由於與鯨魚驅動的市場操縱有關的越來越多的問題，Hyplliquid從其清單中刪除了Jellyjelly。

週三，超流動型面對另一次鯨魚操縱攻擊（兩週內的第二位），當用戶縮短了Solana Memecoin的Jellyjelly，迫使該協議遭受了重大損失。

Hyperliquid, a leading decentralized exchange protocol, encountered substantial issues related to whale-driven market manipulation, leading to the removal of JELLYJELLY from its listings.

領先的分散交換協議Hyproliquid遇到了與鯨魚驅動的市場操縱有關的實質性問題，從而導致Jellyjelly從其列表中刪除。

On Wednesday, Hyperliquid faced another whale manipulation attack—its second in two weeks—when a user shorted JELLYJELLY, a Solana memecoin, forcing the protocol to take on substantial losses.

週三，超流動型面對另一次鯨魚操縱攻擊（兩週內的第二位），當用戶縮短了Solana Memecoin的Jellyjelly，迫使該協議遭受了重大損失。

While a whale dumped JELLYJELLY on decentralized exchanges, wallet “0xde96” placed a short bet on the token, leading to a steep price drop that caused Hyperliquid’s HLP vault to take over the short position.

一條鯨魚在分散的交流中傾倒了果凍，而錢包“ 0xde96”對令牌進行了短暫的賭注，導致價格下降，導致超流利的HLP拱頂佔據了短期位置。

Following this, wallet “0x20e8,” which had just been created, entered a long trade on the token.

此後，剛剛創建的錢包“ 0x20E8”在令牌上進行了長時間的交易。

As seen on Lookonchain’s analysis, the move significantly increased HLP’s unrealized losses, which reached roughly $12 million.

從Lookonchain的分析中可以看出，此舉大大增加了HLP未實現的損失，大約達到了1200萬美元。

As Hyperliquid scrambled to mitigate the issue, certain social media users speculated that competing centralized exchanges might list JELLYJELLY futures to encourage trading and destabilize Hyperliquid.

當超級流動障礙以減輕問題時，某些社交媒體用戶推測，競爭的集中式交流可能會列出果凍的期貨，以鼓勵交易和破壞超級流動性的穩定。

Some users suggested that if the token’s price hit a critical mark, the HLP vault could face complete liquidation.

一些用戶建議，如果令牌的價格達到了關鍵標記，HLP保管庫可能會完全清算。

Within approximately an hour, Binance and OKX launched JELLYJELLY perpetual futures.

在大約一個小時的時間內，Binance和OKX推出了Jellyjelly永久未來。

At that exact time, Hyperliquid discontinued JELLYJELLY trading and restricted access to the contract.

在那個確切的時間，超流動性停止了Jellyjelly交易並限制了對合同的訪問。

“After evidence of suspicious market activity, the validator set convened and voted to delist JELLY perps,” the protocol announced.

該協議宣布：“經過可疑市場活動的證據，驗證者設置並投票贊成Delist Jelly Perps。”

“All users apart from flagged addresses will be made whole from the Hyper Foundation. This will be done automatically in the coming days based on onchain data,” the team said.

該團隊說：“除標記地址外，所有用戶都將從超級基礎中整體進行。這將在未來幾天根據OnChain數據自動完成。”

HLP’s 24-hour pnl as of writing is approximately 700k USDC. Technical improvements will be made, and the network will grow stronger as a result of lessons learned. More details will be shared shortly.

截至寫作時，HLP的24小時PNL約為70萬美元。將進行技術改進，並且由於學習的教訓，網絡將變得更加強大。更多詳細信息將很快分享。

The Block’s HYPE price data showed that Hyperliquid’s token dropped sharply by 22% at the height of the incident but later regained some ground, reducing its loss to around 10%.

該塊的炒作價格數據顯示，在事件的高峰期，Hyplliquid的代幣急劇下降了22％，但後來又恢復了一定的地位，將其損失降至10％左右。

Venmo co-founder Iqram Magdon-Ismail launched JELLYJELLY, a memecoin, in collaboration with Sam Lessin, an early investor in Venmo.

Venmo聯合創始人Iqram Magdon-Islail與Venmo的早期投資者Sam Lessin合作推出了Memecoin Jellyjelly。

“As a self diagnosed chaotic neutral whose hero is Jack Sparrow … I highly approve of this insane crypto war playing out between degens, whales, and crypto trading platforms using JMJ even if I have nothing to do with it and only half understand it!” Lessin posted on X.

“作為一個自我診斷的混亂中立，他的英雄是傑克·斯派洛（Jack Sparrow）……我高度贊同這場瘋狂的加密戰爭在Degens，Whales和Crypto Trading Platform之間使用JMJ發揮作用，即使我與它無關，只有一半理解它！” Lessin發佈在X上。

Earlier in March, Hyperliquid experienced another whale manipulation attack when a whale created a $306 million ether long position on March 12, leading to a $1.86 million profit after withdrawing 17 million USDC.

3月初，當一條鯨魚在3月12日建立了3.06億美元的以太長職位時，超級流動性遭受了另一次鯨魚操縱攻擊，導致撤回1700萬美元後，造成了186萬美元的利潤。

At the time, speculation pointed to an exploit, but Hyperliquid’s team insisted that the problem arose because its trading engine wasn’t designed to handle such a large position.

當時，猜測指出了一個利用，但是超流動的團隊堅持認為問題出現了，因為其交易引擎並非旨在處理如此龐大的職位。