Ozone Chain和Cellframe：哪種抗量子區塊鏈比較好？

在當今的區塊鏈網路中，必須改進傳統的密碼方法，以防禦能夠快速解決問題的量子計算機

In the realm of blockchain technology, the threat posed by quantum computers to traditional cryptographic methods is a pressing concern. To preempt this vulnerability, quantum-resistant blockchain technology is being developed to safeguard distributed ledger systems.

在區塊鏈技術領域，量子電腦對傳統密碼方法的威脅是一個迫切的問題。為了預防這個漏洞，正在開發抗量子區塊鏈技術來保護分散式帳本系統。

This emerging class of blockchains aims to protect sensitive transaction details from being compromised by malicious actors utilizing quantum computers. Here, we present an overview of two leading quantum-proof blockchain platforms, each boasting unique strengths in this competitive landscape. Their ability to withstand quantum attacks while maintaining high throughput and scalability will play a crucial role in the future of distributed ledgers.

這種新興的區塊鏈旨在保護敏感的交易細節免遭惡意行為者利用量子電腦的損害。在這裡，我們概述了兩個領先的量子證明區塊鏈平台，每個平台在這個競爭格局中都有獨特的優勢。它們抵禦量子攻擊同時保持高吞吐量和可擴展性的能力將在分散式帳本的未來中發揮至關重要的作用。

Introducing Ozone Chain (OZO) and Cellframe

臭氧鏈 (OZO) 和 Cellframe 簡介

In the arena of quantum-resistant blockchains, Ozone Chain and Cellframe stand out with their distinct approaches to security, scalability, and ecosystem development.

在抗量子區塊鏈領域，Ozone Chain 和 Cellframe 以其獨特的安全性、可擴展性和生態系統開發方法脫穎而出。

Security: Ozone Chain employs advanced post-quantum cryptography and quantum random number generation to safeguard data against quantum computing threats. In contrast, Cellframe utilizes quantum-resistant algorithms to secure data transmission and storage.

安全性：Ozone Chain採用先進的後量子密碼學和量子隨機數產生技術來保護資料免受量子運算威脅。相較之下，Cellframe 利用抗量子演算法來保護資料傳輸和儲存。

Ozone Chain's独自のconsensual mechanism contributes to high transaction throughput and scalability, while maintaining strong security as performance increases. On the other hand, Cell

Ozone Chain的獨自の共識機制有助於實現高交易吞吐量和可擴展性，同時隨著效能的提高保持強大的安全性。另一方面，細胞