市值: $3.0023T -5.640%
體積(24小時): $122.313B 88.410%
  • 市值: $3.0023T -5.640%
  • 體積(24小時): $122.313B 88.410%
  • 恐懼與貪婪指數:
  • 市值: $3.0023T -5.640%
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
Top News
Cryptos
主題
Cryptospedia
資訊
CryptosTopics
影片
bitcoin
bitcoin

$95948.582879 USD

-0.40%

ethereum
ethereum

$2733.981661 USD

-2.16%

xrp
xrp

$2.499032 USD

-2.66%

tether
tether

$1.000127 USD

0.01%

bnb
bnb

$644.381094 USD

-3.18%

solana
solana

$161.557113 USD

-5.85%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999977 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.233287 USD

-4.70%

cardano
cardano

$0.747213 USD

-3.58%

tron
tron

$0.245310 USD

1.12%

chainlink
chainlink

$16.936759 USD

-5.38%

sui
sui

$3.363904 USD

-0.65%

avalanche
avalanche

$24.153930 USD

-5.68%

stellar
stellar

$0.322611 USD

-3.09%

litecoin
litecoin

$125.230744 USD

-1.45%

加密貨幣新聞文章

Badcoin(BADAI)承諾保護遭受Memecoin狙擊手的保護,但其反縫製軟件適得其反

2025/02/25 02:21

隨著Memecoin交易員在搶奪臭名昭著的實踐,各種反偷竊軟件已經廣告保障措施,以吸引買家。

Badcoin(BADAI)承諾保護遭受Memecoin狙擊手的保護,但其反縫製軟件適得其反

In the realm of memecoin trading, a new battleground has emerged, centered around the practice of "sniping." This term, borrowed from Wall Street jargon, refers to brokers who swiftly execute orders at optimal prices, akin to a concealed marksman targeting its quarry with precision.

在Memecoin貿易領域,出現了一個新的戰場,圍繞著“狙擊”的做法。這個學期是從華爾街術語借來的,是指迅速以最佳價格執行訂單的經紀人,類似於以精確性針對其採石場的隱蔽射手。

As the story goes, the term "sniping" evolved to encompass high-frequency trading firms competing in microsecond-scale endeavors to secure advantageous positions. This led to fierce battles for colocation near exchange servers, all in an attempt to exploit fiber-optic latency differentials.

隨著故事的發展,“狙擊”一詞演變為涵蓋了在微秒階段競爭以確保有利位置的高頻貿易公司。這導致了在交換服務器附近為託管的激烈戰鬥,所有這些都試圖利用光纖延遲差異。

Eventually, the term found its way into the world of crypto, repurposed to describe a different phenomenon. In the less refined markets for memecoins, people still discuss sniping in timeframes of seconds or minutes. More specifically, they refer to "snipers" as a group of sophisticated, well-capitalized traders who scour social media and token launch platforms to uncover celebrity token launches at their precise moment of creation.

最終,該術語進入了加密貨幣世界,重新描述了一種不同的現象。在不太精緻的成員市場中,人們仍在討論幾秒鐘或幾分鐘的時間範圍內的狙擊。更具體地說,他們將“狙擊手”稱為一群精緻的,資本良好的交易者,他們搜尋社交媒體和代幣發射平台,以在其精確的創建時刻揭示名人代幣的發射。

These memecoin snipers quickly locate the contract address and purchase as much of the token as possible, with the intention of selling it a few seconds or minutes later to less savvy buyers who learn about the launch through social media posts slowly disseminating the news.

這些成人狙擊手迅速找到合同地址併購買盡可能多的代幣,目的是將其出售幾秒鐘或幾分鐘後,向不太精通的買家出售,他們通過社交媒體帖子逐漸慢慢傳播了這一消息。

Founder Mike Sarvodaya's BadCoin community sought to evade the front-running snipers of Solana memecoins. Their strategy involved launching on a distinct blockchain by Binance and leaving behind the scam-ridden Pump.fun.

創始人邁克·薩沃達亞(Mike Sarvodaya)的壞幣社區試圖逃避Solana Memecoins的領先狙擊手。他們的策略涉及通過Binance在獨特的區塊鏈上啟動,並留下騙子纏繞的泵。

However, neither of these tactics salvaged the outcome. The memecoin's price on Gra.fun soared rapidly, reaching an all-time high within five minutes, followed by a consistent decline. Later, when the token shifted from Gra.fun to the on-chain exchange Pancakeswap, its price similarly spiked to an all-time high within five minutes and crashed thereafter. A dual listing on Gate.io also saw the token reach its all-time high approximately five minutes after launch, before crashing for hours.

但是,這些策略都沒有挽救結果。 Memecoin在Gra.fun上的價格迅速飆升,在五分鐘內達到了歷史最高水平,隨後持續下降。後來,當代幣從Gra.Fun轉移到鏈上的交換煎餅Wap時,其價格類似地飆升至五分鐘內的歷史高度,此後墜毀。 Gate.io上的雙重列表還看到,該令牌在發射後大約五分鐘後達到了其歷史最高,然後墜毀了幾個小時。

BNB Chain itself highlighted the token's launch with a tweet. Gra.fun also earned a dedicatedBNB Chain tweet. BNB Chain acknowledged tweeting BADAI's token generation event but denied having any commercial or investment relationships with the coin.

BNB鏈本身通過推文強調了令牌的發布。 Gra.Fun還獲得了一條專用的鏈條推文。 BNB連鎖店承認發推文Badai的代幣一代活動,但否認與硬幣有任何商業或投資關係。

It went on to implore Gra.fun and BadCoin to address its shortcomings.

它繼續懇求Gra.Fun和Badcoin解決其缺點。

Gra.fun, in an X post, conceded its own failures, revealing that an integration issue with its protection filters blocked legitimate sellers. The filters operated on two liquidity pools and somehow blacklisted each other. As a result, some users who interacted with the associated pools encountered blacklisting.

Gra.Fun在X帖子中承認自己的失敗,表明與其保護過濾器的集成問題阻止了合法賣家。過濾器在兩個流動性池上運行,並以某種方式互相黑名單。結果,一些與關聯池進行互動的用戶遇到了黑名單。

Gra.fun's team is now manually investigating each address affected by this issue.

Gra.Fun的團隊現在正在手動調查受此問題影響的每個地址。

Protos has attempted to contact Bad AI for comment but did not receive an immediate response. We will keep you updated as more information becomes available.

Protos試圖與Bad AI聯繫以進行評論,但沒有立即得到回應。隨著更多信息可用,我們將為您提供最新信息。

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2025年02月25日 其他文章發表於