比特幣的彈性：為什麼政治領導力沒有你想像的那麼重要

2024年美國總統大選後，加密貨幣市場大幅上漲，比特幣創出新高

The cryptocurrency market has surged after the 2024 U.S. presidential election, with Bitcoin reaching new highs amid a wave of institutional adoption. While many attribute this success to the current administration's crypto-friendly stance, cryptocurrency’s fundamental resilience might outlast any political leadership.

2024 年美國總統大選後，加密貨幣市場飆升，比特幣在機構採用浪潮中創下新高。儘管許多人將這一成功歸因於現任政府對加密貨幣友好的立場，但加密貨幣的基本彈性可能比任何政治領導都更持久。

Consider an alternative scenario: What if Kamala Harris had won the presidency, maintaining Gary Gensler's leadership at the SEC and potentially intensifying the regulatory crackdown on cryptocurrency markets? While the immediate market reaction might have been negative, historical evidence suggests that cryptocurrency's long-term trajectory might not have been significantly altered.

考慮另一個情況：如果卡馬拉·哈里斯（Kamala Harris）贏得總統職位，維持加里·詹斯勒（Gary Gensler）在SEC 的領導地位，並可能加強對加密貨幣市場的監管打擊，結果會怎樣？雖然市場的直接反應可能是負面的，但歷史證據表明，加密貨幣的長期軌跡可能不會發生重大變化。

The most compelling evidence for this argument comes from studying how cryptocurrencies have performed under various regulatory pressures. Take Monero, for instance. Despite facing severe restrictions and being delisted from major exchanges like Binance, OKX, and Kraken between 2021 and 2024, Monero has demonstrated remarkable resilience. Not only has it maintained a substantial market capitalization of over $4 billion, but it has also seen steady organic growth in usage and adoption, even without access to mainstream trading platforms.

這論點最有說服力的證據來自於研究加密貨幣在各種監管壓力下的表現。以門羅幣為例。儘管在 2021 年至 2024 年間面臨嚴格限制並從幣安、OKX 和 Kraken 等主要交易所退市，門羅幣仍然表現出了非凡的韌性。它不僅保持了超過 40 億美元的龐大市值，而且即使無法訪問主流交易平台，其使用量和採用率也實現了穩定的自然成長。

This resilience isn't coincidental – it's architectural. Satoshi Nakamoto's fundamental insight wasn't just about creating digital money; it was about designing systems that could withstand opposition from powerful institutions. The core innovation of blockchain technology lies in its ability to create networks that are incredibly difficult to censor or shut down, regardless of the regulatory environment they operate in.

這種彈性並非巧合，而是建築性的。中本聰的基本見解不僅在於創造數位貨幣；還在於創造數位貨幣。這是關於設計能夠抵禦強大機構反對的系統。區塊鏈技術的核心創新在於它能夠創建極其難以審查或關閉的網絡，無論其運行的監管環境如何。

Under a Harris administration, we might have seen:

在哈里斯政府的領導下，我們可能會看到：

While these measures would likely have triggered short-term market volatility and potentially delayed institutional adoption, they wouldn't have addressed the fundamental feature that makes cryptocurrencies resilient: their decentralized architecture. Just as Monero has demonstrated that a cryptocurrency can thrive despite being effectively banned from mainstream exchanges, Bitcoin's network would continue to process transactions and maintain its integrity regardless of regulatory headwinds.

雖然這些措施可能會引發短期市場波動並可能延遲機構採用，但它們並沒有解決使加密貨幣具有彈性的基本特徵：其去中心化架構。正如門羅幣已經證明，儘管被主流交易所有效禁止，加密貨幣仍然可以蓬勃發展，比特幣網路將繼續處理交易並保持其完整性，無論監管阻力如何。

TikTok Ban Live Updates: App Shuts Down As US Ban Starts—Trump Posts ‘SAVE TIKTOK’

TikTok 禁令即時更新：隨著美國禁令的開始，應用程式被關閉——川普發布“拯救 TIKTOK”

TikTok Ban: Apple Issues ‘Unprecedented’ Response For iPhone Users

TikTok 禁令：蘋果對 iPhone 用戶發出「前所未有」的回應

TikTok Ban Shuts Down App—Does A VPN Bring It Back?

