MetaMask 联合创始人 Dan Finlay 对 Memecoin 的实验凸显了关于共识及其投机性质的争论

MetaMask 联合创始人 Dan Finlay 对 memecoin 进行了一项实验，引发了关于 Web3 和 AI 同意的争论。这就是出现的情况。

MetaMask co-founder Dan Finlay conducted an experiment with memecoins that highlighted debates on consensus and speculation.

MetaMask 联合创始人丹·芬利 (Dan Finlay) 进行了一项模因币实验，强调了关于共识和猜测的争论。

The experiment involved minting two tokens, “Consent” on Ethereum and “I Don’t Consent” on Solana, and observing the reactions and participation.

该实验涉及铸造两种代币，即以太坊上的“同意”和 Solana 上的“我不同意”，并观察反应和参与情况。

Finlay aimed to explore the boundaries of consent, trust, and responsibility in the web3 domain, particularly in the realm of memecoins and decentralized decision-making.

Finlay 旨在探索 web3 领域中同意、信任和责任的界限，特别是在模因币和去中心化决策领域。

Participants were enthusiastic about the tokens, with the value briefly exceeding $100,000 for “Consent.” However, this positioned participants for potential financial losses.

参与者对这些代币热情高涨，“同意”的价值一度超过 10 万美元。然而，这使参与者面临潜在的经济损失。

The experiment sparked discussion on the speculative nature of memecoins and the risks involved for participants who may not fully grasp the nature of the assets they're purchasing.

该实验引发了关于模因币的投机性质以及可能无法完全掌握所购买资产性质的参与者所涉及的风险的讨论。

Finlay encountered backlash from investors, including threats and inquiries about long-term plans for the assets, despite their simplistic design and lack of intrinsic value.

芬利遭到了投资者的强烈反对，包括对资产长期计划的威胁和询问，尽管这些资产的设计过于简单且缺乏内在价值。

“The only act of consent that seems unequivocal in this memecoin environment is that buyers are definitely agreeing to put their money into something. But without this thing being well defined, what kind of consent is it?”, Finlay noted.

“在这种模因币环境中，唯一看似明确的同意行为是买家肯定同意将钱投入某物。但如果没有明确定义这件事，那它是什么样的同意呢？”芬利指出。

While the experiment highlighted the consensus aspect of memecoins, it also brought to light their speculative nature, making meme cryptos inherently risky.

虽然该实验强调了模因币的共识方面，但它也暴露了它们的投机性质，使模因加密货币具有固有的风险。

Finlay personally experienced how crypto liquidity is often tied to speculation, which isn't always beneficial. Memecoins thrive on extreme volatility, often influenced by social media trends rather than utility or value.

芬利亲身经历了加密货币流动性如何常常与投机联系在一起，而投机并不总是有益的。 Memecoin 在极端波动性下蓬勃发展，通常受到社交媒体趋势而非效用或价值的影响。

The speculative aspect makes memecoins susceptible to market manipulation, such as pump-and-dump schemes, where investors risk losing if prices crash after the hype fades.

投机性使得模因币容易受到市场操纵的影响，例如拉高抛售计划，如果炒作消退后价格暴跌，投资者就有遭受损失的风险。

Finlay's experiment and observations underscored the need for clear systems of consent, trust, and responsibility, considering the blurring lines between public visibility, user expectations, and collective decision-making.

考虑到公众知名度、用户期望和集体决策之间的模糊界限，芬利的实验和观察强调了建立明确的同意、信任和责任体系的必要性。

In his experiment, Finlay also drew parallels between memecoin consensus and consent in digital platforms integrating AI, such as Bluesky.

在他的实验中，芬利还将 memecoin 共识与集成人工智能的数字平台（例如 Bluesky）中的同意进行了比较。

Finlay noted how Bluensky utilized a public post data set for AI training without explicit user consent, highlighting a disconnect between the protocol's and society's consensus expectations.

Finlay 指出 Bluensky 如何在未经用户明确同意的情况下利用公共发布数据集进行人工智能训练，这凸显了该协议与社会共识期望之间的脱节。

Recently, the memecoins sector was analyzed precisely because they too are riding the bullish wave following Donald Trump's victory in the USA 2024 presidential elections.

最近，模因币行业受到了分析，因为在唐纳德·特朗普 (Donald Trump) 赢得 2024 年美国总统大选后，模因币行业也迎来了看涨浪潮。

First of all, the memecoins of the moment were analyzed, with an exception for Dogecoin (DOGE), which is the meme crypto par excellence. And then Bonk emerged, the meme crypto on Solana, and PEPE.

首先，分析了当前的模因币，但狗狗币（DOGE）除外，它是卓越的模因加密货币。然后 Bonk 出现了，Solana 上的 meme 加密货币和 PEPE。

In any case, it was also noted here the high attention that must be paid to these crypto which are simply the representation of high-risk speculations. In fact, often their market performances are due to real pump&dump schemes that always end in a crash.

无论如何，这里还指出必须高度关注这些加密货币，它们只是高风险投机的代表。事实上，它们的市场表现往往是由于真正的拉高抛售计划而导致的，而这些计划总是以崩盘告终。

These schemes create real speculative bubbles around these simple assets, which are fundamentally based on nothing useful. When the bubble then bursts, the harsh truth arrives, which is why investors can no longer remain unaware of this high risk of their investments.

这些计划围绕这些简单的资产创造了真正的投机泡沫，而这些资产基本上没有什么用处。当泡沫破裂时，严酷的事实就会到来，这就是为什么投资者不能再对投资的高风险视而不见。