Uniswap 成为过去 7 天内 DeFi 费用收取的领先者

在去中心化金融（DeFi）协议的最新数据中，Uniswap 在过去 7 天内收取的平均费用方面已成为领先者。

Uniswap Leads DeFi Protocols in 7D Average Fees with $2.3M Blockworks Pro Charting the latest data on decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, Uniswap has emerged as the leader in terms of average fees collected over the past seven days. According to recent figures, Uniswap generated a staggering $2.3 million in fees, solidifying its position as the top-performing DeFi project in this metric. This significant lead underscores Uniswap’s dominance and the growing user adoption of its decentralized exchange platform.

Uniswap 以 230 万美元的 7D 平均费用领先 DeFi 协议 Blockworks Pro 绘制了去中心化金融 (DeFi) 协议的最新数据，就过去 7 天收取的平均费用而言，Uniswap 已成为领先者。根据最新数据，Uniswap 产生了惊人的 230 万美元费用，巩固了其作为该指标中表现最佳的 DeFi 项目的地位。这一显着的领先优势凸显了 Uniswap 的主导地位以及其去中心化交易平台的用户采用率不断增长。

TOP 10 PROJECTS BY 7D AVG. FEES

7D AVG 排名前 10 的项目费用

#Uniswap – $2.3M

#Uniswap – 230 万美元

#Aave – $1.0M

#Aave – 100 万美元

#KyberNetwork – $297.3K

#KyberNetwork – 297.3K 美元

#MakerDAO – $262.0K

#MakerDAO – 26.2 万美元

#Sushi – $51.5K

#寿司 – 51,500 美元

#Curve – $47.0K

#Curve – 47.0K 美元

#GMX – $38.5K

#GMX – 38.5 万美元

#Synthetix – $19.2K

#Synthetix – $19.2K

#Spookyswap – $18.8K

#Spookyswap – $18.8K

#TraderJoe – $14.0K

#TraderJoe – $14.0K

Following Uniswap, Aave has also demonstrated strong performance, collecting $1.0 million in average fees over the same period. As one of the leading lending protocols in the DeFi space, Aave’s ability to generate substantial fees reflects its importance in the ecosystem, particularly as users continue to leverage its lending and borrowing capabilities.

继 Uniswap 之后，Aave 也表现出了强劲的表现，同期平均收取 100 万美元的费用。作为 DeFi 领域领先的借贷协议之一，Aave 产生大量费用的能力反映了其在生态系统中的重要性，特别是当用户继续利用其借贷功能时。

KyberNetwork, another prominent player in the DeFi sector, secured the third spot with $297.3K in average fees. This highlights the continued relevance of liquidity aggregation and on-chain transactions within the decentralized landscape.

KyberNetwork 是 DeFi 领域的另一家知名企业，以 29.73 万美元的平均费用位居第三。这凸显了去中心化环境中流动性聚合和链上交易的持续相关性。

MakerDAO and Sushi Show Resilience

MakerDAO 和 Sushi 展现出韧性

MakerDAO, a key protocol in the stablecoin and lending space, recorded $262.0K in fees, placing it in fourth position. Despite the fluctuating market conditions, MakerDAO’s fee generation demonstrates the protocol’s resilience and its integral role in DeFi.

MakerDAO 是稳定币和借贷领域的关键协议，其费用为 26.2 万美元，排名第四。尽管市场状况波动，MakerDAO 的费用产生证明了该协议的弹性及其在 DeFi 中不可或缺的作用。

Sushi, another decentralized exchange, follows with $51.5K in average fees. Although it trails behind Uniswap, Sushi’s continued presence in the top 10 projects by fees indicates its sustained user engagement and utility.

另一家去中心化交易所 Sushi 的平均费用为 5.15 万美元。尽管落后于 Uniswap，但 Sushi 继续跻身费用排名前 10 的项目，这表明其持续的用户参与度和效用。

Further details from the stats show that Curve, known for its efficient stablecoin swaps, generated $47.0K in fees, ranking it sixth. The protocol’s focus on providing low-slippage trades for stablecoins has kept it relevant in the competitive DeFi market.

统计数据的更多细节显示，以高效的稳定币互换而闻名的 Curve 产生了 4.7 万美元的费用，排名第六。该协议专注于为稳定币提供低滑点交易，使其在竞争激烈的 DeFi 市场中保持重要地位。

GMX, a decentralized perpetual exchange, garnered $38.5K in fees, reflecting the growing interest in decentralized derivatives trading. Its inclusion in the top 10 is a testament to the rising demand for perpetual contracts and leveraged trading.

GMX 是一家去中心化永续交易所，收取了 3.85 万美元的费用，反映出人们对去中心化衍生品交易的兴趣日益浓厚。其跻身前十证明了永续合约和杠杆交易的需求不断增长。

Synthetix, Spookyswap, and TraderJoe complete the list, with average fees of $19.2K, $18.8K, and $14.0K, respectively. These figures highlight the diverse range of DeFi protocols that continue to attract users and generate revenue despite varying market conditions.

Synthetix、Spookyswap 和 TraderJoe 紧随其后，平均费用分别为 19200 美元、18800 美元和 14000 美元。这些数字突显了 DeFi 协议的多样性，尽管市场条件各异，但它们仍继续吸引用户并产生收入。