基本（L2）網絡在提升了一個崩潰90％的地毯模因後面臨反彈

嚴格的編輯政策，側重於準確性，相關性和公正性

Coinbase’s Layer-2 (L2) Network, Base, has faced criticism from the crypto community after it was involved in an unofficial memecoin rug-pull that saw the token crash by over 90%.

Coinbase的第2層（L2）網絡Base，在加密社區參與了一個非正式的Memecoin地毯扣後，面臨著代幣超過90％以上的批評。

The incident began when Base’s official X (formerly Twitter) account posted an image with the text “Base is for everyone.” Shortly after, they shared a link to the on-chain social protocol Zora and the caption “Coined it.”

該事件始於Base的官方X（以前是Twitter）帳戶，上面發布了帶有文字“ Base Is For所有人”的圖像。不久之後，他們分享了指向鏈上社會協議Zora和標題“創造”的鏈接。

The protocol allows users to make social media posts into tradable tokens, automatically minting them. After Base’s post was turned into a token, the crypto community quickly drove up its market capitalization to $17 million.

該協議允許用戶將社交媒體發佈到可交易的令牌中，從而自動鑄造它們。在Base的職位變成令牌之後，加密貨幣社區迅速將其市值提高到1700萬美元。

However, online reports showed that the memecoin collapsed by around 92% after the top holders, who had 47% of the supply, sold the memecoin a little over an hour after launching.

但是，在線報告顯示，在供應量佔47％的頂級持有人之後，紀念物倒塌了約92％，在推出後一個多小時就出售了Memecoin。

“The token got HORRIFICALLY sniped. A bunch of the top holders (who have no presence on X) ganged up and sold the token after an hour of launching, taking it from $1.6 to $0.16,” one user wrote.

一位用戶寫道：“代幣被淘汰了。一群頂級持有人（在X上沒有任何存在）在發射一個小時後就拿到了代幣，從1.6美元到0.16美元。”一位用戶寫道。

On-chain data analytics platform Lookonchain added that “3 wallets bought a large amount of ‘Base is for everyone’ before Base posted and sold them, making a profit of ~666K.”

鏈上數據分析平台Lookonchain補充說：“ 3個錢包購買了大量的“基礎是給所有人”，然後才出售它們，從而獲利了約66.6萬。”

Following the incident, members of the crypto community took to X to slam the network’s team for the memecoin and asked them to “stop launching worthless tokens that will all inevitably go to 0. You are diluting your brand and the value of real base assets.”

事件發生後，加密社區的成員登上X猛擊網絡團隊為Memecoin猛擊，並要求他們“停止啟動毫無價值的代幣，這一切都將不可避免地達到0。您正在稀釋您的品牌和實際基礎資產的價值。”

Zora data shows Base has earned around $81,000 from the memecoin, which has recovered from the initial sell-off with a peak market capitalization of $26 million before retracing to the $9 million-$10 million range.

Zora數據顯示，基地已經從Memecoin中賺取了約81,000美元，該Memecoin已從最初的拋售中恢復過來，峰值市值為2600萬美元，然後回收到900萬美元至1000萬美元。

In response to the backlash, Base clarified that they will never sell their holdings, but they weren’t an official network token either. The team explained that they posted on Zora because they believe everyone should bring content on-chain and use the tools that make it possible.

為了應對強烈反對，基地澄清說，他們永遠不會出售自己的股份，但也不是官方的網絡令牌。團隊解釋說，他們在Zora上發布了，因為他們相信每個人都應該攜帶內容鏈，並使用使其成為可能的工具。

Memes. Moments. Culture. If we want the future to be onchain, we have to be willing to experiment in public. That’s what we’re doing. To be clear, Base will never sell these tokens, and these are not official network tokens for Base, Coinbase, or any other related product. The content we share is creative, and we’re going to keep bringing culture onchain.

模因。時刻。文化。如果我們希望未來能成為Onchain，那麼我們必須願意在公共場合進行試驗。那就是我們正在做的。需要明確的是，基礎永遠不會出售這些代幣，並且這些代幣不是基本，共同基礎或任何其他相關產品的官方網絡令牌。我們共享的內容具有創造力，我們將繼續帶來文化。

The public on-chain experimentation brought up a discussion about memecoin culture and on-chain content, with Base's creator, Jesse Pollak, making a distinction between a contentcoin and a memecoin in a series of X posts.

公眾的鏈實驗提出了關於Memecoin文化和鍊鍊內容的討論，與Base的創作者Jesse Pollak一起在一系列X帖子中與內容套餐和成員之間做出了區別。

According to his post, a contentcoin is one piece of content with singular value and no expectations. Additionally, multiple of them can be made by the same person, with “big ones” potentially turning into memes.

根據他的帖子，內容套件是具有奇異價值且無期望的內容。此外，其中多個可以由同一人製作，而“大人物”可能會變成模因。

On the contrary, a memecoin is an “aggregation of content,” with aggregated value and high expectations, where the creator “should” only create one. He also noted that big ones turn into projects.

相反，模因是一個“內容的匯總”，具有匯總的價值和高期望，創作者“應該”僅創建一個。他還指出，大型人變成了項目。

Pollak considers that “someone has to normalize putting all of our content onchain. and i’m not afraid for it to be us. why? because in the wake of the chaos, we’ll normalize the behavior and create a better future for creators.”

Pollak認為：“有人必須正常地將我們所有的內容放置在Chain上。而且我不怕成為我們。為什麼？因為在混亂之後，我們將標準化行為並為創作者創造更好的未來。”

Despite this, many users remain skeptical, with community members also criticizing Base’s post announcing investors can mint a deleted scene of the “Vitalik: An Ethereum Story” documentary, where the project’s founder, Vitalik Buterin, shows what’s in his backpack.

儘管如此，許多用戶仍然持懷疑態度，社區成員還批評了基斯的帖子宣布投資者可以造成“ Vitalik：the Ethereum故事”紀錄片中刪除的場景，該項目的創始人Vitalik Buterin在這裡顯示了他的背包。

“Through ‘the financialization of everything’ we come to learn that most things are worthless,” the user stated.

用戶說：“通過'所有事物的財務化'，我們來了解大多數事情都是毫無價值的。”