TikTok 禁令關閉了應用程式——VPN 能否讓它恢復？

The immediate price impact of a Harris victory might have been substantial – perhaps even triggering a significant market correction. However, the long-term trajectory of cryptocurrency adoption would likely have remained intact, albeit potentially following a different path. Instead of ETFs and institutional investment vehicles, we might have seen greater emphasis on peer-to-peer trading and decentralized finance platforms.

哈里斯獲勝對價格的直接影響可能是巨大的，甚至可能引發市場大幅調整。然而，加密貨幣採用的長期軌跡可能會保持不變，儘管可能會走不同的道路。我們可能會看到對點對點交易和去中心化金融平台的更多重視，而不是 ETF 和機構投資工具。

This isn't to suggest that political leadership and regulatory frameworks don't matter – they clearly influence how cryptocurrencies integrate with traditional financial systems and how quickly institutional adoption occurs. However, the core value proposition of cryptocurrencies – their ability to facilitate permissionless, censorship-resistant transactions – remains intact regardless of the regulatory environment.

這並不是說政治領導和監管框架不重要——它們明顯影響加密貨幣與傳統金融體系的整合方式以及機構採用的速度。然而，無論監管環境如何，加密貨幣的核心價值主張——它們促進無需許可、抗審查交易的能力——都保持不變。

Consider how Bitcoin has already survived numerous significant challenges:

考慮一下比特幣是如何經受住許多重大挑戰的：

Each of these events caused temporary market disruptions but ultimately failed to prevent Bitcoin's long-term growth and adoption. This pattern suggests that while political leadership can influence the path cryptocurrency adoption takes, it has limited power to prevent that adoption entirely.

這些事件都造成了暫時的市場混亂，但最終未能阻止比特幣的長期成長和採用。這種模式表明，雖然政治領導可以影響加密貨幣採用的路徑，但它完全阻止這種採用的權力有限。

Regulators Have Failed To Ban Monero

監管機構未能禁止門羅幣

Monero's experience provides a particularly instructive example. Despite facing perhaps the most severe restrictions of any major cryptocurrency, it has maintained both its network security and its utility for users who prioritize privacy. This resilience demonstrates that once a cryptocurrency network achieves a certain level of decentralization and user adoption, it becomes remarkably difficult to suppress through regulatory action alone.

門羅幣的經驗提供了一個特別有啟發性的例子。儘管面臨著可能是所有主要加密貨幣中最嚴格的限制，但它仍然保持了網路安全性和對優先考慮隱私的用戶的實用性。這種彈性表明，一旦加密貨幣網路實現一定程度的去中心化和用戶採用，僅透過監管行動就變得非常難以抑制。

The engineering insights behind cryptocurrencies' censorship resistance are proving more durable than many expected. The ability to create consensus across a distributed network without central coordination, combined with economic incentives that encourage network participation, has created systems that are remarkably resistant to external pressure – whether that pressure comes from regulators, traditional financial institutions, or even nation-states.

事實證明，加密貨幣抗審查背後的工程見解比許多人預期的更持久。在沒有中央協調的情況下在分散式網路上達成共識的能力，再加上鼓勵網路參與的經濟激勵措施，已經創建了能夠顯著抵抗外部壓力的系統——無論這種壓力來自監管機構、傳統金融機構，甚至民族國家。

Bitcoin Is Not Dependent On Donald Trump

比特幣不依賴唐納德·川普

This isn't to say that a Harris administration wouldn't have affected the cryptocurrency ecosystem. The path to mainstream adoption might have looked very different, with more emphasis on technological development and grassroots adoption rather than institutional investment vehicles. However, the fundamental value proposition and network effects of major cryptocurrencies would likely have remained intact.

這並不是說哈里斯政府不會影響加密貨幣生態系統。主流採用的道路可能看起來非常不同，更強調技術開發和基層採用，而不是機構投資工具。然而，主要加密貨幣的基本價值主張和網路效應可能保持不變。

In essence, while political leadership certainly influences how cryptocurrencies integrate with traditional financial systems, the underlying resilience of these networks – built into their very architecture – ensures their survival regardless of the regulatory environment. This technological resilience, more than any political support or opposition, may be cryptocurrency's most valuable feature.

從本質上講，雖然政治領導肯定會影響加密貨幣與傳統金融系統的整合方式，但這些網路的潛在彈性（內建於其架構中）確保了它們的生存，無論監管環境如何。這種技術彈性比任何政治支持或反對都更重要，可能是加密貨幣最有價值的特徵。