了对领先交易所 Coinbase 有利的裁决,认为加密资产的二级销售不构成证券交易,这是加密货币行业的一次关键胜利。这一开创性的决定对加密货币交易所的监管和运营产生深远影响,塑造数字资产市场的未来格局。

Coinbase Lawsuit: A Defining Moment

Coinbase 诉讼:决定性时刻

The lawsuit, initiated by plaintiffs Louis Oberlander, Christopher Underwood, and Henry Rodriguez, alleged that Coinbase violated federal and state securities laws in its trading of specific cryptocurrencies. The plaintiffs argued that cryptocurrencies traded on Coinbase's platform met the definition of securities under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

该诉讼由原告 Louis Oberlander、Christopher Underwood 和 Henry Rodriguez 发起,指控 Coinbase 在特定加密货币交易中违反了联邦和州证券法。原告辩称,在 Coinbase 平台上交易的加密货币符合 1933 年《证券法》和 1934 年《证券交易法》对证券的定义。

Court's Ruling: Comprehensive and Crystallizing

法院判决:全面且具体

The Court of Appeals' ruling addressed each argument methodically. While it acknowledged Coinbase's potential liability under the Securities Act for the sale of unregistered securities, it dismissed claims under the Securities Exchange Act due to insufficient evidence. Crucially, the court affirmed that secondary sales of crypto assets on Coinbase's platform did not qualify as securities transactions, marking a resounding victory for the exchange.

上诉法院的裁决系统地处理了每个论点。虽然它承认 Coinbase 根据《证券法》对销售未注册证券负有潜在责任,但由于证据不足,驳回了根据《证券交易法》提出的索赔。至关重要的是,法院确认 Coinbase 平台上的加密资产二次销售不符合证券交易的资格,这标志着该交易所取得了巨大的胜利。

Industry Implications: Clarity and Confidence

行业影响:清晰度和信心

The court's decision carries immense implications for the broader cryptocurrency industry, injecting clarity into the regulatory landscape and bolstering market operations. By drawing a clear distinction between secondary crypto sales and securities transactions, the ruling provides a much-needed degree of certainty for crypto exchanges and market participants alike. It underscores the significance of watertight contractual agreements in determining legal obligations and liabilities within the digital asset space.

法院的裁决对更广泛的加密货币行业产生了巨大影响,为监管环境注入了清晰度并支持了市场运营。通过明确区分二级加密货币销售和证券交易,该裁决为加密货币交易所和市场参与者提供了急需的确定性。它强调了无懈可击的合同协议在确定数字资产领域的法律义务和责任方面的重要性。

Plaintiffs vs. Defendants: Divergent Perspectives

原告与被告:不同的观点

The plaintiffs view the ruling as a step forward in holding cryptocurrency platforms accountable under securities laws and advocating for investor protection. They perceive the decision as a validation of their efforts to ensure regulatory compliance and safeguard market integrity in the dynamic crypto ecosystem. In contrast, Coinbase maintains that the ruling vindicates its position that secondary crypto sales fall outside the purview of securities regulations, emphasizing the importance of contractual clarity and regulatory certainty for industry innovation.

原告认为,这一裁决是在让加密货币平台承担证券法责任和倡导投资者保护方面向前迈出的一步。他们认为这一决定是对他们在动态加密生态系统中确保监管合规性和维护市场完整性所做努力的验证。相比之下,Coinbase 坚称,该裁决证明了其立场,即二级加密货币销售不属于证券监管范围,并强调了合同清晰度和监管确定性对行业创新的重要性。

Regulatory Landscape and Innovation: Evolving Dynamics

监管格局与创新:不断发展的动态

As the crypto industry continues its rapid evolution, regulatory clarity and legal precedents play a pivotal role in shaping market dynamics and fostering innovation. The Court of Appeals' decision provides valuable insights into the legal treatment of cryptocurrencies and digital assets, paving the way for greater regulatory certainty and market stability. Moving forward, industry stakeholders must navigate the evolving regulatory landscape while embracing opportunities for innovation and growth in the burgeoning digital asset ecosystem.

随着加密货币行业持续快速发展,监管清晰度和法律先例在塑造市场动态和促进创新方面发挥着关键作用。上诉法院的裁决为加密货币和数字资产的法律处理提供了宝贵的见解,为提高监管确定性和市场稳定性铺平了道路。展望未来,行业利益相关者必须应对不断变化的监管环境,同时拥抱蓬勃发展的数字资产生态系统中的创新和增长机会。

Conclusion: A Watershed Moment in Crypto Legal History

结论:加密货币法律史上的分水岭

The US Court of Appeals' ruling in favor of Coinbase stands as a watershed moment in the legal history of the cryptocurrency industry. By affirming that secondary sales of crypto are not securities, the court provides clarity and guidance for market participants, regulators, and investors alike. As the crypto ecosystem continues to mature, legal precedents and regulatory frameworks will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping its future trajectory and fostering sustainable growth and innovation.

美国上诉法院支持 Coinbase 的裁决是加密货币行业法律史上的一个分水岭。通过确认加密货币的二次销售不是证券,法院为市场参与者、监管机构和投资者等提供了明确性和指导。随着加密货币生态系统的不断成熟,法律先例和监管框架无疑将在塑造其未来发展轨迹、促进可持续增长和创新方面发挥关键作用。

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2024年11月21日 发表的其他文章