引入區塊鏈項目景觀中最被低估的競爭者“ Sonic”

在眾多區塊鏈項目中，“ Sonic”是最被低估的競爭者。而SEI，Berachain和Monad仍處於測試網階段

Author: @arndxt_xo

作者：@arndxt_xo

Among the numerous blockchain projects, “Sonic” stands out as the most underrated contender. While chains like Sei, Berachain, and Monad are still in the testnet phase, Sonic has already launched, boasting over 80 years of operational funding reserves, rapidly accumulating TVL (Total Value Locked), and rewarding developers in ways never attempted by other chains.

在眾多的區塊鏈項目中，“ Sonic”是最被低估的競爭者。儘管SEI，Berachain和Monad之類的連鎖店仍處於測試網階段，但Sonic已經推出，擁有80多年的運營資金儲備，迅速積累了TVL（總價值鎖定），並以其他鏈條從未嘗試過的方式來獎勵開發人員。

Sonic, known for its “10,000+ TPS,” “sub-second finality,” and the unique “FeeM model” (returning 90% of gas fees to developers), has already created a DeFi flywheel effect. Additionally, Sonic has launched a “$190 million” airdrop plan, attracting a large number of DeFi developers and yield farmers.

Sonic以其“ 10,000多個TP”，“次秒終結”和獨特的“ Feem模型”（將90％的汽油費用的開發人員返還給開發人員）而聞名。此外，Sonic啟動了“ 1.9億美元”的Airdrop計劃，吸引了大量的Defi開發商和屈服農民。

This article will delve into Sonic's background, technical advantages, tokenomics, and how to achieve up to “145,000% APY (Annual Percentage Yield)” through participation in the ecosystem.

本文將通過參與生態系統來深入研究Sonic的背景，技術優勢，標記學以及如何實現“ 145,000％的APY（年度百分比）”。

1. Background and Origin

1。背景和起源

By the end of 2024, Fantom officially rebranded to "@SonicLabs," returning to the Layer-1 (L1) battlefield, focusing on speed, ecosystem incentives, and cross-chain interoperability.

到2024年底，Fantom正式重新品牌為“ @soniclabs”，返回第1層（L1）戰場，專注於速度，生態系統激勵措施和跨鏈互操作性。

After Fantom's rebranding to Sonic in December 2024, the chain rapidly recovered from the bear market, quickly attracting a variety of DeFi protocols. Within just a few months, Sonic's TVL rapidly grew, with numerous new protocols choosing to launch on its chain.

在2024年12月，Fantom重新命名為Sonic之後，該連鎖店從熊市迅速恢復，迅速吸引了各種Fefi協議。在短短幾個月內，Sonic的TVL迅速增長，許多新協議選擇在其鏈條上推出。

After announcing the closure of its flagship fund in April 2025, a move that disappointed many Web3 users, the crypto startup Chainlink is now making a return with a new investment fund.

在2025年4月宣布關閉其旗艦基金之後，這一舉動使許多Web3用戶失望，Crypto Startup Chainlink現在正在通過新的投資基金獲得回報。

According to a statement released on Thursday, the blockchain middleware firm has partnered with BlockTower to create a $1.25 billion fund that will invest in early-stage blockchain startups. The fund, named BlockTower Coin Structure, is expected to have a ten-year lifespan and will primarily focus on startups developing new tokens and decentralized applications (dApps).

根據周四發布的一份聲明，區塊鏈中間件公司已與Blocktower合作創建了一個12.5億美元的基金，該基金將投資於早期的區塊鏈初創企業。該基金稱為Blocktower Coin結構，預計將擁有十年的壽命，並且將主要集中於開發新的代幣和分散應用程序（DAPPS）的初創公司。

The initiative to create the fund arose from BlockTower's observations of the rapid advancements in blockchain technology. As startups in the space continue to innovate, they are encountering challenges in securing sufficient capital for development.

創建該基金的計劃源於Blocktower對區塊鏈技術快速發展的觀察。隨著空間中的初創公司繼續進行創新，他們在確保足夠的發展資本方面遇到了挑戰。

Despite the crypto winter and the subsequent bear market, blockchain startups have persevered and achieved significant progress, particularly in scaling their technology and expanding their user bases.

