Solana Memecoin 交易在 2024 年創建和交易的 Memecoin 產生了創紀錄的 30 億美元費用

今年，加密貨幣領域 memecoin 的發行量增加，其中 Solana 的數量龐大。

Solana memecoin traders generated a record $3 billion in fees from memecoins created and traded on it in 2024, according to data from Coingecko.

根據 Coingecko 的數據，2024 年，Solana memecoin 交易者透過在其上創建和交易的 memecoin 產生了創紀錄的 30 億美元費用。

The year saw a rise in the release of memecoins in the crypto space with Solana having a huge number. According to Coingecko, Solana memecoins got the fourth position on the trend report for 2024. Other categories that followed were Base memecoins, and AI memecoins.

今年，加密貨幣領域的 memecoin 發行量增加，其中 Solana 的數量龐大。根據 Coingecko 的數據，Solana memecoins 在 2024 年趨勢報告中排名第四。

A breakdown of the $3 billion fee on Solana showed that the flow was across platforms that support the memecoin ecosystem such as DEXes, Trading BOTs, and MEV infrastructures.

Solana 上 30 億美元費用的細分顯示，資金流跨支援 memecoin 生態系統的平台，例如 DEX、交易 BOT 和 MEV 基礎設施。

According to the report, the top 1% of users were responsible for generating a significant portion of the platform’s total fees, contributing $1.358 billion, which accounts for 79.88% of the total fees of $1.7 billion. These top users paid, on average, $34,700 in fees.

報告顯示，前 1% 的用戶貢獻了平台總費用的很大一部分，貢獻了 13.58 億美元，佔總費用 17 億美元的 79.88%。這些頂級用戶平均支付 34,700 美元的費用。

In contrast, users ranked 2-20% (those who are not in the top 1%, but still relatively active) had a much lower average fee of less than $800. Lastly, long-tail users ranked below 20%—a much larger group—contributed even less, with an average fee of less than $100.

相比之下，排名 2-20% 的用戶（不在前 1%，但仍然相對活躍的用戶）的平均費用要低得多，不到 800 美元。最後，排名低於 20% 的長尾用戶（一個更大的群體）的貢獻甚至更少，平均費用不到 100 美元。

Looking at the spending habits of traders, the report showed that the largest expenses by a Whale in 2024 on Solana memecoins was $129 million on fees. This fee went to Raydium, a DEX built on Solana for trading different Solana-based tokens.

從交易者的消費習慣來看，報告顯示，2024 年鯨魚在 Solana memecoin 上的最大支出為 1.29 億美元的費用。這筆費用流向了 Raydium，這是一個基於 Solana 構建的 DEX，用於交易不同的基於 Solana 的代幣。

The fee expenditures on other platforms, like trading bots, Jito, and Pump.fun, are described as “modest” in comparison to Raydium. For example, the fee expenditure for trading bots is $1.43 million, which is relatively modest compared to Raydium’s higher fees.

與 Raydium 相比，交易機器人、Jito 和 Pump.fun 等其他平台的費用支出被描述為「適度」。例如，交易機器人的費用支出為 143 萬美元，與 Raydium 較高的費用相比相對適中。

Similarly, Jito, a platform that enhances Solana’s transaction processing, has a fee expenditure of $6.1399 million, which, though higher than trading bots, is still considered small relative to Raydium’s dominance in the space Pump.fun, a platform associated with speculative, social-driven trades, has a fee expenditure of $2.3992 million, still much lower than Raydium.

同樣，增強 Solana 交易處理的平台 Jito 的費用支出為 613.99 萬美元，雖然高於交易機器人，但相對於 Raydium 在投機、社交相關平台 Pump.fun 領域的主導地位而言，仍然被認為很小。的交易，費用支出為239.92萬美元，仍遠低於Raydium。

Raydium was primarily favored by whale traders due to its high liquidity pools, which allow them to execute large orders without significantly impacting the price of the assets. Both whales and regular users also rely heavily on trading bots.

Raydium 主要因其高流動性池而受到鯨魚交易者的青睞，這使他們能夠在不顯著影響資產價格的情況下執行大筆訂單。鯨魚和一般用戶也嚴重依賴交易機器人。

For whales, trading bots were used to streamline and optimize complex strategies, such as arbitrage or market making, across multiple platforms. Regular users also utilize trading bots but typically for simpler strategies, such as following trends or making periodic trades.

對於鯨魚來說，交易機器人被用來簡化和優化複雜的策略，例如跨多個平台的套利或做市。普通用戶也使用交易機器人，但通常用於更簡單的策略，例如追蹤趨勢或進行定期交易。

Novice traders, on the other hand, were typically drawn to platforms like Pump.fun, which revolve around speculative, hype-driven trading events. Additionally, the simplicity and social nature of platforms like Pump.fun make them appealing to beginners who are eager to engage in the cryptocurrency market, even if the risk of losses is high.

另一方面，新手交易者通常會被 Pump.fun 等平台所吸引，這些平台圍繞著投機、炒作驅動的交易事件。此外，Pump.fun 等平台的簡單性和社交性質使其對渴望參與加密貨幣市場的初學者有吸引力，即使損失的風險很高。

More than half of people who use trading bots only use one platform. Users who use bots have an average trading volume of $93,500, while those who don’t use bots trade more, with an average volume of $678,800. Whale users, who trade in large amounts, prefer the Photon bot platform, while regular users tend to choose Trojan. Novice users, who are still learning, use a mix of platforms, with Trojan, Photon, PepeBoost, and Bullx being the most common ones.

超過一半使用交易機器人的人只使用一個平台。使用機器人的用戶平均交易量為 93,500 美元，而不使用機器人的用戶交易量更多，平均交易量為 678,800 美元。交易量較大的鯨魚用戶喜歡 Photon bot 平台，而一般用戶則傾向選擇 Trojan。仍在學習的新手用戶使用多種平台，其中 Trojan、Photon、PepeBoost 和 Bullx 是最常見的平台。