黑山最高法院撤銷 Do Kwon 的引渡到美國

由於程序錯誤，黑山最高法院推翻了下級法院引渡 Terraform Labs 聯合創始人 Do Kwon 的決定。這使得權可以留在黑山，同時面臨國際刑事指控。法院強調需要對多個國家的引渡申請進行徹底審查，目前高等法院對權引渡做出最終決定。

Montenegrin Supreme Court Upholds Do Kwon's Appeal, Reversing Extradition Order

黑山最高法院維持道權的上訴，撤銷引渡令

Podgorica, Montenegro - In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of Montenegro has overturned a lower court ruling that approved the extradition of Do Kwon, the co-founder of Terraform Labs. The Supreme Court's ruling has sent shockwaves through the international legal community, raising questions about the complexities of extradition proceedings involving competing requests from multiple jurisdictions.

黑山波德戈里察 - 黑山最高法院做出了一項具有里程碑意義的決定，推翻了下級法院批准引渡 Terraform Labs 聯合創始人 Do Kwon 的裁決。最高法院的裁決在國際法律界引起了震動，引發了人們對涉及多個司法管轄區相互競爭的請求的引渡程序的複雜性提出了質疑。

Procedural Errors and Competing Extradition Petitions

程序錯誤和相互競爭的引渡申請

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court highlighted procedural errors committed by the lower court in handling Kwon's extradition case. Specifically, the court criticized the lower court's failure to properly consider competing extradition petitions from the United States and South Korea.

最高法院在一項一致決定中強調了下級法院在處理權引渡案時犯下的程序錯誤。具體來說，法院批評下級法院未能適當考慮來自美國和韓國的相互競爭的引渡請求。

Supreme Court's Intervention

最高法院的干預

The decision to overturn the extradition order came after prosecutors appealed a previous appellate court ruling that denied Kwon's defense team's appeal. In its April 5th decision, the Supreme Court emphasized the need for the High Court in Podgorica to individually review each extradition case.

推翻引渡令的決定是在檢察官對上訴法院先前駁回權律師團隊上訴的裁決提出上訴後作出的。最高法院在 4 月 5 日的裁決中強調，波德戈里察高等法院需要單獨審查每個引渡案件。

Extradition Procedures and Ministerial Discretion

引渡程序和部長裁量權

The Supreme Court's ruling clarifies that extradition orders are not finalized by the courts but by a competent ministry. In this case, the decision of whether to extradite Kwon to the United States or South Korea now rests with the High Court.

最高法院的裁決澄清，引渡令不是由法院而是由主管機關最終確定。在這種情況下，是否將權引渡到美國或韓國現在由高等法院決定。

International Legal Scrutiny

國際法律審查

Kwon was arrested in March 2023 for using falsified travel papers, sparking intense international legal scrutiny. His arrest has also been cited by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in its ongoing lawsuit against Terraform Labs and Kwon.

權於 2023 年 3 月因使用偽造旅行證件被捕，引發了國際法律的嚴厲審查。美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 在針對 Terraform Labs 和 Kwon 正在進行的訴訟中也提到了他的逮捕。

Freedom of Movement and Ongoing Accusations

行動自由和持續的指控

Despite the ongoing criminal accusations against him in both the U.S. and South Korea, Do Kwon is now free to travel within Montenegro pending the High Court's decision on his extradition. This decision underscores the complexities of international extradition, particularly when multiple jurisdictions are involved.

儘管美國和韓國持續對他提出刑事指控，但 Do Kwon 現在可以在黑山境內自由旅行，等待高等法院對其引渡的決定。這項決定強調了國際引渡的複雜性，特別是在涉及多個司法管轄區時。

Legal Framework and International Cooperation

法律框架與國際合作

The Supreme Court's decision highlights the intricate legal framework governing international extradition proceedings. It emphasizes the importance of due process, individual review, and the challenges of balancing the interests of multiple jurisdictions.

最高法院的裁決凸顯了管理國際引渡程序的複雜法律架構。它強調正當程序、個人審查的重要性以及平衡多個司法管轄區利益的挑戰。

Impact on Terraform Labs Prosecution

對 Terraform Labs 起訴的影響

The ongoing legal battles against Terraform Labs and its executives, including Do Kwon, underscore the complex legal landscape surrounding international financial crimes. The Supreme Court's decision marks a pivotal development in the legal proceedings against Kwon and raises questions about the future of the Terraform Labs case.

針對 Terraform Labs 及其高管（包括 Do Kwon）正在進行的法律鬥爭凸顯了圍繞國際金融犯罪的複雜法律環境。最高法院的裁決標誌著針對 Kwon 的法律訴訟取得了關鍵進展，並對 Terraform Labs 案件的未來提出了疑問。

Conclusion

結論

The Supreme Court of Montenegro's decision to overturn Do Kwon's extradition order has far-reaching implications for international extradition procedures. It emphasizes the need for careful consideration of competing jurisdictions, due process, and the role of national ministries in finalizing extradition requests. The outcome of this case will closely be scrutinized by the global legal community and will shape the future of international extradition proceedings involving high-profile individuals and complex financial crimes.

黑山最高法院推翻道權引渡令的決定對國際引渡程序有深遠影響。它強調需要仔細考慮相互競爭的司法管轄區、正當程序以及國家部會在最終確定引渡請求時的作用。此案的結果將受到全球法律界的密切關注，並將影響涉及知名人士和複雜金融犯罪的國際引渡程序的未來。