重生：4年前耗資700億美元的CRO被燒毀了

該事件是由Cronos Chain在3月初根據Crypto.com提出的提案引起的。該提議是重新磨合700億個CRO（相當於CRO令牌當前循環的3.3333倍）。

Crypto behemoth Crypto.com faced backlash for its proposal to re-mint 70 billion CRO tokens, an act that would effectively negate the 2021 burn event. The proposal, discussed at length on Cronos chain, drew criticism from both community members and prominent KOLs.

Crypto Behemoth Crypto.com因其對重新染上700億CRO令牌的提議而面臨反彈，該法案將有效地否定了2021年的燒傷活動。該提案詳細討論了Cronos連鎖店，引起了社區成員和著名KOL的批評。

Despite the widespread dissent and doubts, Crypto.com remained firm in its stance. In several AMAs and media interviews, executives from Crypto.com repeatedly stated “trust us or sell.”

儘管存在普遍的異議和懷疑，但Crypto.com仍然處於堅定狀態。在幾次AMA和媒體採訪中，來自Crypto.com的高管反复說“信任我們或出售”。

The “No” votes against the proposal far outweighed the "Yes" votes in the first few days of the vote and were far from reaching the quorum (the threshold for voting to take effect). However, just before the end of the vote (14:00 UTC on March 16), 3.35 billion CRO were suddenly poured into the voting pool, all voting in favor.

反對該提案的“否”投票遠遠超過了投票的頭幾天的“是”投票，而遠未達到法定人數（投票的閾值生效的門檻）。但是，就在投票結束之前（3月16日UTC 14:00），突然將33.5億個CRO倒入投票池中，全部投票支持。

These tokens are said to belong to the nodes controlled by Crypto.com, and these nodes control nearly 70%-80% of the voting rights.

據說這些令牌屬於Crypto.com控制的節點，這些節點控制了近70％-80％的投票權。

After the so-called “decentralized” vote was passed, the CRO community was thrown into chaos, and Kris from Crypto.com became the target of public criticism.

通過所謂的“分散”投票後，CRO社區被陷入混亂，而Crypto.com的Kris成為公眾批評的目標。

But for the OGs in the cryptocurrency circle, the CRO operation is not reasonable, but at least it is expected. Looking back at the history of Crypto.com’s rise and development, it is not difficult to find that this is not the first community rebellion (and it is estimated that it will not be the last).

但是對於加密貨幣圓中的OGS，CRO操作是不合理的，但至少可以預期。回顧Crypto.com的興起和發展的歷史，並不難發現這不是第一次社區叛亂（據估計，這將不是最後一個）。

CRO’s predecessor is MONACO ($MCO), an old project that launched its ICO in 2017 and is a payment gateway that uses crypto cards as its entry point. It became very popular as soon as it was listed in 2017/2018, and almost all major exchanges rushed to list it, including Binance, Okex, Coinbase, Bithumb, Upbit, etc.

CRO的前身是摩納哥（$ MCO），這是一個舊項目，該項目於2017年推出了ICO，是使用加密卡作為入口點的支付網關。它在2017/2018年列出後就變得非常受歡迎，幾乎所有的主要交易所都急於列出它，包括Binance，Okex，Coinbase，Coinbase，Bithumb，Upbit等。

In the second half of 2018, they announced a brand upgrade from Monaco to Crypto.com. At the end of 2018, they also issued a token called $CRO based on the Crypto.com ecosystem. It was very popular when it was first listed, and quickly appeared on major Chinese and Korean exchanges. Note that Crypto.com had not yet announced its entry into the exchange business.

在2018年下半年，他們宣布了從摩納哥到crypto.com的品牌升級。在2018年底，他們還根據Crypto.com生態系統發布了名為$ CRO的令牌。當它首次列出時，它非常受歡迎，並很快出現在中國和韓國少校的交流中。請注意，Crypto.com尚未宣布其進入交換業務。

One thing that impressed me most was that CRO was listed on two major Korean exchanges around October 2019. Less than a month later, Crypto.com announced its entry into the exchange. The person in charge of listing CRO at the time was so angry that he almost flipped the table - it was really a good move to sneak into Chencang.

我給我留下深刻印象的一件事是，CRO在2019年10月左右在兩次主要的朝鮮交流中列出。不到一個月後，Crypto.com宣布進入交易所。當時列出CRO的負責人非常生氣，以至於他幾乎翻了桌子 - 偷偷溜進智慧確實是一個很好的舉動。

Fast forward to August 2020, Crypto.com announced that the MCO token would be incorporated into the new $CRO system. I have forgotten the specific ratio, but Monaco holders only accounted for a fraction of the total CRO market, which also caused an uproar (the community was in an uproar).

快進到2020年8月，Crypto.com宣布將將MCO代幣納入新的$ CRO系統中。我忘記了特定比率，但是摩納哥持有者僅佔CRO總市場的一小部分，這也引起了軒然大波（社區正在騷動）。

Rumor has it that the purpose of this move may be to "backdoor" CRO to be listed on Binance. After all, CRO was in its heyday at the time (market value TOP20), and its daily average trading volume was among the best. Successfully listing CRO is equivalent to having an additional money printing machine, but who would have thought that Binance would not buy it at all. After the coin swap in 2021, MCO was delisted, and the listing of CRO also came to a halt.

有傳言說，此舉的目的可能是“後門” CRO列為二手股。畢竟，CRO當時正處於鼎盛時期（Top20市場價值），其日常平均交易量是最好的。成功列出CRO等同於擁有一台額外的金錢印刷機，但誰會認為Binance根本不會購買它。在2021年的硬幣互換之後，MCO被劃定了，CRO的上市也停了下來。

There was another episode. In February 2021, Crypto.com officially announced that in order to embrace decentralized governance and the establishment of Cronos chain, it decided to burn 70% of the tokens (you can imagine the number of tokens held by the project).

還有另一集。 2021年2月，Crypto.com正式宣布，為了接受分散的治理和建立Cronos鏈，它決定燃燒70％的代幣（您可以想像該項目持有的代幣數量）。

However, four years later, Crypto.com announced that it had decided to re-mint the tokens that were burned that year in order to support the ETF.

但是，四年後，Crypto.com宣布已決定重新塗上當年被燒毀的代幣，以支持ETF。

Finally, there is one more interesting thing. On March 16, the day after the proposal to re-mint 70 billion CRO was passed, the Cronos team proposed another proposal to burn 50 million $CRO. Is this to calm the anger of the community? Or is it a mockery? I don’t understand.

最後，還有一件有趣的事情。 3月16日，即通過重新染上700億克羅的提議後的第二天，克羅諾斯小組提出了另一項燃燒5000萬美元的提議。這是為了平息社區的憤怒嗎？還是嘲笑？我不明白。

If all burned tokens can be reborn, then what is the point of blockchain?

如果所有被燒毀的令牌都可以重生，那麼區塊鏈的意義是什麼？

Author link: https://x.com/agintender

作者鏈接：https：//x.com/agintender