Market Cap: $2.7427T 1.680%
Volume(24h): $59.157B 27.410%
  • Market Cap: $2.7427T 1.680%
  • Volume(24h): $59.157B 27.410%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.7427T 1.680%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$87482.320980 USD

2.70%

ethereum
ethereum

$1639.431254 USD

1.64%

tether
tether

$0.999987 USD

0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.117064 USD

1.57%

bnb
bnb

$601.133644 USD

1.42%

solana
solana

$139.733645 USD

-0.82%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999933 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.160935 USD

1.88%

tron
tron

$0.244600 USD

0.10%

cardano
cardano

$0.637815 USD

0.99%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.550889 USD

4.61%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.381196 USD

0.66%

avalanche
avalanche

$20.027783 USD

0.74%

stellar
stellar

$0.250510 USD

1.63%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.017232 USD

1.39%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Congressman Nick Begich (R-AK) Is Gaining Momentum with His Support for The Bitcoin Act

Mar 19, 2025 at 07:19 am

Congressman Nick Begich (R-AK) is gaining momentum with his support for The Bitcoin Act, a sweeping legislative effort to make Bitcoin an essential strategic asset for the United States.

Congressman Nick Begich (R-AK) Is Gaining Momentum with His Support for The Bitcoin Act

Congressman Nick Begich (R-AK) is garnering support for The Bitcoin Act, a bipartisan bill aiming to make Bitcoin an essential strategic asset for the United States.

The legislation, which mandates a blueprint for the US Treasury to purchase 1 million BTC over the next five years, has been co-sponsored by several members of Congress, including Rep. Pat Harrigan (RNC), Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX), and Rep. Michael Rulli (R-OH), who understand Bitcoin’s promise to provide better national financial security. Sen. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), one of the longest-standing Bitcoin proponents, has introduced companion legislation in the upper chamber, adding to what is looking to be some momentum for the bill.

The bill has also received interest in the industry and beyond from proponents of digital assets and other political leaders. Bitcoin Policy Institute and other commentators have complimented the bill, stating it is part of a broader trend to update the financial infrastructure and utilize fewer fiat reserves.

Public interest in the Bitcoin Act is also growing, with the Bitcoin community and financial pundits invoking the law’s ability to act as an inflation hedge and protector against economic volatility. Social media has also embraced the bill significantly, with community groups championing the idea.

The legislation suggests a framework for potentially accumulating 1 million BTC over five years, with purchases of 200,000 BTC per year. However, all of these acquisitions are required under the bill to be made through budget-neutral mechanisms, namely Federal Reserve remittances and gold certificate revaluations, thereby keeping taxpayer burdens to an absolute minimum.

The bill also asserts BTC self-custody rights, ensuring that federal agents do not hinder individuals’ ability to own and transact with Bitcoin. This has attracted the attention of both libertarian-leaning policymakers and advocates of financial freedom.

The U.S. is advancing its financial leadership in digital assets

The Bitcoin Act follows the President’s recent executive order calling for establishing a “Strategic Bitcoin Reserve,” indicative of the administration’s commitment to fully harnessing the future of digital assets. If successful, the bill would enshrine BTC’s position in national financial strategy, providing a template for other countries to follow.

As Congressman Begich drifts between supporters, policymakers, financial institutions and global markets will watch and listen closely to the bill’s progression. As adoption continues, the Bitcoin Act would radically shift how the U.S. government relates to BTC and the broader digital economy.

Congressman Nick Begich said that the United States’ proof of reserves system, as defined in the bill, would be comparable to the one the Central American country uses, whereby the government’s BTC address is published.

He said one of the enduring problems around Fort Knox was that there was no public auditing to back it up, which led to concerns over the gold content. Some commentators assumed the U.S. held less gold than it said; others that it held more. Begich pointed out that there was no way American citizens could independently verify the existence of the gold we were being told the country had.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Apr 21, 2025