![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Cryptocurrency News Articles
YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs), Continue Capital, IOSG Ventures, Bain Capital Have the Best Vision and ROI in Web3
Mar 02, 2025 at 12:00 pm
After 48 hours of intense organization, a must-see data collection for Web3 players. Among so many VCs in Web3,
Author: Sege (@EvanCrypto17)
After 48 hours of intense organization, a must-see data collection for Web3 players.
Among so many VCs in Web3,
Which VCs have the best vision?
Which VCs have the highest return on investment for their projects?
Which VCs offer better cost-effectiveness for ordinary players to invest early?
Which projects should we focus on?
What are the domestic and foreign VCs?
Do foreign VCs invest in projects with greater potential?
These questions are of utmost concern to retail investors and are what primary market players (those looking for quick profits) want to focus on.
In this article, we will let the data speak for itself and reveal the answers to these questions one by one.
All data is sourced from publicly available information. We have filtered a total of 65 VCs, including 23 foreign VCs, 34 domestic VCs, and 8 exchange-affiliated VCs.
The best result for VC investment is when a token is listed on a major exchange.
Although we know that some projects can be very profitable without issuing tokens, this is not a game that ordinary players can participate in.
Therefore, we provide the following dimensions for judgment:
Quantity:
Total investment count by VC - Number of projects that issued tokens - Number of projects listed on Binance - Number of projects listed on OKX - Number of projects listed on Coinbase
Listing Success Rate:
Project listing rate on Binance = Number listed on Binance / Total investment count - Project listing rate on OKX = Number listed on OKX / Total investment count - Project listing rate on Coinbase = Number listed on Coinbase / Total investment count
Judgment Criteria:
Comprehensive Score = 2 * Binance listing rate + 1 * OKX listing rate + 1 * Coinbase listing rate
Binance has the largest volume, so its weight is 2.
Average Return on Investment (ROI) = 15 * Binance listing rate + 10 * OKX listing rate + 10 * Coinbase listing rate
The ROI assumes an average profit of 15 times for early investments listed on Binance, 10 times for OKX, and 10 times for Coinbase. Each project varies, and here we take the average.
Conclusion First
Based on the differences in comprehensive scores, we categorize VCs into five levels: T0, T1, T2, T3, T4. The higher the rank, the better the vision of the VC, making it more cost-effective for us to invest our efforts in the primary market alongside these VCs.
VC Levels:
T0 level VCs include YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs), Continue Capital, IOSG Ventures, Bain Capital.
T1 level VCs include Multicoin, Pantera, 1Confirmation, Smrti Lab, Zonff Partners.
T2 level VCs include Polychain, ParaFi Capital, Dragonfly, Sequoia China, Delphi Digital, Electric Capital, Mint Ventures, CoinFund.
T3 level VCs include Framework Ventures, NGC Ventures, SNZ Holding, Coinbase Ventures, OKX Ventures, etc.
T4 level VCs include Animoca Brands, GSR, Hashkey Capital, Waterdrip, LD Capital, etc.
Regional VC Investment Output and Return Ranking:
Foreign VCs > Exchange-affiliated VCs > Domestic VCs
T0 Level VCs
T0 level VCs include YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs), Continue Capital, IOSG Ventures, Bain Capital.
Comprehensive score > 1, average ROI between 8 - 12. By investing our efforts in the projects these VCs invested in early, we can generally achieve significant results, with a high probability of making substantial profits.
Detailed data is shown in the figure.
T1 Level VCs
T1 level VCs include Multicoin, Pantera, 1Confirmation, Smrti Lab, Zonff Partners.
Comprehensive score between 0.7 - 1, average ROI between 6 - 7.5. Investing our efforts in the projects these VCs invested in early also yields good returns, with A6.5 being a very good result.
Detailed data is shown in the figure.
T2 Level VCs
T2 level VCs include Polychain, ParaFi Capital, Dragonfly, Sequoia China, Delphi Digital, Electric Capital, Mint Ventures, CoinFund.
Comprehensive score between 0.5 - 0.7, average ROI between 4 - 6. Investing our efforts in the projects these VCs invested in early may yield somewhat unstable returns, but it's worth a try for potential opportunities.
Detailed data is shown in the figure.
T3 Level VCs
T3 level VCs include Framework Ventures, NGC Ventures, SNZ Holding, Coinbase Ventures, OKX Ventures, etc.
Comprehensive score between 0
Disclaimer:info@kdj.com
The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!
If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Bitcoin hashrate is surging, revealing a growing dislocation between the network activity and prices for its native token bitcoin (BTC).
- Apr 05, 2025 at 03:55 am
- Bitcoin blockchain's hashrate is surging, revealing a growing dislocation between the network activity and prices for its native token bitcoin (BTC).
-
-
-