|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ripple 与美国证券交易委员会(SEC)之间正在进行的法律战再次升温。
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is reportedly preparing to appeal a summary judgment made by Judge Analisa Torres in the ongoing lawsuit against Ripple Labs, legal sources have told Law360.
据法律消息人士告诉 Law360,美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 正准备对法官 Analisa Torres 在针对 Ripple Labs 的持续诉讼中做出的简易判决提出上诉。
The SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020, alleging that the company had raised over $1.3 billion through an unregistered offering of XRP tokens. Judge Torres granted summary judgment to Ripple in December 2022, ruling that the SEC had failed to show that XRP is a security.
美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 于 2020 年 12 月对 Ripple 提起诉讼,指控该公司通过未经注册的 XRP 代币发行筹集了超过 13 亿美元资金。托雷斯法官于 2022 年 12 月对 Ripple 作出简易判决,裁定 SEC 未能证明 XRP 是一种证券。
The SEC's decision to appeal the summary judgment is not surprising, given the high stakes involved in the case. If the SEC is successful in overturning the summary judgment, it could have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency industry.
鉴于该案涉及的高风险,美国证券交易委员会决定对简易判决提出上诉并不令人意外。如果 SEC 成功推翻简易判决,可能会对加密货币行业产生重大影响。
However, legal experts are divided on the SEC's chances of success. Some argue that the Second Circuit is likely to uphold Judge Torres' ruling, while others believe that the SEC has a strong case.
然而,法律专家对于 SEC 的成功机会存在分歧。一些人认为第二巡回法院可能会维持托雷斯法官的裁决,而另一些人则认为美国证券交易委员会有充分的理由。
John Deaton, an attorney who represents 75,000 XRP holders in the case, told Law360 that he believes the SEC is dissatisfied with the court's decision regarding XRP sales.
在此案中代表 75,000 名 XRP 持有者的律师约翰·迪顿 (John Deaton) 告诉 Law360,他认为 SEC 对法院有关 XRP 销售的决定不满意。
"The court found that the SEC failed to show that buyers had any contact with Ripple's promotional materials or saw XRP as an investment opportunity tied to Ripple," Deaton said. "Since buyers didn't know who they were buying from, it made the SEC's burden of proof even bigger, especially since key expert testimony was excluded."
Deaton 表示:“法院发现 SEC 未能证明买家与 Ripple 的宣传材料有任何接触,或将 XRP 视为与 Ripple 相关的投资机会。” “由于买家不知道他们从谁那里购买,这使得美国证券交易委员会的举证责任更大,特别是因为关键的专家证词被排除在外。”
Deaton added that many people have asked him if XRP insiders know whether the SEC will appeal the lawsuit.
Deaton 补充说,很多人问他 XRP 内部人士是否知道 SEC 是否会对诉讼提起上诉。
"I get asked this question a lot, but the answer is no," Deaton said. "When asked if the SEC needs to vote on the decision to appeal, Marc [Fagel], a former SEC lawyer, explained, 'I believe they do. Which helps explain why it's taking so long; that's never a quick process.'"
“我经常被问到这个问题,但答案是否定的,”迪顿说。 “当被问及美国证券交易委员会是否需要对上诉决定进行投票时,美国证券交易委员会前律师马克(法格尔)解释说,‘我相信他们需要。这有助于解释为什么需要这么长时间;这从来都不是一个快速的过程。’”
One user asked Marc how the SEC could argue that Judge Torres' ruling was wrong when the SEC failed to prove that buyers had any contact with Ripple's promotional materials or saw XRP as an investment opportunity tied to Ripple. The user pointed out that since buyers didn't know who they were buying from, it made the SEC's burden of proof even bigger, especially since key expert testimony was excluded.
一位用户询问 Marc,当 SEC 未能证明买家与 Ripple 的宣传材料有任何接触或将 XRP 视为与 Ripple 相关的投资机会时,SEC 如何辩称托雷斯法官的裁决是错误的。该用户指出,由于买家不知道他们从谁那里购买,这使得美国证券交易委员会的举证责任更大,特别是因为关键的专家证词被排除在外。
Marc agreed, saying that the court's logic suggests a reasonable investor wouldn't care about Ripple's involvement, which undermines the case.
马克对此表示同意,并表示法院的逻辑表明,理性的投资者不会关心 Ripple 的参与,这会破坏此案。
"Under the court's logic, a reasonable investor should not care at all, because a reasonable investor doesn't know that XRP's value has anything to do with Ripple," Marc wrote. "(Or, less kindly, the court seems to think crypto investors are dumb.)"
Marc 写道:“根据法院的逻辑,一个理性的投资者根本不应该关心,因为一个理性的投资者不知道 XRP 的价值与 Ripple 有任何关系。” “(或者,更不客气的是,法院似乎认为加密货币投资者很愚蠢。)”
He added that the decision goes against the intent of the 1933 Securities Act, as it implies companies could avoid registration by selling through third parties.
他补充说,这一决定违背了 1933 年《证券法》的意图,因为这意味着公司可以通过第三方销售来避免注册。
"Finally, the court's decision seems to protect institutional investors while leaving retail investors without safeguards—a contradiction I expect the Second Circuit to consider," Marc said.
“最后,法院的判决似乎保护了机构投资者,同时让散户投资者失去了保障——我希望第二巡回法院能够考虑这一矛盾,”马克说。
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
- 第四季度有可能出现价格大幅上涨的顶级山寨币
- 2024-09-29 20:25:02
- 随着跨境市场看涨情绪的增加,加密货币领域即将迎来 9 月份的积极局面。
-
- OpenSea 2024 年 9 月交易量名列前茅
- 2024-09-29 20:25:02
- 尽管受到美国证券交易委员会的严格审查,OpenSea 这个不可替代的代币市场允许用户购买
-
- 五头牛因饮用米戈里一家采矿公司的有毒废水而死亡
- 2024-09-29 20:20:22
- 矿业和蓝色经济内阁秘书哈桑·乔霍已批准对尼亚蒂克牲畜死亡事件进行彻底调查
-
- 美元统治的终结?
- 2024-09-29 20:20:22
- 美元曾经是经济实力的象征,如今却显示出令人担忧的下跌迹象。面对金砖国家的崛起