|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ripple 與美國證券交易委員會(SEC)之間正在進行的法律戰再次升溫。
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is reportedly preparing to appeal a summary judgment made by Judge Analisa Torres in the ongoing lawsuit against Ripple Labs, legal sources have told Law360.
根據法律消息人士告訴 Law360,美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 正準備對法官 Analisa Torres 在針對 Ripple Labs 的持續訴訟中做出的簡易判決提出上訴。
The SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020, alleging that the company had raised over $1.3 billion through an unregistered offering of XRP tokens. Judge Torres granted summary judgment to Ripple in December 2022, ruling that the SEC had failed to show that XRP is a security.
美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 於 2020 年 12 月對 Ripple 提起訴訟,指控該公司透過未經註冊的 XRP 代幣發行籌集了超過 13 億美元資金。托雷斯法官於 2022 年 12 月對 Ripple 作出簡易判決,裁定 SEC 未能證明 XRP 是一種證券。
The SEC's decision to appeal the summary judgment is not surprising, given the high stakes involved in the case. If the SEC is successful in overturning the summary judgment, it could have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency industry.
鑑於該案涉及的高風險,美國證券交易委員會決定對簡易判決提出上訴並不令人意外。如果 SEC 成功推翻簡易判決,可能會對加密貨幣產業產生重大影響。
However, legal experts are divided on the SEC's chances of success. Some argue that the Second Circuit is likely to uphold Judge Torres' ruling, while others believe that the SEC has a strong case.
然而,法律專家對於 SEC 的成功機會存在分歧。有些人認為第二巡迴法院可能會維持托雷斯法官的裁決,而有些人則認為美國證券交易委員會有充分的理由。
John Deaton, an attorney who represents 75,000 XRP holders in the case, told Law360 that he believes the SEC is dissatisfied with the court's decision regarding XRP sales.
在此案中代表 75,000 名 XRP 持有者的律師約翰·迪頓 (John Deaton) 告訴 Law360,他認為 SEC 對法院有關 XRP 銷售的決定不滿意。
"The court found that the SEC failed to show that buyers had any contact with Ripple's promotional materials or saw XRP as an investment opportunity tied to Ripple," Deaton said. "Since buyers didn't know who they were buying from, it made the SEC's burden of proof even bigger, especially since key expert testimony was excluded."
Deaton 表示:“法院發現 SEC 未能證明買家與 Ripple 的宣傳材料有任何接觸,或將 XRP 視為與 Ripple 相關的投資機會。” “由於買家不知道他們從誰那裡購買,這使得美國證券交易委員會的舉證責任更大,特別是因為關鍵的專家證詞被排除在外。”
Deaton added that many people have asked him if XRP insiders know whether the SEC will appeal the lawsuit.
Deaton 補充說,許多人問他 XRP 內部人士是否知道 SEC 是否會對訴訟提起上訴。
"I get asked this question a lot, but the answer is no," Deaton said. "When asked if the SEC needs to vote on the decision to appeal, Marc [Fagel], a former SEC lawyer, explained, 'I believe they do. Which helps explain why it's taking so long; that's never a quick process.'"
「我經常被問到這個問題,但答案是否定的,」迪頓說。 「當被問及美國證券交易委員會是否需要對上訴決定進行投票時,美國證券交易委員會前律師馬克(法格爾)解釋說,『我相信他們需要。這有助於解釋為什麼需要這麼長時間;這從來都不是一個快速的過程。
One user asked Marc how the SEC could argue that Judge Torres' ruling was wrong when the SEC failed to prove that buyers had any contact with Ripple's promotional materials or saw XRP as an investment opportunity tied to Ripple. The user pointed out that since buyers didn't know who they were buying from, it made the SEC's burden of proof even bigger, especially since key expert testimony was excluded.
一位用戶詢問 Marc,當 SEC 未能證明買家與 Ripple 的宣傳資料有任何接觸或將 XRP 視為與 Ripple 相關的投資機會時,SEC 如何辯稱托雷斯法官的裁決是錯誤的。該用戶指出,由於買家不知道他們從誰那裡購買,這使得美國證券交易委員會的舉證責任更大,特別是因為關鍵的專家證詞被排除在外。
Marc agreed, saying that the court's logic suggests a reasonable investor wouldn't care about Ripple's involvement, which undermines the case.
馬克對此表示同意,並表示法院的邏輯表明,理性的投資者不會關心 Ripple 的參與,這會破壞此案。
"Under the court's logic, a reasonable investor should not care at all, because a reasonable investor doesn't know that XRP's value has anything to do with Ripple," Marc wrote. "(Or, less kindly, the court seems to think crypto investors are dumb.)"
Marc 寫道:“根據法院的邏輯,一個理性的投資者根本不應該關心,因為一個理性的投資者不知道 XRP 的價值與 Ripple 有任何關係。” “(或者,更不客氣的是,法院似乎認為加密貨幣投資者很愚蠢。)”
He added that the decision goes against the intent of the 1933 Securities Act, as it implies companies could avoid registration by selling through third parties.
他補充說,這項決定違背了 1933 年《證券法》的意圖,因為這意味著公司可以透過第三方銷售來避免註冊。
"Finally, the court's decision seems to protect institutional investors while leaving retail investors without safeguards—a contradiction I expect the Second Circuit to consider," Marc said.
「最後,法院的判決似乎保護了機構投資者,同時讓散戶投資者失去了保障——我希望第二巡迴法院能夠考慮這一矛盾,」馬克說。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- 五頭牛因飲用米戈里一家採礦公司的有毒廢水而死亡
- 2024-09-29 20:20:22
- 礦業和藍色經濟內閣秘書哈桑·喬霍已批准對尼亞蒂克牲畜死亡事件進行徹底調查
-
- 美元統治的終結?
- 2024-09-29 20:20:22
- 美元曾經是經濟實力的象徵,如今卻顯示出令人擔憂的下跌跡象。面對金磚國家的崛起
-
- Sable Finance:穩定幣使用和 DeFi 的新願景
- 2024-09-29 20:20:12
- Sable Finance 最近向加密貨幣市場推出了首款產品,發行穩定幣並開發去中心化金融平台。
-
- 從全球市值的增加可以看出,空頭在今天的交易中佔據了主導地位
- 2024-09-29 20:20:12
- 截至發稿,總上限為 2.3T 美元,較過去 24 小時下降 0.48%