Coinbase支持的Instagram CopyCat Zora對用戶感到沮喪，並有許多有爭議的決定

首先，幾乎沒有警告，它終止了多年來對NFTS（ERC-721）對創作者的支持，以支持ERC-20型的Memecoins。

Coinbase-supported Instagram copycat Zora has frustrated users with a number of controversial decisions that appear to completely go against its previous stances on several of its offerings.

Coinbase支持的Instagram CopyCat Zora使用戶做出了許多有爭議的決定，這些決策似乎完全違背了其以前的幾個產品的立場。

First, with little warning, it terminated years of its support for NFTs (ERC-721s) for creators in favor of ERC-20-like memecoins.

首先，幾乎沒有警告，它終止了多年來對NFTS（ERC-721）對創作者的支持，以支持ERC-20型的Memecoins。

Second, as a way to underhandedly hand out money to disgruntled users, it announced an airdrop. However, it withheld all governance rights and granted itself a 45% allocation for team and strategic contributors plus 25% to the project-controlled treasury and liquidity pools.

其次，為了向不滿的用戶分發資金，它宣布了一個空投。但是，它保留了所有治理權利，並為團隊和戰略貢獻者授予了45％的分配，以及25％的政府權利，對項目控制的財政部和流動性池進行了分配。

Crypto sleuth ZachXBT summed up the feelings of many members, saying, “Why does the token need to exist at all if it serves absolutely zero purpose?” Zach also called it “just embarrassing for the space.”

Crypto Sleuth Zachxbt總結了許多成員的感受，他說：“如果代幣絕對零目的，為什麼它根本需要存在？”扎克還稱其為“只是為空間感到尷尬。”

Let me get this right…Coinbase invests in early round of ZoraBase team then hard shills a dying product to increase activity knowing airdrop is coming within days without any transparencyAre we actually serious right now 😭 https://t.co/8GsaxQ6ctJ

讓我正確地做到這一點……Coinbase投資於Zorabase團隊的早期一輪，然後硬使用垂死的產品，以增加活動，知道Airdrop在幾天之內就在沒有任何透明度的情況下來了，我們實際上實際上是認真的。

The NFT-based social media platform pivots to content coins

基於NFT的社交媒體平台樞轉於內容硬幣

Zora pivoted to turning social media posts into tradable coins with no warning, a move that several artists, who had been using the platform to mint NFTs since 2021, found frustrating. Instead of finding that they could mint NFTs, they found that they could mint ERC-20-based “creator coins.”

佐拉（Zora）旋轉著將社交媒體帖子變成可交易的硬幣而沒有警告，這一舉動是，幾位藝術家自2021年以來一直在使用該平台鑄造NFTS的藝術家感到沮喪。他們沒有發現他們可以鑄造NFT，而是發現他們可以鑄造基於ERC-20的“創建者硬幣”。

When a Zora user posts to the social platform, the Coinbase Base-supported project generates a new token with a supply of 1 billion, some of which goes to the post’s creator. The creator also earns 1% of the trading fees from its UniSwap listing, Zora explained.

當Zora用戶發佈到社交平台時，Coinbase Base支持的項目會產生一個新的令牌，其中有10億，其中一些供應到該職位的創建者。 Zora解釋說，創作者還從其UNISWAP上市獲得了1％的交易費用。

Zora and Base touted so-called content coins as an easy way for creators to earn money from their posts. Of course, in practice, the surprise launch disproportionately benefited early insiders and key opinion leader accounts like Base itself.

Zora和Base吹捧了所謂的內容硬幣，作為創作者從帖子中賺錢的簡便方法。當然，實際上，驚喜發射不成比例地使早期的內部人士和基本本身等關鍵意見領袖帳戶受益。

‘Base is for everyone’… And is 74% below its high

“基礎是每個人”……並且低74％

The Ethereum-based layer 2 blockchain founded by Coinbase launched a content coin that initially seemed to be the first token launch by the massive project. In less than two hours, confused traders bid up the BASEISFOREVERYONE token to a market capitalization of $15 million.

由Coinbase建立的基於以太坊的第2層區塊鏈推出了一枚內容硬幣，該硬幣最初似乎是大型項目的第一個令牌發射。在不到兩個小時的時間裡，困惑的交易員競標了Baseisforeveryone代幣的市值1500萬美元。

As the community realized it wasn’t actually an official Base token, it crashed 94% in seven minutes.

由於社區意識到它實際上不是官方的基礎令牌，因此在七分鐘內撞車94％。

The price of BASEISFOREVERYONE remains 74% below its all-time high as of publication time.

截至出版時間，baseforeveryone的價格仍低於其歷史最高的74％。

The Zora ‘airdrop just for fun’

Zora“ Airdrop只是為了娛樂”

The crypto sleuth described content coins as a good way to convince larger creators to stop using Zora’s platform.

加密偵探將內容硬幣描述為說服大型創作者停止使用Zora平台的好方法。

The airdrop of ZORA tokens, which are entirely distinct from BASEISFOREVERYONE, will also give tokenholders no governance rights. Normally, airdrop and proprietary tokens give users at least some sort of voting rights in a project.

Zora代幣的空投完全與Baseforeveryone完全不同，也將賦予令牌者沒有治理權利。通常，空調和專有代幣在項目中至少賦予用戶某種投票權。

“ZORA is for fun only, and does not entitle its holders to any governance rights or a claim on any equity ownership in Zora or its products or services,” its legal team disclaimed.

其法律團隊否認：“ Zora僅是為了娛樂，並且不享有其持有人的任何治理權利或Zora中任何權益所有權或其產品或服務股權的索賠。”

Got a tip? Send us an email or ProtonMail. For more informed news, follow us on X, Instagram, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

有小費嗎？給我們發送電子郵件或質子郵件。有關更多知情的新聞，請在X，Instagram，Bluesky和Google News上關注我們，或訂閱我們的YouTube頻道。