Uniswap 成為過去 7 天內 DeFi 費用收取的領導者

在去中心化金融（DeFi）協議的最新數據中，Uniswap 在過去 7 天內收取的平均費用方面已成為領導者。

Uniswap Leads DeFi Protocols in 7D Average Fees with $2.3M Blockworks Pro Charting the latest data on decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, Uniswap has emerged as the leader in terms of average fees collected over the past seven days. According to recent figures, Uniswap generated a staggering $2.3 million in fees, solidifying its position as the top-performing DeFi project in this metric. This significant lead underscores Uniswap’s dominance and the growing user adoption of its decentralized exchange platform.

Uniswap 以 230 萬美元的 7D 平均費用領先 DeFi 協議 Blockworks Pro 繪製了去中心化金融 (DeFi) 協議的最新數據，就過去 7 天收取的平均費用而言，Uniswap 已成為領先者。根據最新數據，Uniswap 產生了驚人的 230 萬美元費用，鞏固了其作為該指標中表現最佳的 DeFi 專案的地位。這一顯著的領先優勢凸顯了 Uniswap 的主導地位以及其去中心化交易平台的用戶採用率不斷增長。

TOP 10 PROJECTS BY 7D AVG. FEES

7D AVG 排名前 10 名的項目費用

#Uniswap – $2.3M

#Uniswap – 230 萬美元

#Aave – $1.0M

#Aave – 100 萬美元

#KyberNetwork – $297.3K

#KyberNetwork – 297.3K 美元

#MakerDAO – $262.0K

#MakerDAO – 26.2 萬美元

#Sushi – $51.5K

#壽司 – 51,500 美元

#Curve – $47.0K

#Curve – 47.0K 美元

#GMX – $38.5K

#GMX – 38.5 萬美元

#Synthetix – $19.2K

#Synthetix – $19.2K

#Spookyswap – $18.8K

#Spookyswap – $18.8K

#TraderJoe – $14.0K

#TraderJoe – $14.0K

Following Uniswap, Aave has also demonstrated strong performance, collecting $1.0 million in average fees over the same period. As one of the leading lending protocols in the DeFi space, Aave’s ability to generate substantial fees reflects its importance in the ecosystem, particularly as users continue to leverage its lending and borrowing capabilities.

繼 Uniswap 之後，Aave 也表現出了強勁的表現，同期平均收取 100 萬美元的費用。作為 DeFi 領域領先的借貸協議之一，Aave 產生大量費用的能力反映了其在生態系統中的重要性，特別是當用戶繼續利用其借貸功能時。

KyberNetwork, another prominent player in the DeFi sector, secured the third spot with $297.3K in average fees. This highlights the continued relevance of liquidity aggregation and on-chain transactions within the decentralized landscape.

KyberNetwork 是 DeFi 領域的另一家知名企業，以 29.73 萬美元的平均費用位居第三。這凸顯了去中心化環境中流動性聚合和鏈上交易的持續相關性。

MakerDAO and Sushi Show Resilience

MakerDAO 和 Sushi 展現出韌性

MakerDAO, a key protocol in the stablecoin and lending space, recorded $262.0K in fees, placing it in fourth position. Despite the fluctuating market conditions, MakerDAO’s fee generation demonstrates the protocol’s resilience and its integral role in DeFi.

MakerDAO 是穩定幣和借貸領域的關鍵協議，其費用為 26.2 萬美元，排名第四。儘管市場狀況波動，MakerDAO 的費用產生證明了該協議的彈性及其在 DeFi 中不可或缺的作用。

Sushi, another decentralized exchange, follows with $51.5K in average fees. Although it trails behind Uniswap, Sushi’s continued presence in the top 10 projects by fees indicates its sustained user engagement and utility.

另一家去中心化交易所 Sushi 的平均費用為 5.15 萬美元。儘管落後於 Uniswap，但 Sushi 繼續躋身費用排名前 10 的項目，表明其持續的用戶參與度和效用。

Further details from the stats show that Curve, known for its efficient stablecoin swaps, generated $47.0K in fees, ranking it sixth. The protocol’s focus on providing low-slippage trades for stablecoins has kept it relevant in the competitive DeFi market.

統計數據的更多細節顯示，以高效的穩定幣互換而聞名的 Curve 產生了 47,000 美元的費用，排名第六。該協議專注於為穩定幣提供低滑點交易，使其在競爭激烈的 DeFi 市場中保持重要地位。

GMX, a decentralized perpetual exchange, garnered $38.5K in fees, reflecting the growing interest in decentralized derivatives trading. Its inclusion in the top 10 is a testament to the rising demand for perpetual contracts and leveraged trading.

GMX 是一家去中心化永續交易所，收取了 3.85 萬美元的費用，反映出人們對去中心化衍生性商品交易的興趣日益濃厚。其躋身前十名證明了永續合約和槓桿交易的需求不斷增長。

Synthetix, Spookyswap, and TraderJoe complete the list, with average fees of $19.2K, $18.8K, and $14.0K, respectively. These figures highlight the diverse range of DeFi protocols that continue to attract users and generate revenue despite varying market conditions.

Synthetix、Spookyswap 和 TraderJoe 緊隨其後，平均費用分別為 19,200 美元、18,800 美元和 14,000 美元。這些數字突顯了 DeFi 協議的多樣性，儘管市場條件各異，但它們仍繼續吸引用戶並產生收入。