FTX 創辦人 Sam Bankman-Fried 因數十億美元詐欺而面臨判刑

Sam Bankman-Fried Faces Sentencing for Multibillion-Dollar FTX Fraud

Sam Bankman-Fried 因 FTX 數十億美元詐欺而面臨判刑

On Thursday, Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced founder of the now-defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX, will face sentencing for orchestrating one of the most egregious financial frauds in recent history. According to federal prosecutors, Bankman-Fried bilked FTX customers out of over $8 billion through a complex web of illicit transactions and deceptive practices.

週四，現已解散的加密貨幣交易所 FTX 名譽掃地的創始人 Sam Bankman-Fried 將因策劃近代史上最嚴重的金融詐欺案之一而面臨判刑。據聯邦檢察官稱，Bankman-Fried 透過複雜的非法交易和欺騙行為網絡，從 FTX 客戶身上騙了超過 80 億美元。

While prosecutors seek a lengthy prison sentence, Bankman-Fried's legal team contends that FTX customers could potentially recover all of their lost funds, creating a significant disparity in the sentencing recommendations. The judge presiding over the case, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, is tasked with navigating this divide and determining the appropriate punishment for Bankman-Fried's crimes.

雖然檢察官尋求長期監禁，但 Bankman-Fried 的法律團隊認為，FTX 客戶有可能收回所有損失的資金，導致量刑建議有巨大差異。主審此案的美國地區法官劉易斯·卡普蘭 (Lewis Kaplan) 的任務是彌合這一分歧，並確定對班克曼-弗里德罪行的適當懲罰。

The Prosecution's Case

檢方的案件

Prosecutors argue that Bankman-Fried's actions warrant a severe sentence due to the magnitude of the fraud, the intentional deception involved, and the significant financial losses suffered by FTX customers. They assert that Bankman-Fried's fraudulent scheme was driven by a desire for personal enrichment and a reckless disregard for the well-being of his investors.

檢察官認為，鑑於欺詐的嚴重程度、所涉及的故意欺騙以及 FTX 客戶遭受的重大財務損失，Bankman-Fried 的行為應該判處嚴厲的判決。他們聲稱，班克曼-弗里德的詐欺計畫是出於個人致富的慾望和對投資人福祉的魯莽漠視。

The prosecution's sentencing memorandum meticulously details Bankman-Fried's fraudulent activities, including the misuse of customer funds to finance lavish personal expenses, political contributions, and risky investments. Prosecutors maintain that Bankman-Fried's actions were not merely negligent but rather a deliberate attempt to deceive and defraud FTX customers.

檢方的量刑備忘錄詳細描述了班克曼-弗里德的詐欺活動，包括濫用客戶資金來支付巨額個人開支、政治捐款和風險投資。檢察官堅稱，Bankman-Fried 的行為不僅是疏忽，而且是故意欺騙和詐騙 FTX 客戶。

The Defense's Arguments

辯方的論點

Bankman-Fried's legal team, led by Mark Cohen, presents a different narrative, arguing that their client's actions do not warrant a lengthy prison sentence. They contend that Bankman-Fried is a complex individual who made significant mistakes but did not intentionally set out to harm FTX customers.

由馬克·科恩 (Mark Cohen) 領導的班克曼·弗里德 (Bankman-Fried) 法律團隊提出了不同的說法，認為他們的客戶的行為並不需要判處長期監禁。他們認為 Bankman-Fried 是一個複雜的個人，他犯了重大錯誤，但並不是故意傷害 FTX 客戶。

The defense emphasizes that Bankman-Fried's primary focus was on growing FTX and expanding its customer base. They argue that his decisions were driven by a desire to innovate and disrupt the cryptocurrency industry, not by malicious intent.

辯方強調，Bankman-Fried 的主要關注點是發展 FTX 並擴大其客戶群。他們認為，他的決定是出於創新和顛覆加密貨幣產業的願望，而不是出於惡意。

Moreover, the defense points to the potential recovery of FTX customer funds through the bankruptcy proceedings as a mitigating factor. They argue that Bankman-Fried's cooperation with bankruptcy lawyers and his efforts to identify and recover lost assets should be considered in his sentencing.

此外，辯方指出，透過破產程序可能收回 FTX 客戶資金，作為減輕處罰的因素。他們認為，在量刑時應考慮班克曼-弗里德與破產律師的合作以及他為查明和追回損失資產所做的努力。

The Judge's Considerations

法官的考慮

Judge Kaplan has the ultimate authority to determine Bankman-Fried's sentence. In doing so, he must balance the seriousness of the crimes with the defendant's personal circumstances and any mitigating factors presented by the defense.

卡普蘭法官擁有決定班克曼-弗里德刑期的最終權力。在此過程中，他必須平衡犯罪的嚴重性、被告的個人情況以及辯方提出的任何減輕處罰的因素。

One key issue for the judge to consider is the intended loss versus the actual loss. Prosecutors argue that Bankman-Fried should be held accountable for the full amount of customer funds that were at risk, regardless of whether they were ultimately recovered. The defense, on the other hand, contends that the judge should focus on the actual losses incurred by customers, which may be significantly lower due to the efforts of bankruptcy lawyers.

法官需要考慮的一個關鍵問題是預期損失與實際損失。檢察官認為，班克曼-弗里德應對處於風險中的全部客戶資金負責，無論這些資金最終是否被追回。另一方面，辯方認為，法官應該關注客戶遭受的實際損失，由於破產律師的努力，實際損失可能會大大降低。

Neurodivergence and Sentencing

神經分歧和量刑

Another factor that may influence Bankman-Fried's sentencing is his alleged neurodivergence. His family and legal team have suggested that he exhibits behavioral characteristics associated with neurodivergent individuals, such as autism or ADHD.

另一個可能影響班克曼-弗里德量刑的因素是他所謂的神經分歧。他的家人和法律團隊認為他表現出與神經分歧個體相關的行為特徵，例如自閉症或過動症。

However, prosecutors have not directly addressed the issue of neurodivergence in their sentencing memorandum, instead focusing on Bankman-Fried's intelligence, education, and previous experience as factors that demonstrate his culpability.

然而，檢察官並沒有在量刑備忘錄中直接提及神經分歧問題，而是將班克曼-弗里德的智力、教育程度和以往的經歷作為證明他有罪的因素。

The judge will ultimately decide whether Bankman-Fried's alleged neurodivergence warrants any leniency in sentencing.

法官將最終決定班克曼-弗里德所謂的神經分歧是否值得寬大量刑。

Conclusion

結論

Sam Bankman-Fried's sentencing hearing is a highly anticipated event that will determine the consequences for one of the most high-profile financial crimes in recent memory. The outcome of the hearing will not only impact Bankman-Fried's personal future but also send a message to other individuals and entities engaged in the cryptocurrency industry.

薩姆·班克曼-弗里德的量刑聽證會是一場備受期待的事件，它將決定近期記憶中最引人注目的金融犯罪之一的後果。聽證會的結果不僅會影響班克曼-弗里德的個人未來，還會向從事加密貨幣行業的其他個人和實體發出訊息。