邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor）與傑森·洛里（Jason Lowery

在最近的比特幣政策學院活動演講中，邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor）與傑森·洛里（Jason Lowery）少校的“軟件”論文緊密合作，將比特幣作為關鍵的防禦機制

In a recent speech at a Bitcoin Policy Institute event, Michael Saylor closely aligned his remarks with Major Jason Lowery’s ‘SoftWar’ thesis, presenting Bitcoin as a crucial national defense mechanism.

在比特幣政策學院活動的最近演講中，邁克爾·賽勒（Michael Saylor）與傑森·洛里少校（Jason Lowery）的“軟件”論文的言論緊密相結合，將比特幣視為至關重要的國防機制。

During his talk, Saylor highlighted Bitcoin’s role as a “digital defense system,” drawing parallels between the cryptocurrency’s open, decentralized energy flow and the strategic military defense of cyberspace.

在演講中，塞勒（Saylor）強調了比特幣作為“數字防禦系統”的角色，在加密貨幣開放的，分散的能源流與網絡空間的戰略軍事防御之間相似。

Echoing Lowery’s SoftWar theory, Saylor asserted that control over Bitcoin is pivotal for national security, setting the stage for a discussion of the cryptocurrency’s defense capabilities against sophisticated threats, including artificial intelligence systems.

Saylor回應了Lowery的軟件理論，他斷言對比特幣的控制對於國家安全至關重要，為討論加密貨幣的防禦能力奠定了基礎，以解決包括人工智能係統在內的複雜威脅。

“We have 800 exahashes of encryption, which no human institution, no state actor, and probably not even Elon Musk’s AI could hack in the next 1,000 years,” said Saylor, referencing comments made previously by the billionaire on the difficulty for AI to hack Bitcoin, and startup AuthLN already building such technology using the Lightning Network to make brute force hacking monetarily inefficient for bad actors.

Saylor說：“我們有800個Exahashes加密，沒有人類的機構，也沒有州行為者，甚至可能沒有Elon Musk的AI在未來1000年內可能會破存。”

He positioned this immense hashing power as an unprecedented shield safeguarding economic value and national security.

他將這種巨大的哈希力量定位為前所未有的盾牌保護經濟價值和國家安全。

“If you lose Bitcoin, you lose the metaverse, Web3, and the future of the internet. You lose dominance of cyberspace,” added Saylor, aligning closely with Lowery’s strategic framing of hashing power as the new frontier in global competition.

“如果您失去了比特幣，您將失去互聯網的Metaverse，Web3和未來。 Saylor補充說，您失去了網絡空間的統治地位。

Saylor went on to assert that losing control over Bitcoin would be tantamount to losing the economic lifeline of a nation, emphasizing the potential consequences of failing to maintain this critical domain.

塞勒繼續斷言，失去對比特幣的控制將與失去一個國家的經濟生命線有關，強調未能維持這個關鍵領域的潛在後果。

He noted that such a failure could risk severe economic disruption comparable to being cut off from critical sea routes, referencing historical precedents in warfare and economic competition, where control over key waterways and trade routes was paramount.

他指出，這樣的失敗可能會冒著與從關鍵的海上路線切斷的嚴重經濟中斷的風險，這是戰爭和經濟競爭中的歷史先例，在這種競爭中，對關鍵水道和貿易路線的控制至關重要。

The executive also called for immediate and significant national investment in the cryptocurrency, highlighting Strategy’s own substantial financial commitments.

高管還呼籲對加密貨幣進行立即和重大的全國性投資，強調戰略自己的實質性財務承諾。

He stated that the firm has invested $33 billion, roughly 2.4% of Bitcoin’s network, which he argued is a testament to the cryptocurrency’s strategic economic significance, implying a trillion-dollar valuation underpins the network’s security.

他說，該公司已經投資了330億美元，約佔比特幣網絡的2.4％，他認為這證明了加密貨幣的戰略經濟意義，這意味著該網絡的安全性是該網絡安全的基礎。

This level of investment from a single firm underscores the cryptocurrency’s role in shaping national and global economic strategy.

一家公司的這種投資水平強調了加密貨幣在塑造國家和全球經濟戰略中的作用。

The urgency in his speech mirrors Lowery’s argument that nations must aggressively participate in Bitcoin’s hashing competition to secure strategic advantages without resorting to violence, further reinforcing Bitcoin’s role as a cornerstone of modern geopolitical strategy.

他的演講中的緊迫性反映了洛里的論點，即國家必須積極參與比特幣的哈希競賽，以確保戰略優勢而不訴諸暴力，進一步加強了比特幣作為現代地緣政治戰略的基石的作用。

Finally, Saylor concluded that Bitcoin represents “manifest destiny” for America, tying his remarks on national interest closely to the historical concept of U.S. expansion and economic dominance.

最後，塞勒得出結論，比特幣代表著美國的“表現命運”，將他對國家利益的言論緊密地與美國擴張和經濟主導地位的歷史概念緊密聯繫在一起。

He framed the choice starkly as either “prosperity or poverty” based on whether nations effectively leverage Bitcoin’s strategic value in the unfolding technological landscape.

他根據國家是否有效利用比特幣在不斷發展的技術格局中利用比特幣的戰略價值而將選擇鮮為人知。