Tron 基金會反抗 SEC，為加密貨幣攤牌奠定基礎

在 Tron 基金會與 SEC 之間的法律訴訟中，Tron 質疑 SEC 對外國數位資產發行的權威，並聲稱缺乏支持欺詐指控的實質證據。這項結果對 Tron 及其平台有影響，並可能塑造加密貨幣產業的監管格局。

Tron Foundation Defies SEC's Allegations, Sparking Legal Showdown

Tron 基金會無視 SEC 的指控，引發法律攤牌

In a momentous legal battle resembling the biblical clash between David and Goliath, the Tron Foundation has boldly challenged the allegations brought against it by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The outcome of this legal showdown has profound implications not only for Tron and its affiliated platforms but also for the burgeoning cryptocurrency industry as a whole.

在一場類似《聖經》中大衛與歌利亞衝突的重大法律戰中，波場基金會大膽質疑美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 對其提出的指控。這場法律對決的結果不僅對 Tron 及其附屬平台，而且對整個新興的加密貨幣行業都具有深遠的影響。

Core of the Dispute

爭議的核心

The crux of the dispute stems from the SEC's accusations that Tron and BitTorrent engaged in unregistered securities offerings through their TRX and BTT tokens. However, Tron has vehemently contested the SEC's jurisdiction over these offerings, which it maintains were made to foreign buyers on global platforms outside the United States.

爭議的癥結源於 SEC 指控 Tron 和 BitTorrent 透過其 TRX 和 BTT 代幣從事未經註冊的證券發行。然而，Tron 強烈質疑 SEC 對這些產品的管轄權，它堅稱這些產品是在美國以外的全球平台上向外國買家提供的。

Tron's Defense

特隆的防禦

In a motion filed in a New York federal court on March 28th, Tron's legal representatives asserted that the SEC's attempt to apply U.S. securities laws to these foreign offerings constitutes an excessive overreach. They argue that Tron's tokens were purposefully sold outside the U.S. to avoid the American market, a fact that the SEC has failed to disprove.

在 3 月 28 日向紐約聯邦法院提交的動議中，Tron 的法律代表聲稱 SEC 試圖將美國證券法適用於這些外國發行，這構成了過度的越權。他們認為，Tron 的代幣是故意在美國境外出售的，以避免進入美國市場，但 SEC 未能反駁這一事實。

One of the most striking aspects of Tron's defense is the conspicuous lack of concrete evidence presented by the SEC to substantiate its claims. Despite alleging fraud, the Commission has not provided a single victim or victim statement, casting doubt on the validity of its accusations. Furthermore, Tron has raised concerns about the SEC's vague delineation of the role of each defendant and its reliance on speculation rather than hard facts.

Tron 辯護中最引人注目的方面之一是 SEC 明顯缺乏具體證據來證實其主張。儘管指控有欺詐行為，但委員會並未提供任何受害者或受害者陳述，令人對其指控的有效性產生懷疑。此外，波場也對美國證券交易委員會對每個被告角色的模糊描述以及其依賴猜測而非確鑿事實表示擔憂。

Jurisdictional Challenge

管轄權挑戰

Tron's defense rests heavily on challenging the SEC's jurisdictional authority over foreign digital asset offerings on global platforms. The Foundation has filed a motion to dismiss the SEC's allegations, arguing that the Commission's reach does not extend to transactions conducted outside the United States. By emphasizing that Tron's tokens were specifically sold to foreign buyers to avoid the American market, the Foundation asserts that the SEC has failed to provide evidence to the contrary.

Tron 的辯護很大程度上取決於挑戰 SEC 對全球平台上的外國數位資產產品的管轄權。該基金會已提出一項動議，駁回美國證券交易委員會的指控，認為該委員會的管轄範圍不適用於在美國境外進行的交易。該基金會強調 Tron 的代幣是專門出售給外國買家以避免美國市場的，因此聲稱 SEC 未能提供相反的證據。

Lack of Evidence

缺乏證據

At the heart of Tron's defense is the absence of concrete evidence presented by the SEC to support its claims. Despite alleging fraud, the Commission has not produced any statements from purported victims. Tron contends that the SEC's case relies heavily on speculation and lacks clarity regarding the specific roles of each defendant.

Tron 辯護的核心是 SEC 沒有提供具體證據來支持其主張。儘管指控存在欺詐行為，但委員會尚未提供所謂受害者的任何聲明。 Tron 認為，SEC 的案件很大程度上依賴猜測，並且對每個被告的特定角色缺乏明確性。

Wider Implications

更廣泛的影響

This legal battle extends far beyond the Tron Foundation, with significant implications for the broader cryptocurrency community. Major cryptocurrency exchanges, including Kraken and Coinbase, are closely monitoring the proceedings, recognizing the potential impact on regulatory frameworks governing digital assets.

這場法律戰遠遠超出了波場基金會的範圍，對更廣泛的加密貨幣社群產生了重大影響。 Kraken 和 Coinbase 等主要加密貨幣交易所正在密切關注這一進程，並認識到這對數位資產監管框架的潛在影響。

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching ramifications for the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem. As leading cryptocurrency exchanges have echoed in their own legal defenses, the resolution of this case could serve as a pivotal moment in shaping the regulatory landscape of the cryptocurrency world.

此案的結果可能會對整個加密貨幣生態系統產生深遠的影響。由於領先的加密貨幣交易所在自己的法律辯護中做出了回應，此案的解決可能成為塑造加密貨幣世界監管格局的關鍵時刻。

Global Debate

全球辯論

By steadfastly challenging the SEC's authority, the Tron Foundation is thrusting a global debate onto the judicial stage, with the potential to chart a new course for the future of cryptocurrencies. Whether Tron emerges victorious or not, the reverberations of this legal battle are bound to be felt throughout the crypto community, underscoring the delicate balance between innovation and regulation in this rapidly evolving space.

透過堅定地挑戰 SEC 的權威，Tron 基金會將全球辯論推上了司法舞台，並有可能為加密貨幣的未來制定新的路線。無論 Tron 是否獲勝，這場法律戰的影響必然會波及整個加密貨幣社區，凸顯出這個快速發展的領域中創新與監管之間的微妙平衡。

Litmus Test

石蕊測試

In a world where the line between digital innovation and regulatory compliance is increasingly blurred, the outcome of this case will serve as a litmus test for the broader acceptance and legitimacy of cryptocurrencies. As investors and enthusiasts alike hold their breath, all eyes remain glued to the courtroom proceedings, awaiting the final verdict that could reshape the very foundations of the cryptocurrency landscape.

在數位創新與監管合規之間的界線日益模糊的世界中，此案的結果將成為加密貨幣更廣泛接受度和合法性的試金石。當投資者和愛好者都屏住呼吸時，所有的目光都集中在法庭訴訟上，等待最終的裁決，這可能會重塑加密貨幣格局的基礎。