黃金倡導者 Peter Schiff 遺憾錯過比特幣繁榮

著名黃金倡導者彼得希夫 (Peter Schiff) 後悔沒有投資比特幣。儘管持懷疑態度，希夫承認比特幣的漲幅超過了他的歐洲太平洋黃金基金，凸顯了傳統資產和數位資產的不同路徑。雖然黃金未能在動盪的市場中發揮作用，但比特幣提供了可觀的回報，迫使希夫承認 2010 年的投資可能會非常有利可圖。這一比較強調了投資組合多元化以及緊跟市場趨勢和新興機會的重要性。

Schiff Admits Bitcoin Regret

希夫承認對比特幣感到遺憾

Gold advocate Peter Schiff has swallowed his pride and admitted that he missed the boat on Bitcoin. In a recent interview with Tom Bilyeu, Schiff expressed remorse over not investing in Bitcoin when it was still relatively cheap.

黃金倡導者彼得·希夫（Peter Schiff）放下了自己的驕傲，承認自己錯過了比特幣的機會。在最近接受 Tom Bilyeu 採訪時，希夫對在比特幣相對便宜時沒有投資比特幣表示悔恨。

Gold's Lackluster Performance vs. Bitcoin's Gains

黃金表現不佳與比特幣上漲

As Schiff's EuroPacific Gold Fund has faltered, Bitcoin has soared to astronomical heights. If you had invested $10,000 in Schiff's fund in 2013, you would have lost money today. By contrast, if you had invested the same amount in Bitcoin, you would be a multimillionaire.

隨著希夫的歐洲太平洋黃金基金的步履蹣跚，比特幣卻飆升至天文數字的高度。如果您在 2013 年向希夫基金投資了 10,000 美元，那麼您今天就會虧損。相比之下，如果您在比特幣上投資了相同的金額，您將成為百萬富翁。

When Gold's Luster Fades, Bitcoin Shines

當黃金的光芒褪去時，比特幣閃耀

The stark performance contrast highlights the shifting dynamics of traditional and digital assets. Gold funds, once considered safe havens, may not always deliver when markets get choppy. On the other hand, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, despite their volatility, can offer extraordinary returns for the risk-tolerant.

鮮明的表現對比凸顯了傳統資產和數位資產的動態變化。曾經被視為避風港的黃金基金在市場波動時可能並不總是能發揮作用。另一方面，像比特幣這樣的加密貨幣儘管具有波動性，但可以為風險承受者提供非凡的回報。

Traditional vs. Digital Investments: A Tale of Two Returns

傳統投資與數位投資：兩種回報的故事

Bitcoin's price has soared over 132% in the past year, while Schiff's EuroPac Gold Fund has declined by 5%. This disparity illustrates the difference between traditional and digital investments. It also emphasizes the importance of diversification and staying attuned to emerging investment trends.

比特幣的價格在過去一年飆升了 132% 以上，而 Schiff 的 EuroPac 黃金基金則下跌了 5%。這種差異說明了傳統投資和數位投資之間的差異。它也強調了多元化和緊跟新興投資趨勢的重要性。

Uncertainty Looms over Gold and Bitcoin

黃金和比特幣面臨不確定性

The future of both gold and Bitcoin remains uncertain. Gold has the advantage of tangibility and established uses, while Bitcoin presents the potential for revolutionary disruption. Which asset will ultimately prevail remains to be seen.

黃金和比特幣的未來仍然不確定。黃金具有有形性和既定用途的優勢，而比特幣則具有革命性顛覆的潛力。哪種資產最終會佔上風還有待觀察。

Schiff's Gold Bias vs. Bitcoin's Rising Tide

希夫的黃金偏見與比特幣的上漲趨勢

Schiff has long championed gold as the ideal hedge against uncertainty. However, Bitcoin's rapid rise suggests that precious metals may not be the only dependable store of value. Bitcoin's decentralized nature, limited supply, and global adoption have fueled its meteoric rise, attracting investors who see it as a modern-day digital gold.

希夫長期以來一直主張黃金是抵禦不確定性的理想對沖工具。然而，比特幣的快速崛起表明貴金屬可能不是唯一可靠的價值儲存手段。比特幣的去中心化性質、有限的供應和全球採用推動了其迅速崛起，吸引了將其視為現代數位黃金的投資者。