Market Cap: $2.7512T 2.740%
Volume(24h): $76.843B -16.070%
  • Market Cap: $2.7512T 2.740%
  • Volume(24h): $76.843B -16.070%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.7512T 2.740%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$82833.083289 USD

-0.64%

ethereum
ethereum

$1895.772539 USD

0.28%

tether
tether

$0.999901 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.318667 USD

2.23%

bnb
bnb

$580.792401 USD

0.44%

solana
solana

$125.858295 USD

-0.69%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999913 USD

-0.02%

cardano
cardano

$0.722211 USD

-0.37%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.169527 USD

-1.07%

tron
tron

$0.221501 USD

-1.36%

pi
pi

$1.578559 USD

-7.83%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.783397 USD

0.76%

chainlink
chainlink

$14.039280 USD

5.24%

stellar
stellar

$0.282425 USD

3.40%

hedera
hedera

$0.192278 USD

-2.56%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Why was the Ethereum Pectra activation schedule delayed?

Mar 14, 2025 at 09:48 am

Sepolia and Holesky Ethereum testnets experienced significant setbacks during Pectra upgrade testing due to configuration errors, delaying the mainnet launch and highlighting the complexities of large-scale ecosystem coordination.

Why was the Ethereum Pectra activation schedule delayed?

Test network vulnerabilities frequently occur

Test networks play a crucial role in the upgrade process of Ethereum. However, the two major test networks, Holesky and Sepolia, have been in constant condition recently. When testing the Pectra upgrade, the Sepolia network seemed to be going well in the early stages, but an error began to occur a few hours later, resulting in empty blocks being added to the chain. The Ethereum Foundation blamed this problem on "Sepolia's licensed deposit contract configuration error", which prevented many execution layer clients from including transactions in the block, seriously affecting the normal progress of the test.

Chain reactions caused by vulnerabilities

The Sepolia test network's licensed deposit contract issues are not isolated incidents. After the problem arose, the client team quickly identified the cause and started to fix it, but it had an impact on the test progress. The Sepolia network only returns to normal throughput after the validator deploys the fix. However, this tossing has forced all Sepolia node operators to upgrade execution layer clients to maintain network compatibility, which undoubtedly increases the difficulty of time costs and technical coordination, further delaying the overall process of Pectra upgrade.

Holesky Network Dilemma

Holesky Network was also not spared. In the test of Pectra upgrade, we also encountered vulnerabilities caused by configuration errors. Due to unstable testing, developers have to create a "shadow fork" for the Holesky testnet. This move is designed to allow key stakeholders, such as staking pools and DApp developers to continue testing their code before Pectra is officially launched. However, the Holesky network is expected to resume normal operation until March 28, during which time, it is unable to provide full efforts to provide a stable testing environment for Pectra upgrades, seriously hindering the speed of the upgrade.

Inadequate ecological preparation

In addition to the technical issues of the test network itself, the preparation of the Ethereum ecosystem has also impacted the Pectra activation timeline. During the testing of Pectra upgrade, the support and adaptation levels of upgrades by relevant ecological projects and applications are uneven. Some DApps and L2 are not fully prepared to support some key features in Pectra upgrades, such as account abstraction. This makes it impossible to fully and effectively verify the feasibility and stability of the upgrade in actual application scenarios during the testing process, which in turn causes developers to need more time to coordinate all parties in the ecosystem and improve relevant preparations.

Complex technical integration challenges

The Pectra upgrade includes several important technological improvements, such as reducing data availability costs by increasing the number of “blob” transactions on the Layer 2 network, significantly increasing staking restrictions, and introducing account abstractions. These technological improvements are interrelated and face many challenges in the integration process. Different technical modules need to be fully run-in and debugged in the test network to ensure that they can work together and operate stably after the main network is activated. However, judging from the current situation, various problems exposed in the test network show that the difficulty of technology integration is beyond expectations, which is also an important factor in the delay of the activation schedule.

Community feedback and adjustments

The Ethereum community pays great attention to Pectra upgrades. Developers need to fully consider community feedback when promoting the upgrade. The problems that arose during the testing process caused dissatisfaction among some members of the community, who criticized the Ethereum Foundation for failing to formulate a clear development route. Faced with these feedbacks, developers need to weigh the opinions of all parties and make necessary adjustments and optimizations to the upgrade plan. This process takes time to coordinate and make decisions, and to some extent it has led to the delay of the Pectra activation schedule.

Preparation for a new test network

Given the current status of the Holesky and Sepolia test networks, Ethereum Foundation developers have decided to launch a new test network, Hoodi. Hoodi will be used to test the final Pectra deployment before mainnet activation. However, the preparation of the new test network itself also takes time, and every link cannot be neglected from planning, construction to debugging. Until Hoodi is officially launched and can effectively support Pectra upgrade testing, mainnet activation can only wait, which further extends the timeline for Pectra upgrades.

The complexity of multi-party coordination

The Pectra upgrade involves many participants in the Ethereum ecosystem, including developers, validators, node operators, DApp developers, staking pools, etc. All parties have their own tasks and needs during the upgrade process, and they need to be closely coordinated and cooperated. However, in actual operation, coordination work becomes extremely complicated due to differences in the interests and technical capabilities of each party. For example, when solving test network problems, different parties may have differences in the formulation and implementation of repair plans, which requires a lot of time to communicate and negotiate, resulting in the delay of the Pectra activation schedule.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Mar 15, 2025