PI網絡令牌價格下跌20％，因為Bybit首席執行官Ben Zhou將其標記為“比Memecoins更危險”

3月9日晚上，PI網絡項目的PI令牌的價格急劇下降，每令牌下跌至1.23美元，然後反彈至1.50美元左右

The evening of March 9 saw the Pi token from the Pi Network project experience a sharp price drop, falling to $1.23 per token before rebounding to around $1.50 by the morning of March 10.

3月9日晚上，PI網絡項目的PI令牌經歷了巨大的價格下跌，到3月10日上午的反彈至1.50美元左右，跌至1.23美元。

This unexpected decline came amid rising tensions between Pi Network supporters and Bybit, a top global cryptocurrency exchange.

在PI網絡支持者和BYBIT之間的緊張局勢加劇，這是全球最高的加密貨幣交易所之間的緊張局勢。

Bybit’s CEO, Ben Zhou, had been making headlines with his criticism of Pi Network, which he described as being "more dangerous than memecoins". According to him, Pi Network targets users with little knowledge of cryptocurrency, setting up tokens with great price potential in order to generate hype.

拜比特（Bybit）的首席執行官本·週（Ben Zhou）一直以他對PI Network的批評成為頭條新聞，他形容這是“比Memecoins更危險的”。據他介紹，PI網絡對用戶的目標很少了解加密貨幣，設置具有巨大價格潛力的令牌以產生炒作。

He also pointed out that despite Pi being listed on multiple crypto exchanges, the team behind Pi Network remains largely anonymous.

他還指出，儘管PI在多個加密交易所上列出，但PI Network背後的團隊仍在很大程度上是匿名的。

"They mention someone from Stanford, but you've never actually seen them or heard them publicly discuss the project," Ben Zhou remarked.

本周說：“他們提到了斯坦福大學的某人，但您從未真正見過他們或公開討論該項目。”

He further suggested that the founders of Pi Network should appear publicly, perhaps through a livestream, to provide more clarity on the project’s legitimacy.

他進一步建議，PI網絡的創始人應該通過直播公開出現，以更加清楚該項目的合法性。

Following these statements, Pi Network’s community launched a coordinated attack on Bybit’s app on Google Play Store, flooding it with one-star reviews and negative comments. Many Pi Pi Network supporters accused Bybit of being biased against Pi and questioned its security.

在這些聲明之後，PI Network的社區在Google Play商店上發起了對Bybit應用程序的協調攻擊，並以一星級的評論和負面評論淹沒了它。許多PI PI網絡支持者指責Bybit對PI有偏見，並質疑其安全性。

Among the negative reviews, some users wrote:

在負面評論中，一些用戶寫道：

“Bybit has poor security, hackers can easily attack it.”

“ Bybit的安全性差，黑客很容易攻擊它。”

“The exchange is done for, criticizing Pai Network will bring bad karma.”

“交流是為了完成的，批評PAI網絡將帶來壞業力。”

“Bybit is a scam and disrespects Pi Network.”

“ Bybit是一個騙局，不尊重PI網絡。”

“What proof does Bybit have to call Pi a scam?”

“拜特比特必須將PI稱為騙局什麼證明？”

As a result of this backlash, Bybit’s Google Play Store rating dropped from nearly five stars to 2.7 stars within hours.

由於這種反彈，拜比特的Google Play商店等級在幾個小時內從近五顆星下降到2.7顆星。

Despite the surge of criticism, Bybit remained composed in its responses, stating: "Thank you for your feedback. Bybit carefully evaluates all tokens before listing. Our team conducts thorough reviews to ensure a safe trading environment for our users. Please check our official listing announcements for updates."

儘管受到批評的激增，但Bybit仍在其回應中構成：“謝謝您的反饋。Bybit在列出之前仔細評估所有令牌。我們的團隊進行詳盡的審查，以確保為我們的用戶提供安全的交易環境。請檢查我們的官方列表公告以獲取更新。”

This is not the first time Pi Network’s supporters have aggressively targeted critics or crypto exchanges.

這不是PI Network的支持者首次具有積極針對的批評者或加密交流。

When Vietnam Blockchain Alliance Chairman Dang Minh Tuan published an analysis questioning Pi Network’s transparency on Facebook, he was attacked with personal insults from Pi Network supporters, prompting him to issue a public warning.

當越南區塊鏈聯盟主席Dang Minh Tuan在Facebook上發表了一項質疑PI Network的透明度的分析時，他受到PI Network支持者的個人侮辱而受到攻擊，促使他發出公開警告。

Additionally, Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, was also bombarded with one-star reviews after its community vote on listing Pi ended with the exchange choosing not to list the token.

此外，Binance是世界上最大的加密貨幣交易所之一，在社區對列出PI的投票之後，Binance也受到了一星級評論的轟炸，而PI結束時，交易所選擇不列出代幣。