Market Cap: $2.6669T -1.190%
Volume(24h): $129.9898B 62.650%
  • Market Cap: $2.6669T -1.190%
  • Volume(24h): $129.9898B 62.650%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.6669T -1.190%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$83571.608249 USD

-1.38%

ethereum
ethereum

$1826.028236 USD

-3.02%

tether
tether

$0.999839 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.053149 USD

-2.48%

bnb
bnb

$601.140115 USD

-0.44%

solana
solana

$120.357332 USD

-3.79%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999833 USD

-0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.166175 USD

-3.43%

cardano
cardano

$0.652521 USD

-3.00%

tron
tron

$0.236809 USD

-0.59%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.785339 USD

-5.02%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.253231 USD

-3.91%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.397427 USD

-0.19%

stellar
stellar

$0.266444 USD

-1.00%

sui
sui

$2.409007 USD

1.15%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Identifying the Client Associated with a Legal Document

Nov 19, 2024 at 05:02 am

The main objective was to identify the client(s) associated with each document through one of the following identifiers:

Identifying the Client Associated with a Legal Document

The goal was to extract client names from legal documents using Named Entity Recognition (NER). Here's how I approached the task:

Data: I had a collection of legal documents in PDF format. The task was to identify the clients mentioned in each document using one of the following identifiers:

Approximate client name (e.g., "John Doe")

Precise client name (e.e., "Doe, John A.")

Approximate firm name (e.g., "Doe Law Firm")

Precise firm name (e.g., "Doe, John A. Law Firm")

About 5% of the documents didn't include any identifying entities.

Dataset: For developing the model, I used 710 "true" PDF documents, which were split into three sets: 600 for training, 55 for validation, and 55 for testing.

Labels: I was given an Excel file with entities extracted as plain text, which needed to be manually labeled in the document text. Using the BIO tagging format, I performed the following steps:

Mark the beginning of an entity with "B-".

Continue marking subsequent tokens within the same entity with "I-".

If a token doesn't belong to any entity, mark it as "O".

Alternative Approach: Models like LayoutLM, which also consider bounding boxes for input tokens, could potentially enhance the performance of the NER task. However, I opted not to use this approach because, as is often the case, I had already spent the majority of the project time on preparing the data (e.g., reformatting Excel files, correcting data errors, labeling). To integrate bounding box-based models, I would have needed to allocate even more time.

While regex and heuristics could theoretically be applied to identify these simple entities, I anticipated that this approach would be impractical, as it would necessitate overly complex rules to precisely identify the correct entities among other potential candidates (e.g., lawyer name, case number, other participants in the proceedings). In contrast, the model is capable of learning to distinguish the relevant entities, rendering the use of heuristics superfluous.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Apr 03, 2025