市值: $2.6631T -1.090%
體積(24小時): $48.9251B 12.410%
  • 市值: $2.6631T -1.090%
  • 體積(24小時): $48.9251B 12.410%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $2.6631T -1.090%
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
頭號新聞
加密
主題
加密植物
資訊
加密術
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$85171.299126 USD

0.35%

ethereum
ethereum

$1612.789637 USD

1.03%

tether
tether

$0.999873 USD

0.02%

xrp
xrp

$2.084254 USD

0.12%

bnb
bnb

$592.810248 USD

0.23%

solana
solana

$141.017729 USD

2.10%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999872 USD

0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.158015 USD

-0.65%

tron
tron

$0.244474 USD

1.36%

cardano
cardano

$0.631781 USD

-0.24%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.321500 USD

1.05%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.957466 USD

1.77%

avalanche
avalanche

$19.895856 USD

3.15%

stellar
stellar

$0.246525 USD

1.41%

toncoin
toncoin

$2.976633 USD

-0.79%

加密貨幣新聞文章

基礎創建者傑西·波拉克(Jesse Pollak)為分享有爭議的藝術而道歉

2025/04/19 19:30

以太坊2層網絡基礎的創建者Jesse Pollak在面對重新攻擊數字藝術品的反彈之後,已發表了公眾道歉,許多人認為這是令人反感的。

基礎創建者傑西·波拉克(Jesse Pollak)為分享有爭議的藝術而道歉

Base creator Jesse Pollak has issued a public apology after facing backlash for sharing a piece of digital artwork that included a controversial term.

基本創作者傑西·普爾拉克(Jesse Pollak)在面對反對性的分享一件數字藝術品之後,對包括有爭議的術語進行了反對,對此表示了道歉。

The image, which played off Base’s tagline—“Base is for everyone”—featured a rotating GIF with the phrase “Base is for…” followed by a sequence of words. While some terms were neutral or benign—like “art,” “minting,” and “ideas”—others, such as “pimping” and “squirting,” sparked criticism across social media.

該圖像播放了基本的標語 - “基礎是每個人的基礎” - 用“基礎是……”短語旋轉的gif,然後是一系列單詞。儘管有些術語是中性或良性的,例如“藝術”,“造幣”和“想法”,例如“ pimping”和“ squirting”,但在社交媒體上引發了批評。

“It was a single phrase among many, but I’ll own this was a mistake and apologize,” Pollak said in an April 18 post on X.

波拉克在4月18日在X上發表的帖子中說:“這是許多人的單一短語,但我將擁有這是一個錯誤並道歉。”

The artwork, which Pollak said was created by an independent artist, displayed several benign terms like "art," "minting," "mochi," and "merpeople," interspersed with a few risqué or inappropriate words that generated criticism.

Pollak說的藝術品是由一位獨立藝術家創作的,它展示了幾種良性術語,例如“藝術”,“鑄造”,“ Mochi”和“ Merpeople”,散佈著一些引起批評的曲折或不適當的詞。

The post, which has since been deleted, concluded with Pollak stating, "This isn's about understanding how messages can be interpreted—especially when they seem to come directly from leadership."

此後已刪除的帖子以Pollak的結尾說:“這是關於了解如何解釋信息的問題,尤其是當它們似乎直接來自領導才能時。”

The incident underscores the delicate balance between creative expression and brand messaging, especially as projects like Base aim to attract a broad and diverse user base. As the crypto community continues to evolve, navigating these complexities will be crucial for maintaining inclusivity and respect.

該事件強調了創意表達與品牌消息之間的微妙平衡,尤其是當基本旨在吸引廣泛而多樣化的用戶基礎等項目時。隨著加密社區的不斷發展,導航這些複雜性對於維持包容性和尊重至關重要。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年04月20日 其他文章發表於