儘管加密冬季和隨後的熊市市場，區塊鏈初創公司仍然堅持不懈並取得了重大進展，尤其是在擴展其技術和擴展其用戶基礎方面。

"We've seen firsthand the incredible innovation happening in Web3, with startups building groundbreaking protocols and applications that are pushing the boundaries of what's possible," said Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) partner and BlockTower co-founder Ivan Bogatyrev.

Andreessen Horowitz（A16Z）合作夥伴和Blocktower聯合創始人Ivan Bogatyrev說：“我們已經看到了Web3中發生的令人難以置信的創新，而初創公司構建了開創性的協議和應用程序，這些協議和應用程序正在推動可能的界限。”

"However, many promising startups are struggling to get the capital they need to fully realize their vision," added Bogatyrev, who previously worked as a portfolio manager at Point72.

Bogatyrev補充說：“但是，許多有前途的初創公司都在努力獲得所需的資金。”

In addition to Bogatyrev, BlockTower's team includes former executives from Alameda Research, TRADEM8, and Flow Traders. The firm currently manages around $5 billion in assets across various funds.

除了Bogatyrev外，Blocktower的團隊還包括來自Alameda Research，Stradem8和Flow Traders的前高管。該公司目前管理著大約50億美元的各種資金資產。

The new fund is expected to play a crucial role in supporting the next generation of blockchain startups as they strive to revolutionize the financial and technological landscape.

預計新基金將在支持下一代的區塊鏈初創企業中發揮至關重要的作用，因為他們努力徹底改變財務和技術景觀。

2. DeFi Flywheel Effect

2。defi飛輪效應

The core of the DeFi flywheel effect lies in the time mismatch between capital deployment and value realization:

Defi飛輪效應的核心在於資本部署與價值實現之間的時間不匹配：

In 2022, heavyweight figure Andre Cronje (founder of Yearn Finance) introduced the “ve(3,3) model” through the Solidly exchange on Fantom. This model combines Curve Finance's veToken mechanism and Olympus DAO's (3,3) game theory, aiming to reduce sell pressure and reward liquidity providers through long-term token locking.

在2022年，重量級人物安德烈·克朗耶（Andre Cronje）（渴望的遺產創始人）通過Fantom的穩固交流引入了“ VE（3,3）模型”。該模型結合了Curve Finance的Vetken機制和Olympus Dao（3,3）的遊戲理論，旨在通過長期的令牌鎖定來減少賣出壓力和獎勵流動性提供商。

However, the flywheel effect is not perpetual. When liquidity growth slows and early participants begin to exit, the flywheel effect weakens. Sonic's emergence is precisely to address this issue.

但是，飛輪效應並非永久。當流動性增長速度減慢並且早期參與者開始退出時，飛輪效應會減弱。 Sonic的出現正是解決這個問題的。

3. Sonic's Technical Advantages

3。Sonic的技術優勢

1. Speed

1。速度

Sonic adopts a parallel EVM execution strategy, processing multiple transactions simultaneously, achieving 10,000+ TPS even under high load. In contrast, Ethereum 1.0 can only handle around 15 TPS, and new L1s like Monad claim up to 10,000 TPS but are still in the testnet phase.

Sonic採用了平行的EVM執行策略，同時處理多項交易，即使在高負載下也達到了10,000多個TPS。相比之下，以太坊1.0只能處理約15個TP，而New L1（如Monad）聲稱高達10,000 TP，但仍處於測試網階段。

2. Interoperability

2。互操作性

Sonic has integrated cross-chain bridges early on, enabling direct asset transfer between different chains. This contrasts with L1s like Arbitrum and Optimism, which require third-party cross-chain services.

Sonic早期已經整合了跨鏈橋，從而使不同鏈之間的資產轉移能夠直接轉移。這與需要第三方跨鏈服務等L1等L1形成對比。

3. Incentive Mechanism

3。激勵機制

Sonic's "FeeM model" allocates 90% of gas fees to developers, encouraging them to build projects and attract users. This contrasts with other chains where developers bear the gas fees, hindering small-scale project development.

Sonic的“ Feem模型”將90％的汽油費分配給開發人員，鼓勵他們建立項目並吸引用戶。這與開發人員承擔汽油費的其他連鎖店形成鮮明對比，從而阻礙了小規模的項目開發。

4. Smart Contracts

4。智能合約

Sonic's smart contract security is continuously audited by leading

Sonic的智能合同安全被領導不斷審核